Just remembered: Australian army and Eurocopter Tigre…
BTW, which customer is expressing ‘disappointment’ with F-35?
yes, Tiger too!
again, French make great helicopters. but when working with Germans..
you guys should’ve gone Mangusta or Cobra
IMO not the Su-35’s but a version based on the AL-31FM2 … if anyone’s interested; at least a theory:
By the way, Nice that You no longer insist on 23m ! 😀
23M is much closer to 22M than your 19M 😉
or in other words, Flanker sized (carrier).
so, can we go back to being lovers again? <3
it should put an end to your silly claims of it being 23 meters with tiny bays.
we will all know it is 19 to 20 meters.
we all know it is not a mig
we all know it has 4 bays.
and it uses chinese engines
22 meters plus or minus 1
sure 4 bays
sure it is not a mig
not sure about engines. probably will use su-35’s engines, cloned.
You are all wrong – it is clearly a copy of the MiG Ye-8…..
Ken
hi Ken and Ryu,
any results about the Ye-8? what they found about its design, stuff..
as for lavi and j-10
well its like the relationship between f-2 and f-16
looking at the new pics, i take back my comments on the j-20 paint
Talking about turn rate, an engineer made a similar comparision between USAF 4-5 gen aircraft ( equalize combat radius and weapon load )
http://www.f-16.net/forum/download/file.php?id=22895&sid=fceea8e076beb5734e1905ae96dd3c30
thankies.
didnt realize the F-35C was so much a better performer than the A and B
The US had to cut the Lavi program, the Lavi would have wiped out F-16 sales as no one wants to buy from the embargo-happy US and Israel will sell to anybody including their own enemies. To answer the main question, I think that Chinese fighters would be close to equal to the Lavi or any other 4th gen FBW fighter. People here seem to assume that the eurocanards and F-16 are far in advance aerodynamically, but I dont see it, I think its easier to make a good FBW fighter than most people here are willing to admit.
I agree, I think it would’ve been a good export success. most likely cutting into the sales of Gripen, Kfir/Nesher upgrades, maybe some Mirage 2000 and F-16.
I imagine the following countries would’ve ended up buying the Lavi if the US didn’t block it:
South Africa
India
Colombia
Ecuador
Sri Lanka
Thailand
Singapore
also IAI probably wouldn’t have helped China with the J-10.
China would be flying MiG-29s
you may also need a lot of tanks. a lot of t-72s are old and the m1s are too expensive and they seem to be vulnerable to ISIS
these would be good and affordable to buy in large quantity
also these
they will be important to expel the Turks from Iraqi territory.
If there is one country that is good at kicking Turks out, it is China wich has done it historically
Chinese weapons haven’t done good in real wars. granted they are the older versions.
Also, honestly who would choose the z-10 over the Mi-28?
although personally I’d choose the ka-52 over the mi-28
I’m actually very sad 🙁 really wanted to see the MiG35 in Iraqi colours 🙁
here you go, if it makes you feel better
Here’s one interpretation of what it means for the immediate future:
14 original il76, bought from russia decades ago. several second hand il76 (civilian variant) bought sometime by the 2000. (4 of which serve as awacs). 10 more second hand ones bought in recent few years via rosoboronexport. 3 il78 second hand il78 bought from ukraine. Total of 31 il76. Further il76 purchases unlikely due to y-20 coming online.
50-60 H6k produced to date, with production ongoing. One likely option would be to keep the production until all of PLAAF’s planes are replaced. That’d mean another 30ish or so airframes. Another option would be to have PLANAF’s planes replaced as well, eventually. If so, that’d mean another 30 or so planes. So total of some 90-120 h6k might be expected.Y20 currently being produced, so far maybe 6-8 airframes, including prototypes.
Assuming old il76 and second hand il76 need at least one set of new engines, which seems likely as engines last less longer than such airframes – that’s 31*4 engines for il76 fleet.
plus the h6k fleet – 180 to 240 engines needed.
plus y20 produced so far – lets say 30 engines.Plus one would need some sort of spare engine capacity. Western engines, as far as i can tell, are usually planned with 20 or percent extra engines. Maybe russian engines follow a different logic, with shorter lifespans, so i’ll guesstimate here with just 10% of extra engines.
Total could thus be: 124+180+30= 358 + 35 = ~366 if 90 h6k are planned.
if 120 h6k are planned that goes up to ~426.Which suggests to me there may be more engines ordered in the future, even if y20 somehow switches to another engine really soon.
Or course, more realistically, y20 will go on being produced with d30kp2 for some more time, a few years at least. Which could easely require up to a 100 additional engines.If we take into account that h6k are all brand new and will at one point in their life need engine replacement, even more future d30kp2 are going to be needed. Domestic engine variant of d30kp2 for just 200ish engines seems unlikely. And if ws18 was already ready – we wouldn’t see these d30kp2 ordered now. So i’d say ws18 engine plans were dropped at some point and h6k fleet may fly with russian made engines until they’re retired.
that link in your sig is surprisingly entertaining and fair.
but now Turkey and Russia are buddy buddy and willing to bend over for each other. maybe except for the assad thing
Some very interesting info.
http://bmpd.livejournal.com/2212133.html
China ordered 224 D-30KP2 engines from Saturn in July 2016, worth about 660 million USD.
Previously China bought 55 D-30KP2 from 2009-2011, and 184 engines of the type from a contract in September 2011.
Since 2009 China has bought 463 D-30KP2 from Saturn.
looks like they gave up trying to make a domestic engine for their Y-20.
Iraqi F16s, whilst good airframes with decent avionics are hobbled by a lack of advanced munitions since the US has refused to sell AMRAAMs AIM-9X and JDAMs to Iraq.
.
yeah, American stuff are great, but their politics (perhaps well intentioned for regional balance) sucks for the operator
thats why you have the French. go for Rafales and VBCIs
mon dieu
“Hot Air”?
Good old Song Wencong, fourth chap from the right…
[ATTACH=CONFIG]249316[/ATTACH]
there are 5 things c-bots hate to talk about, and do their best to avoid or deny
1. True size of J-20
2. Kamov’s involvement with the Z-10
3. Illegal copies of Flankers
4. Chinese commercial aviation international exports
5. and especially the Lavi to J-10 connection
Israel acknowledges the connection, the Russians also say there’s a connection
but no, c-bots think that the j-10 supposedly comes from the 3rd gen J-9 which is more or less a J-8 with canards.
lets totally forget that the original J-10 prototypes and models were more Lavi sized and had a similar intake

its pretty clear that they had to redesign it because they couldn’t get the right engine for the original model, and had to make an enlarged version to fit the Russian Engine
blk 2 JF-17s are being delivered with blk 3 AESA models being developed.
Tejas is still not in production, let alone in the 3rd phase of upgrades.the only argument you can cling on to is JF-17 not in plaaf service, which it was never intended for.
but get this.. its not even in PLAAF service, but it is still outproducing and outdeveloping the Tejas’ schedule lol.
I think the Tejas is the better plane
but JF-17 programme is better managed