dark light

duxfordhawk

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,906 through 1,920 (of 2,593 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Favourite biplane #1414277
    duxfordhawk
    Participant

    I have quiet a love for Hawker Hind and Nimrod also the Gladiator and i confess still love Pitts Specials too.

    in reply to: Rare Concorde Photo's #1419355
    duxfordhawk
    Participant

    I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again……..

    BA should have given them to the RAF last year…… 😀

    After all they passed on the VC-10’s and Tristar’s so why not the ‘pocket rocket’…….. 😉

    And old Trust-Me Tone could have played one upmanship with Dubbya Bush, afterall, he’s only got a couple of 747’s………. 😀 :rolleyes:

    I am sure Blair had a thought or two on that but parking one would be suceh a problem with so many nations not letting you fly in there Airspace mind you it been perfect for going to tea at the Whitehouse 😀 .

    in reply to: Low Price Camera Voting Thread – PULLED #1419364
    duxfordhawk
    Participant

    No apology needed mate i must admit i could not fathom out your voting systems numbers and could not see any numbers that were posts i had sent which confused me,I was fearing a American style election problem 😀 .

    Seriously i hope this is not going to ruin a great thread and the great idea that your company would donate a prize and i hope most people posted photo’s to share them more than to win a prize as its been a lot of fun seeing how us with the cheaper end of digital cameras have done compared to the big boy DSLR cameras and many of the results have been great in my view.

    in reply to: Funniest Airshow Memory? #1421439
    duxfordhawk
    Participant

    No urban myth (although allegedly not entirely thier fault) and neither is the F-111 at Cambridge, the F-16s at Kenley or several others!

    Melv

    The F-16s buzzing Kenley instead of Biggin is the funniest moment i can remember.

    in reply to: Two Minutes – It's not enough #1432517
    duxfordhawk
    Participant

    I find that I need to remove myself from the office, to go and have a private moment of quiet somewhere else.

    Comments floating around over the last few minutes (“Oh, we forgot about 11:00…”) have confirmed my suspicion that the vast majority of people here carried on working and talking, completely oblivious of the moment…….. 🙁 :confused:

    I am just thinking how lucky they are to be able to have the chance to be oblivious to the two minutes silence after all if it was not for the men and women who gave everything that moment would not exist now,We must never forget EVER.

    in reply to: General Discussion #414441
    duxfordhawk
    Participant

    Its not a fear and sorry for going slightly of topic but I cannot stand the touch of cotton wool it like running your fingers down a blackboard to me nasty stuff

    My mate has the same cottonwool problem we can’t even touch candy floss or cotton buds.

    in reply to: General Discussion #416391
    duxfordhawk
    Participant

    Its now emerging that the rail crash on Saturday may have been caused by a suicide,In effect that person if they did commit suicide is also responsible for 6 other deaths that sums up to murder really,This may seem heartless of me to say but i never understand why some people throw themselves in front of trains i always seen it as selfish,You ruin the lives of people who never even know you including the driver of the train(having talked to many i can say they don’t get over it easily and get flashbacks),Also theres the ordinary folk who either witness the horror or get held up by it in delays etc,I understand the depression that leads to wanting to kill yourself but there are other ways if your serious about it that won’t effect strangers.
    I am sorry if i have spoke out of turn here but i have worked on the railway for over 6 years and seen the after effects of such incidents so feel a little touchy about it.
    My sympathies go to all the families effect by the crash on saturday.

    in reply to: General Discussion #416396
    duxfordhawk
    Participant

    I am glad to see her back on form i think the pressure of the olympics got to her so much that she was not able to function,It can not have been easy to comeback from that but she has and that shows the class of athlete she is,Well done i say.

    in reply to: General Discussion #416842
    duxfordhawk
    Participant

    How very, very sad.
    In our ever increasingly bland world filled with seemingly endless political correctness people like Fred are more needed than ever.

    He will be sadly missed.
    Andy

    I agree i see it as we are now getting personalities who are all looks and well no personality,Fred and John Peel were much more than that they loved what they were talking about to the point you could also feel there passion and enjoy it also through them,RIP Fred.

    in reply to: General Discussion #416971
    duxfordhawk
    Participant

    Such a shame just like John Peel he had a passion and love for what he was doing was infectious,I loved his passion for steam the most he showed how pioneering the steam days were and how much we owe to those days.

    in reply to: General Discussion #417125
    duxfordhawk
    Participant

    Firstly i would like to say i am so sorry for your loss and i do know what your going through with this.
    There is not much i can say now to justify why anyone does such a thing but the very modern world and rich country thing can be more a cause than a lot of things in my view.
    Let me explain we live in a world that is moving at such a pace and a lot of people have no time for others in reality most of us probably know more about people we know through the net than we know our nieghbours,Many of us live in high pressure situations from work and relationships we have debts and are trying to control,I also think the wall to wall 24 hour TV new also can have a bad effect because things that happen elsewhere in the world are now in your home in moments you can not escape it.
    I feel modern life is much more high pressured than any era before it and maybe this is why so many people chose to take there lives.

    in reply to: Fuji S5000 Aviation Photo Club #1437540
    duxfordhawk
    Participant

    Here is a few more photo’s From Biggin Hill i probably call this my last because i look like i am posting too many.

    in reply to: Show us your models!! #1438433
    duxfordhawk
    Participant

    Some great models here people would post some of mine but they resigned to the loft at my mates doubt they will see day light again.

    in reply to: Fuji S5000 Aviation Photo Club #1438611
    duxfordhawk
    Participant

    Here is a few more of mine and i tend to think the lynx is not a vintage Aircraft and i only posted my chinook photo because i am quiet proud of it maybe im being bit self-indulgent there.
    My next set of picture include Yak50 and 52s which i am not sure if class as vintage either,But i tend to think they are the nearest thing many people can get to owning a warbird,So does that count?

    in reply to: Fiat G46 #1438698
    duxfordhawk
    Participant

    No way.
    In short, the G.46 was a postwar trainer. By then, Italy was a republic, so the royal cross and badge on the rudder are anachronistic.
    No desert camouflage was ever applied to the Italian G.46 fleet either.
    The result is about as realistic as the paintwork on the Australian G.59, or the wacky Frasca conversion in the States. If anyone did the equivalent to a Spit or ‘109, this board would be saturated with protests. But it’s Italian, so nobody even notices. Why, oh why?

    Veltro

    I think the why oh why can be answered by the fact that we have got no “Real” Italian warbirds flying so the G46 and G59 are nearest we get and a little like the Buchon situation they end up in colours not becoming to the roles they flew when in service.
    Myself i feel lucky to have seen both a G46 and G59 fly and wish more Italian designs were flying now they are a largely neglected nation when it comes to Warbirds.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,906 through 1,920 (of 2,593 total)