sferrin in several threads you pointed out that Russian make mistake by using H2 and you are right,but only if you think that H2 will be used in all future rockets/planes.Russians use H2 forced by few reasons.The main purpose in all their experiments is to test engine combustion in speeds above M5.But there is a problem with the heat.Here is small table that show you how important is flight altitude for heat level.
Mach number 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5 3,0 5,0 10,0
Height of flight 50 м
Speed m/s 340,3 510 681 851 1021 1701 3403
Speed km/h 1225 1837 2450 3062 3675 6125 12250
Heat level ,К 346 418 519 648 807 1729 6051
Heat gain ,К 58 130 231 360 519 1441 5763
Height of flight 11 km
Speed m/s 295,0 442 590 737 885 1475 2950
Speed km/h 1062 1593 2124 2655 3186 5310 10620
Heat level ,К 250 314 390 487 606 1300 4550
Heat gain ,К 43 97 173 270 389 1083 4333
Why i posted this?Because all russian experiments are done in high altitudes,where O2 is low but the heat also is low.That is why they use H2 and liquid O2 in their test vehicles.The most important thing right now is to understand the principles behind supersonic combustion.Heat level is known how to “fight” in their half century experience in space.In future,when there is knowledge how to make stable engine capable of atleast several minute flight,there will be new fuel.As you may know Kh-31 use solid fuel,and also Russians have wide experience in using two-component fuels.Yes that means that the future rockets may suffer from using two component fuels,but that is necessary if you want high speed (M>7) soon.NASP X-30 also use H2 and O2,forced by the lack of oxygen in high altitudes.Here is some experiment vehicles that they build over the years(in short):
“Holod”(Cold)
Used to test H2 use in rockets/planes.Development begin in 6 Mart 1979.First flight 28 November 1991 in Khazakstan.Achievements.
[PHP]Date: Speed, m/s Heigh, km Mach number Engine running time, s
27.11.91 1653 35 5,6 ———-
17.11.92 1535 22,4 5,35 27,5
1.03.95 1712 30 5,8 41,5
1.08.97 1832 33 6,2 ———–
12.10.98 1863 33 6,2 77[/PHP]
The last flight was limited by the maximum flight time of the rocket,engine proved to be capable of more than that.
Three of the experiments was with partners from NERA, Aerospatiale, SNECMA-SEP(France) and NASA.This live tests compared with the 15s HyFly engine run is quite impressive.
Kh-90
This missile is equiped with hydrocarbon based fuel(kerosine).Speed M4-5,with range around 3000km in altitudes between 7000-20 000 meters.The missile is developed by “Raduga” design bureau,creators of AS-4,AS-6,AS-16,AS-9,SS-N-22,AS-15,AS-11 missiles.
Later some information about other projects.
“The Super Hornet is cleared for up 55 degrees alpha I believe. The Raptor can cruise at Mach 1.7 but the engines are also fine down to 0 knots or 60 degrees alpha. No Russian engine has that type of flexibility or performance envelope right now.”
No one can deny that Russia lack engine capable of giving an Su-30(for example) supercruise,but your other statement is just crap.There is lost of videos of Su-27/30/35 stunt maneuvers,so i can say “but the engines are also fine down to -80 knots or 120 degrees alpha”.For the -80 knots part,there is a move done by Su-30/35 in which the plane flyes with engine nozzles forward and they still run.
Yeah,he can lift 100 tons like An-124,or trasport 400 passengers like B-747…For me best aircraft in the world is An-2,but its hard to compare it with F-22.
BACK TO TOPIC(and prease no more ww2 spam)
On 28 June there was a visit in Varna(Bulgaria) of Il-76 and Su-30MK on their way to Venezuela.Here is some photos.



Later there will be some of Il-76 on it’s way back.There is rumor that this will be around 14-20th July.
Here is R-33:
And here R-37:

