Looks great Cees – more more!
Hi David
Another way to describe it could be a blooming miracle! Here are some more pictures. I picked up the remains of this control wheel a few years ago from Whitley AD712.
Other items are the direct vision panels from the canopy – they’ve cleaned up nicely. The prespex was replaced as the old material was scratched and cracked.
The refurbished emergency hydraulic hand pump – licence built by Automotive Products.
A couple of views of the blind flying panel. I was lucky to find a really nice original 6a/616 square panel. The pipework is a mixture of new and original – some of it was extremely difficult to make but it came out quite well in the end – a job i’m glad I won’t have to do again. I’m on the lookout for some bonding strips now for the pipes.





No need to pick on the guy. What he does in his own time is his own business. No need to lower the tone – we do our best to keep it friendly here.
If only Jeepman! If only! There is nothing more I would like than to see a Whitley at Legends one day.
It is indeed the very heart of the Whitley and as you say everything does hang off it.
Roger – this is a port rear quarter view, so from behind and to port. The front part is facing the wall.
Dave Hardy – yes the frame is a bit of a monster. It’s fairly hard work to move actually.
David Collins – yes – this is only a trial fit so the brackets have yet to be welded. Examination of the centre section and comparison with other centre section remains reveals no significant deformation which is good news.
Cees – Its fairly compact for such a large aircraft. It’s almost 2m long however and is a similar height. The front and rear fuselages do bolt directly onto this structure. I’m currently organising the fabrication of a new batch of square tube with the appropriate radiused corners – sadly not available off the shelf these days, and exceedingly expensive.
somebody has to say it……………
will it be at Legends this year?
presumably that is the very heart of any Whitley rebuild and everything else hangs off it
keep up the good work
Centre section progress
Dear all – part of the centre section from N1498 is now trial mounted to the jig – thanks to Merlin Pete who finished off the mounting brackets last week – he’s very busy but still managed to get this done super quickly. Once these are welded to the jig the vital measurements can be taken and the dismantling of the section will begin. I have centre sections from several Whitleys – this one has some fire damage. The fuselage fuel tank sits atop the centre section.

I cant say about other bomber types, but if you are ever at Kew you could take a look at this!
http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/catalogue/displaycataloguedetails.asp?CATLN=6&CATID=4932696&j=1
Cheers
Thanks for that Elliot, I wondered if there was some sort of odd requirement to operate from short fields.
I’m genuinely fascinated by this, I had no idea that RATO was even considered for RAF bombers of the period (thinking it was purely a German thing), were any others capable of being so equiped?
Just as you say Pagen01 – for short and heavy take offs. Whitleys were used in a transport role with BOAC and for glider towing. RATO was not used on a regular basis as far I have found out.
Seriously?! If so what was the main idea (other than a short and heavy take-of!)
That’s a RATO Whitley – not used much I should add.
Well done for taking a look Allan and Stuart – yes the remains of the DF loop look Whitley to me. I have the mounting from another site but have been looking for the ‘egg’ for some time! Is there any chance you could pick it up for me next time you are walking the dog? :p
I think the fuel/oil tank sump with the 102 prefix is Oxford – it’s not from a Whitley.
The undercarriage assembly looks Anson to me.
Well worth having a look I think!
Have a read of this AndyG – its quite interesting:
Yes, but could you understand it? 😀
I wish! Sadly would need a bit of help!
Hi Don
The parts with the AIR prefix were manufactured by Automotive Products. They are likely to be licence built Lockheed hydraulic components and the numbers you supply certainly seem wartime.
I could probably use some of the gland cups you mention for the Whitley if you have any spare!
All the best
Elliott
That’s a Japanese Army altimeter – looks in good condition too. If only it could speak….
Absolutely – it’s not uncommon for offical records to be wrong from time to time. Be cautious!
Cheers Ian