dark light

Whitley_Project

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,191 through 2,205 (of 2,284 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Ugliest Aircraft #1566565
    Whitley_Project
    Participant

    I’m overjoyed no one has put a Whitley on their list so far.

    1) Short Sturgeon – the biggest minger of them all
    2) A W Ape
    3) Ki-32 ‘mary’ yuk

    in reply to: F-18s over london #2676749
    Whitley_Project
    Participant

    Thanks – I don’t think there was any jubilee event going on at the time and they were going bloody fast. I assumed there was some sort of alert with a passenger aircraft and they were on an intercept course….

    I brought it up on another forum at the time… i’ll see if I can find it in the archive.

    Would love to know more….

    in reply to: Prop ID #1567502
    Whitley_Project
    Participant

    Hmm… thought it was VDM at first glance, but probably actually a Hamillton Standard.

    in reply to: Buried Lancasters.(2004 thread) #1586157
    Whitley_Project
    Participant

    Re: buried Lancs

    Originally posted by lancasterman
    Not sure if it was at Elsham, but a group did dig down after searching for the lancs with ground penetrating radar. The images whoed 3 lancaster fusleages complete including the plexiglass with wings strapped nearby. When they started digging down, they went right through the “lancasters” due to the type of soil conditions the aircrat had dissolved so that it was only the metallic soil that showed up the famous outlines of the three aircraft.

    Peter

    Are you sure about that? Sounds a bit strange to me – bearing in mind aircraft remains are always being dug up – there is always something left.

    in reply to: Help save the Beverley #1586351
    Whitley_Project
    Participant

    Do you know why fuji?

    in reply to: Strange Spit starter pushbutton #1593445
    Whitley_Project
    Participant

    I had some of these a while ago and they didn’t all have numbers on the back!

    in reply to: Late Marque Spitfire Exhausts… #1596518
    Whitley_Project
    Participant

    Re: Just off the top of my head

    Originally posted by Mark12
    😉

    Inconel Alloy Technical Data

    CHARACTERISTICS
    Service 2,000°F (1,094°C)
    Melting Point 2,500°F (1,372°C)

    PROPERTIES
    Nickel-Chromium-Iron alloy
    Resists corrosion and heat
    High strength and good workability
    Virtually immune to chloride-ion stress-corrosion cracking
    Not hardened by precipitation
    Resistant to sulfur compounds
    Resistant to oxidizing conditions at high temperatures

    CHEMICAL COMPOSITION
    Nickel (plus Cobalt) 72.0% min
    Chromium 14 – 17%
    Iron 6 – 10%
    Carbon 0.15% max
    Manganese 1.0% max
    Sulfur 0.015% max
    Silicone 0.50% max
    Copper 0.50% max

    PHYSICAL CONSTANTS
    Density 0.304 lb/cu in (8.43 gm/cu cm)
    Specific Heat 0.106 (at 70deg;F, Btu/lb/ °F)
    Poisson’s Ratio 0.29 (at 70°F)
    Electrical Resistivity 620 (at 70°F, ohm/circ mil/ft)
    Curie Temperature 192°F
    Permeability 1.010 (at 70°F and 200 oersted)
    Thermal Conductivity 103 (Btu in/ft2 h °F))

    APPLICATIONS
    Heat treating industry for retorts, muffles, roller hearths, and other furnace components for heat-treating baskets and trays
    Aeronauts industry
    Electronics industry
    Nuclear reactors

    Mark

    Very impressive as usual Mark, but are these compositions for the type of Inconel used in aircraft exhaust stubs – or just general specs? There are at least 20 different Inconel alloy available 🙁

    Thanks anyway tho 🙂

    Elliott

    in reply to: Late Marque Spitfire Exhausts… #1598970
    Whitley_Project
    Participant

    Originally posted by Bruce
    Many of the WW2 stacks, particularly the complex double entry ones were made of Inconel – I dont know the make up of this alloy, but suffice to say it is less prone to cracking than stainless, and doesnt rust like mild steel.

    Just to confuse the issue…..

    Bruce

    Does anyone out there know which Inconel alloy was used in these stubs?

    Thanks a million

    Elliott

    in reply to: Stolen Logbook and other items #1600857
    Whitley_Project
    Participant

    Were these the only items taken or was it a more opportunistic theft?

    in reply to: Hurricane in East Sutton, Kent #1601546
    Whitley_Project
    Participant

    Hi Adrian

    Need the serial number really to check which Hurri it is. Maybe someone out there will know…

    in reply to: P-38's to be recovered in May 2005 #1601665
    Whitley_Project
    Participant

    I suppose it’s easy to be highly optimistic about what you will achieve etc when starting out on a venture like this – the original group were planning on bringing up two P-38s, but in the event, were lucky to get one.

    I don’t think anyone would seriously take this project on as a money making venture – definately a labour of love.

    Who knows, maybe they have developed a clever new way of getting down there and bringing the whole aircraft to the surface – maybe they have industry support, sponsorship etc. They can certainly do it (and I think it is worth it – where else will you get such an original early P-38 – god my mouth is watering and i have little interest in anything American) and I really hope they pull it off. Part of me would love to be down in the belly of that glacier with them.

    in reply to: P-38's to be recovered in May 2005 #1601908
    Whitley_Project
    Participant

    Supposedly quite a lot – they were even able to use 40% of the original skin! Definately worth it, but extremely hard work and very very expensive.

    in reply to: P-38's to be recovered in May 2005 #1601994
    Whitley_Project
    Participant

    I hope they do go after the forts – they are nice early ones, but it’s very unlikely. They will be lucky to pull up one P-38 – it’s an enormous effort. Having spent last weekend dismantling Whitley bits in the open in semi-artic Norfolk they have my deepest sympathy 😀

    in reply to: North Weald update #1603121
    Whitley_Project
    Participant

    I got one of those today – looking forward to the next email

    Seems this campaign has a lot of support behind it. Hopefully it will get a shout out in FP or aeroplane

    in reply to: Anymore scrap yard pics??? #1603375
    Whitley_Project
    Participant

    Mark,

    Oh I just put two and two together eventually 😀

    Having recently turned 30 I am not quite the sharp young man I used to be 😉

    I will do my very best to get along to Shoreham!

    Originally posted by Mark12
    Eliott,

    I would anticipate seeing the new Japanese immigrants on the day of the next Shoreham Aerojumble in March.

    Was it the sideburns and Zapata moustache or the front spar attachments? That is not LA564 by the way.

    Mark

Viewing 15 posts - 2,191 through 2,205 (of 2,284 total)