Yesterday in the russian news,they said that the pilot is still not found,and that few kilometers from the crash,there was parachute.I hope there will be good news.
In the past there was a speculation that Yak-38 were withdrawn from service because they had high rate of accidents.Against this claims was a article in one Ukrainian magazine that make comparison between Yak-38 and Harrier losses.As Ken said there was 36 Yak-38 lost,that makes 15,6%.Harrier was build in 535 numbers(by the time of the article) and there was 100 losses,of wich 9 are in combat situations.That makes 18,7%.But Harrier was much more used so the numbers are equal.
Few more:

sferrin i think the guy just misunderstood the picture.The plane looks like tailless B-1 and Tu-160,or Swallow watched from angle.Only if you know allready or make little research you can find that the design is completely and radically different.
You can smell them too,right? :rolleyes:
Found this few minutes ago:
“It had to happen some day. I guess the pilot of this Super Bug is pretty proud of himself. Here are two HUD captures from a VFA-11 F/A-18F acting as Red Air against an F-22A
Looks like the Raptor found himself in front of a slow Super Hornet, which is not where anybody wants to be. The F-18F is at 15K feet, 20 degrees AOA, Mach 0.36, pulling 1.7G, with a peak previous G of 7.6 for the fight. HUD shows he has squeezed the trigger. It’s not exactly what you’d call “comfortably saddled up in his six” or anything like that — it’s clearly a high deflection shot — but it does show the Super Hornet can point its nose when it wants to.”
“Besides, on thing amazes me. There are interminable threads about future PAK-FA, Su 35 UBPRTZXEW, or whatever. How terrifiant they will be how they will wipe out the already obsolete F 22 with their dozens of Ks 172 or R 77 (put any letter you wish), engaging them at 500 km or more, after they detect it with their uberIRST or Irbis from 1000 km, accelerating and supercruising at 10 Mach…But I personally didn’t remark someane questioning the necesity of any future Russian fighter. Equally the PLAAF of Indian AF threads debates the MKK, J10 or MKI yet no one is asking why India needs 150 MKIs or China 300+ MKKs…OTOH, the Raptor is too expensive, there are too many of them, US need just two dozens or so.”
Could you back up your claims?I don’t remember someone to tell that Su 35/UB/BM(just learn it,it’s not hard) “will wipe out” F-22.It’s you that make that claim.And “interminable” threads?For 5 pages with threads there is ONE about Russia’s 5-th gen fighter,ONE about Su-27 crash and ONE about Su-30 for Venezuela…i mean about WW2.In comparison there is 6(SIX) about JSF!So stop crying and understand that if someone tell that R-77 is good missile,he mean just that,not that R-77 is the ultra,uber F-22 killer.About India,you maybe forget that India is neighbour with Pakistan and China,and they are not best friends.Same for China with their “nice” friends Taiwan and India… 😉
Sens you don’t believe the information from russian websites,but here is some from ACIG.You may find it have more credibility.
“During April and May 1980 four Yak-38s and four AV-MF pilots were deployed to Afghanistan as part of a 50-day trial codenamed Romb-1, although the ‘hot and high’ conditions prevented any meaningful combat missions from being undertaken – in total, 12 combat sorties were made, but only two 100-kg bombs could be carried. In the event, any involvement would have been further limited by the ‘near-operational’ nature of the Romb-1 deployment (which also involved the first and third prototype Su-25s). The aircraft involved were not intended to be subject to combat, but rather tested under conditions that simulated the battlefield to a high degree. Despite their official non-operational nature, aircraft involved in the Romb trials could be requested to undertake combat sorties by local divisional commanders, on an ad hoc basis. The Yak-38s and prototype Su-25s operated out of a specially prepared air base near Shindand. Even with a much-reduced fuel and weapons load, the Yak-38 proved incapable of operating during the hot daylight hours (after around 0500 hrs); on the basis of this poor showing, the VVS quickly lost any remaining interest it had in the type.”
This is the hole article
And if you were searching just a little you can find also video from that operation:http://video.aviacia.ru/index.php?s=141
It’s about russian VTOL fighters and there is some(even short) about “Romb”
And if you still don’t believe i can post the names of the pilots,plane numbers,airfield names,dates of testing and first flights.
Here is camouflage scheme of that operation.

About new A-50 i read in another article,that it will be capable of giving target data,and also guide long range missiles fired from fighters,thus they will not need to turn on their radars.Also the hole system will be with modular,with new radar and capable of changing old modules with new better ones,without the need for complicated work on the hole system.And last,modernised A-50 will be able to control more fighters.
OK,my bad.Sorry if you feel i insulted you.English is not my native language so sometimes i can’t express myself easy.
aurcov what are you,12 years old?kilcoo316 understand what i mean,but your biased mind only see “F-22 is on the base of Su-27”.
What i mean is like MiG threat in Vietnam showed that the lack of guns and ignoring WVR combat was mistake and next USA fighters were influenced by this.