dark light

Gonzo

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 117 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Who owns the most planes in the world? #533521
    Gonzo
    Participant

    Buried below your new tower!

    Excellent….we’ll move back to the old one while we dig it up….everyone wins!

    As for one person owning aeroplanes, I seem to remember that I read somewhere that bmi and bmiBaby aircraft are all owned by Sir Michael Bishop’s holding company (owned totally by him) and then leased to bmi and Baby.

    in reply to: Who owns the most planes in the world? #533562
    Gonzo
    Participant

    Where’s the prize? 😀

    in reply to: Who owns the most planes in the world? #533603
    Gonzo
    Participant

    This the person you were thinking of?……

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_F._Udvar-Hazy

    in reply to: Branson warns of threat to A380 maker #535791
    Gonzo
    Participant

    But LHR will be seeing almost double the A380 traffic then any US airport IMO , so its a pretty decent investment for them as most of the airlines that have ordered this airacraft will atleast use some for comming into LHR . LHR is probably the most suitable airport for the A380 .

    That may well be, but there are still going to be many restrictions on traffic when an A380 is in; only certain taxiways and stands will be used, and there will be restrictions on which a/c can pass abeam an A380 on another taxiway. In fact, with the current wake vortex considerations, and the airfield restrictions, it might well prove to be the case that it will cause more disruption and delay than the extra passenger numbers warrant.

    I’ve heard that although SIA will bring one in on the inaugural revenue earning A380 flight (rumour is that it’s in the contract with Airbus), they will immediately switch their 380s to Singapore-Australia.

    in reply to: Branson warns of threat to A380 maker #536371
    Gonzo
    Participant

    interesting article..

    US airports plan ground restrictions for A380

    http://www.theage.com.au/news/travel/us-airports-plan-ground-restrictions-for-a380/2007/04/30/1177788002519.html

    The US airports are not special in that regard, LHR is going to be the same.

    in reply to: Video tour around LHRs new control tower #540364
    Gonzo
    Participant

    It’s great working at Heathrow, certainly, and if all goes well tonight, then we’ll have an even better view than before.

    A pity it’s a retrograde step in many ways.

    in reply to: Bad day at the office! ATC at JFK :eek: #541605
    Gonzo
    Participant

    The lighting system at LHR (follow the greens) is used at night or during the day when the viz is less than 1000m.

    The system is easy to follow from a flight crew point of view, however it requires us, the ATCOs, to co-ordinate constantly with our lighting operators to set up the correct routes, so actually increases our workload.

    Listening to those JFK clips make me cringe. If that sort of thing was happening at LHR, the ATCO concerned would be in the sim pretty sharpish for remedial training!

    in reply to: BREAKING LBA NEWS #547862
    Gonzo
    Participant

    medium/ short long haul flights

    You what? 😀

    in reply to: Self proclaimed experts bash the F-22 #2552068
    Gonzo
    Participant

    And there I was thinking Antonov was Ukrainian……..

    in reply to: Could someone identify this for me please #556100
    Gonzo
    Participant
    in reply to: RPV vrs Airliner #560113
    Gonzo
    Participant

    ATFS,

    I’m the unit Representative for GATCO at Heathrow Tower, and I promise you it was on the cover. If I can find a copy of the mag, I’ll scan it and email it to you.

    BTW, the mag is called ‘Transmit’.

    Aha! Handily it’s still the current issue, therefore the cover is on the website. Here, have a look at http://www.gatco.org/transmit.html

    in reply to: RPV vrs Airliner #560330
    Gonzo
    Participant

    I don’t believe this is fake.

    It’s a Predator UAV, I believe, and an Ariana A300 in Afghanistan.

    It was used recently as the cover picture of the magazine of the Guild of Air Traffic Controllers (GATCO) to highlight ATC issues with UAVs.

    in reply to: USAF Tanker Requirement #2511349
    Gonzo
    Participant

    Phantom,

    No, I don’t have any inside information.

    I was just curious.

    in reply to: USAF Tanker Requirement #2512393
    Gonzo
    Participant

    Maybe the consensus with the Europeans taking part of with those who simply like Airbus, but for the rest of us, the KC-767 makes perfect sense. I don’t deny the KC-30 is a better tanker plane for plane, but for the USAF’s needs, the KC-767 is the better solution……

    …..This is especially true when you consider the fact that more KC-767’s will be purchased than KC-30’s (if the latter was chosen in lieu of the KC-767 that is)…….

    …..You guys can have the fact that plane for plane the KC-30 is better performing, but in this case, and for the USAF, the KC-767 is the better solution, and like it or not, it will be the airplane that is selected….

    Phantom, hypothetically, if the KC-30 was offered at the same price as (or even cheaper than) the KC-767, what then?

    in reply to: Mystery plane at Heathrow #2513427
    Gonzo
    Participant

    Why a purpose built rig? As has been said, it combines many characteristics of different a/c (doubled deck, tail engine etc). Also, it has a very complicated fire system with fuel lines and nozzles so that many different types of fire (location, intensity etc) can be closely controlled.

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 117 total)