dark light

Wyvernfan

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,841 through 3,855 (of 5,170 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Chance Vought F4U-5NL Corsair F-AZYS #1147351
    Wyvernfan
    Participant

    http://www.dorst-freiburg.de/BilderStregaHP/Corsair%20F-AZYS/F4U5%20Corsair%202010-12-23(2).jpg

    Nice update Matthias. Those letters on the fin look familiar;).

    in reply to: Seen On Ebay Thread #1149815
    Wyvernfan
    Participant

    I agree. In my previous profession my experience was that if someone came along, picked something up and thought it overpriced they would put it back down again, and walk away without looking at anything else.

    in reply to: Flying A Services? #1150000
    Wyvernfan
    Participant

    “and please do share this with anyone else you know (both here and in the US) who has an interest in the protection of historic and unique sites such as this”.

    Shame they didn’t think of that whilst it was still recognisable for what it was!

    in reply to: Seen On Ebay Thread #1150105
    Wyvernfan
    Participant
    in reply to: Scrapyard Photos; Any More? #1152006
    Wyvernfan
    Participant

    Excellent pics QuePee.. thanks for sharing them.

    in reply to: Sea Vixen Photograph Help #1152181
    Wyvernfan
    Participant

    So if the Nav is leaning forward to look into the scope, does that mean he has had to slacken off his seat / chute harness in order to do so?

    in reply to: Wings In A Shed In Wigan #1152744
    Wyvernfan
    Participant

    Some years back, a guy was selling Malcolm hoods & other interesting odds & sodits, I think he advertized in Flypast or Control Column, don’t know if they were the same ones though.

    Bob. T

    Yes i remember those, and at £35 or £45 each i believe!

    in reply to: Sea Vixen Photograph Help #1154811
    Wyvernfan
    Participant

    Yes cracking photos. Times like these it does make me feel rather sorry for the Nav in the ‘coal hole’. With only a tiny window and the pilots voice to tell him whats going on, it must have been a pretty big shock for him to stick his head up having first jettisoned the hatch and see the aircraft surrounded by flames and burning fuel.

    in reply to: General Discussion #305119
    Wyvernfan
    Participant

    Flygirl – We all know about that Auntie P4 Rover you keep hidden away in your lock up ;).

    James – I’m with you. I find old cars far more interesting and entertaining to drive. BUT, for me there is nothing worse or more soul destroying than being let down by something purely because of its age. You know the sort of thing.. stuck in traffic, pouring with rain, and the wiper motor or alternator packs up. Of course the same could happen with a modern car but like modern aircraft reliability is / should be more or less bomb proof.

    I remember once driving home in a 1965 Humber Imperial that i had just bought. Stopping at a set of traffic lights, in the dark, the sodding thing cut-out completely without warning. No ignition, no lights, nothing. I had to push it across the lights, in town (all one and a half tons of it) and get a mate to come out and tow me home. The cause? A corroded solenoid box on the bulkhead that i subsequently couldn’t find a replacement for. Not even the relevant car club could come up with one. Needless to say it was sold on soon after.

    If such things as electronic ignition etc are retro fitted then that would probably go some way to making everyday life with a classic much more bearable and enjoyable, especially during the summer months. But then again, during the winter with all that salt on the roads… be prepared to watch your classic dissolve into a pile of rust.

    Thats my thoughts anyway :).

    in reply to: Classic car as a daily runner? #1894538
    Wyvernfan
    Participant

    Flygirl – We all know about that Auntie P4 Rover you keep hidden away in your lock up ;).

    James – I’m with you. I find old cars far more interesting and entertaining to drive. BUT, for me there is nothing worse or more soul destroying than being let down by something purely because of its age. You know the sort of thing.. stuck in traffic, pouring with rain, and the wiper motor or alternator packs up. Of course the same could happen with a modern car but like modern aircraft reliability is / should be more or less bomb proof.

    I remember once driving home in a 1965 Humber Imperial that i had just bought. Stopping at a set of traffic lights, in the dark, the sodding thing cut-out completely without warning. No ignition, no lights, nothing. I had to push it across the lights, in town (all one and a half tons of it) and get a mate to come out and tow me home. The cause? A corroded solenoid box on the bulkhead that i subsequently couldn’t find a replacement for. Not even the relevant car club could come up with one. Needless to say it was sold on soon after.

    If such things as electronic ignition etc are retro fitted then that would probably go some way to making everyday life with a classic much more bearable and enjoyable, especially during the summer months. But then again, during the winter with all that salt on the roads… be prepared to watch your classic dissolve into a pile of rust.

    Thats my thoughts anyway :).

    in reply to: Struck off charge; Before, during or after scrapping? #1088508
    Wyvernfan
    Participant

    Thanks. Have replied Andy!

    in reply to: Struck off charge; Before, during or after scrapping? #1088768
    Wyvernfan
    Participant

    No apology needed, as its an interesting subject that i may need to refer to at some point in the future.

    Having said that i wonder just how many individuals have invested their own money into excavating a crash site, only to lose their haul of parts to a recipient of the MOD’s choice?

    in reply to: Struck off charge; Before, during or after scrapping? #1088986
    Wyvernfan
    Participant

    James – Yes, but more to do with future reference and dates on photos.

    Tangmere – Slight thread drift i know and you would certainly know more on this subject than me, but if say a wreck is still in situ in the ground and the MOD / Crown have made no attempt to recover it, within say five years of the incident, then surely ownership passes onto the landowner.. even when struck off charge. Likewise if parts or wreckage are excavated / retrieved with the appropriate permission and licence and no claim is made on them as part of the granting of said licence then surely they wouldn’t have a leg to stand on as regards re-claiming them post recovery!

    Or is that just a naive view?

    in reply to: Struck off charge; Before, during or after scrapping? #1089094
    Wyvernfan
    Participant

    Thanks guys.

    in reply to: Mystery Throttle box #1089721
    Wyvernfan
    Participant

    Steady on Timbo, we must welcome all converts. 😀

Viewing 15 posts - 3,841 through 3,855 (of 5,170 total)