dark light

contrailjj

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 721 through 735 (of 1,053 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Vietnamese Air force picture & info wanted #2589294
    contrailjj
    Participant

    lets try this…

    I’ve never posted placemarks before so hopefully this will work.

    in reply to: Vietnamese Air force picture & info wanted #2589314
    contrailjj
    Participant

    a couple more to add…

    Da Phuc is at Vinh
    Tho Xuan is at Quang Tri
    Ap Hoa Lac is south of the Mekong (downstream from Can Tho and slightly inland)

    in reply to: Vietnamese Air force picture & info wanted #2589317
    contrailjj
    Participant

    So far I found these airbases. Many of them are high res. Can anyone name them or add missing ones ??

    01 Bien Hoa
    02 Long Thanh
    03 Da Nang
    04 Phan Rang
    05 Cam Ranh Bay (Nha Trang airport)
    06 Nha Trang
    07 Phu Cat
    08 Bai Thuong
    09 Kei An (Hai Phong)
    10 Noi Bai (Hanoi International airport)
    11 Gai Lam (Hanoi)
    12 Kep
    13 Yen Bai
    14 Binh Thuy
    15 Tan Son Nhat (Ho Chi Minh International Airport)

    Have added Bac Mai (southwest Hanoi) which is home to the air force museum

    in reply to: Vietnamese Air force picture & info wanted #2589334
    contrailjj
    Participant

    some very nice shots on this link…

    http://www.richard-seaman.com/Aircraft/Misc/VietnameseAirForce/index.html

    and some extra info regarding Nha Trang – in May 2004, Nha Trang airport reverted back to complete military use related to the training academy. Civilian flights now utilize Cam Ranh.

    As of February 2004 (my last visit) there where still numerous airframes stored/dumped at the airfield – if anyone gets the opportunity… there is a small aircraft park (6 to 8 aircraft) just inside the base’s main gate at the end of Biet Thu – I’m not too sure how easy it is to access, since I’ve lost touch with my contact in Nha Trang. Check out Google Earth for sure – there’s now higher resolution imagery of the Nha Trang area and you can make out the park and the storage areas on base.

    in reply to: Question for Mohawk and Bronco #2590203
    contrailjj
    Participant

    From Globalsecurity.com…

    “Since its inception as a joint Army and Marine program, the OV-1 Mohawk had been a center of controversy. Actually the Army and Marine requirements were never compatible and compromises were made that suited neither. From the Army’s viewpoint, the original design was compromised by shipboard requirements and other specific Marine specifications which had little application for an Army observation aircraft. From the Marine viewpoint, they were looking for a fixed-wing replacement for the old Cessna light observation aircraft and they did not require sophisticated sensor systems which they planned to carry on other aircraft. As it turned out, the Marines dropped out of the development program before the first prototypes were ready for flight.”

    http://www.globalsecurity.org/intell/systems/ov-1.htmhttp://www.globalsecurity.org/intell/systems/ov-1.htm

    More of the misguided belief at the time that multiple users’ various requirements could be filled by one aircraft. Obviously, the Mohawk was not what the Marine Corp wanted (see highlight in above quote) – where the USMC wanted a new-generation FAC, not the battlefield surveillance/reconnaisance platform the Army wanted. So, comparing the OV-1 and OV-10 is like the proverbial Apples and Oranges… the only thing they have in common is their ‘OV’ designator, their roles may have crossed paths at times but the Bronco was never intended to supercede the Mohawk.

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon Question… #2592039
    contrailjj
    Participant

    At last someone realises that Canard means Duck – and that we really mean a rearward wing position, and that all this foreplane malarkey is a distraction.

    God invented the Duck, and we all know that God is an Englishman……

    …who said foreplane was overrated? …. I need a smoke

    “quack”

    in reply to: German Aircraft Carriers? #1259567
    contrailjj
    Participant

    PS why are ships, aircraft and cars always female???

    they’re just plain sexy baby…

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon Question… #2592082
    contrailjj
    Participant

    Ofcourse this is all beaten by some chinese design…

    So… ideally now, the Chinese invented the canard (duck, en Francais – it sure doesn’t look like one) soooo… what is there to stop any decendant of some ancient kite maker from suing the pants off the decendants of the Wrights and anyone else who’s made a backwards aircraft go forward… 😀 😉

    now this is fun 😀

    in reply to: American Sukhoi #2592095
    contrailjj
    Participant

    But… what guarantee is there that the photos WERE taken at Groom Lake… this is an issue that can never be answered, given that there are no points of reference in the photos? I could simply type here that I took those photos… at 15-20 miles, they could have been taken in ANYWHERE with a big enough lens… could have been outside of Moscow, Paris, London or even Caracas.

    One thing we CAN assume is that the USAF is no stranger to the FLANKER, and is well aware of its capabilities and short-comings… as the old saying goes – ‘where there’s a will, there’s a way’ and you can bet that, regardless of whether there’s ever been a FLANKER in the hands of the USAF, the USAF has had their hands and heads in one (or two…).

    And, I stand to be corrected again, but the last I understood, Red Flag runs out of Nellis AFB (Nevada) … Groom Lake (area 51 to some), Nevada is not involved – if everyday civilian spectators are not allowed near Groom, then certainly everyday, run-of-the-mill fighter jocks (from around the world) with access to cameras and the internet won’t be permitted either.

    in reply to: SU-30MKP (Persian) ???????! #2592100
    contrailjj
    Participant

    Does iran have air to air refuellers?

    yes… how airworthy?? granted, the Boeings are flying boom, but don’t eliminate the possibility that the ex-Iraq Su-24s had buddy packs for probe and drogue.

    http://www.iiaf.net/aircraft/tankers.html

    in reply to: T-28 Trojan In Combat #1260758
    contrailjj
    Participant

    How did the North get T-28’s before the war?

    I thought only the South had them and the North didn’t get any until after the war.

    Defections do work both ways…

    Here’s a couple shots I found of RVN Trojans at Nha Trang

    in reply to: American Sukhoi #2593288
    contrailjj
    Participant

    HAHAHAHA… You are dead wrong mate! This pictures actually show Royal Malaysian Airforce (RMAF) MiG-29N and RAAF F/A-18A during Ops Churinga Excercise circa 1999 at Malaysia.Period

    woopsie!… mea culpa 😮
    a little back reading and closer look, and yup – I can even see the Malaysian roundels

    in reply to: How Low Can You Go?? #1262308
    contrailjj
    Participant

    ahh, now I remember… that I don’t remember..

    I downloaded a WMV copy from a site that had 3 possible mirrors… can’t for the life of me rememebr which one. (and didn’t bookmark it either)

    The WMV file is over 630 MB… have you got an FTP site?

    JJ

    in reply to: German Aircraft Carriers? #1262518
    contrailjj
    Participant

    There are very nice (albeit smallish) profiles of both the Graf Zeppelin and Aquila in Anthony Preston’s ‘The World’s Great Aircraft Carriers’… 1999, Brown Books, ISBN 1-897884-58-3

    Generally some great photos and profiles of most fro WWI to ‘present’.

    in reply to: German Aircraft Carriers? #1263719
    contrailjj
    Participant

    I read the same text about a week ago and thought… ‘neat’… how many capital ships can claim to have been sunk twice? (perhaps a couple of the big US BBs after Pearl?)

Viewing 15 posts - 721 through 735 (of 1,053 total)