Err…where have you been Gkozak?
Have you been living in a cave because you seemed to have missed the taped telephone conversation between Victoria Nuland, (deep) State Department, and the US Ambassador to the Ukraine in which she was caught, red handed, hand picking the Ukrainian government!
Nuland seemed more embarrassed that the Russians had managed to tape her indiscretions, including famously saying “fcuk the EU”! 😀 than she was by her interfering with the internal affairs of a sovereign country as she discussed who should be in the government after getting rid of Yanukovych (just as corrupt as the present lot but was elected to office)
Here’s the actual conversation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2QxZ8t3V_bk
and the full story, with transcript of the call is on the BBC website http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-26079957
What was she and John McCain (Him again! Wasn’t he also photographed glad-handing the “moderate” terrorists in Syria (by “moderate” we mean Al Nusra, part of Al Qaeda who did 9/11) including the terrorist that was videoed eating a Syrian government soldier’s still-beating heart and still*warm liver?) doing joining the demonstration in Maidan Square? It’s like if Russian foreign minister Lavrov joined protesters outside Congress, it would be a totally unacceptable interfering in another country’s affairs just like Nuland and McCain did…..also shots were fired both at police and demonstrators by agent provocateurs …same thing happened in 2011 in Syria when shots were fired both at police and demonstrators…sounds familiar? 😉
One can skew the purported “facts” in any manner to support their views and opinions. But essentially that means that one is confusing the facts with their opinions. You are clearly doing this. As Mark Twain said, “There are lies, there are damned lies, and there are statistics.” You claim to present objective facts, but, as with statistics, you ignore the basic, objective facts and myopically look for half-truths, or confuse your opinions with facts in order to attempt to validate your claims. Again, how do you expect anybody to believe your rhetoric when this is the case?
Sign In
