Originally posted by sharmaji
article is dated April 10th 2004
It’s Islander scare tactics. No more no less!!!
I repeat… The article has been circulating throughout Chinese
web sites for months. It’s a repeat job. It’s garbage! It’s a boring piece
of crap sold by independent seekers of some island under the Chinese sun in the
hope of generating/firing up separation sentiment within the masses.And I thought you guys are the smart ones. How silly!!!
Originally posted by frankvw
Old MiG19 copies? Where is the threat?I never said that the j-6s was a threat. What I said was that
some of the things that they do house in those underground shelters, however,
can post a threat. Example: SAMs, SSMs, and in many instances, other much
deadlier aircrafts had been shown inside shelters like that.Originally posted by Indian1973
I came, I saw, I laughed.Well… it certainly is your perogative to laugh :). But, this thread
is not about the j-6s, it concerns something far more serious. It’s about mini-nukes
and why they are interested/considering it a part of their arsenalds.Originally posted by rockgordon
Threat? Coz they have ’em guns, you know! 😀Hey Rocky, Even with the J-6s, if they have enough of them, and
God knows that they do, it remains a danger to the forces in the theatre of military
operation if shelters like these keeps A/Cs away from harms way.Anyway, imagine those to be Chinese MiG-21(Es) or better and
that it’s armed with SD-10s and such instead of j-6s armed with sidewinders.
I’d bet Kim Jong Il the IInd. would have something to worry about if he ever tries to
cross over the Yalu River with his MiG-23s and such don’t you agree???l!!!
Re: 2006 and Taiwan invasion
Originally posted by sharmaji
Re: 2006 and Taiwan invasion
My my…
Seems someone’s really trying to stir up some East Asian feud
or sentiments here!!! Truth: That is old old news, something that most all
East Asians had passed up as a joke and never took as serious, if otherwise,
you would have seen that article clicked here in AFM eons ago.Nice try however :)!!!
Here’s another cool take:
.
Incidentally, once again charges of PSs are pending:

(zt of WMF)

(This one credited to Z3P of CMF)
Also, an update on the J-10:

i believe she was referring to this pic
Man, Oh Man!!! Once again, looks as if someone’s
agonizing over the irratation he has in the hinny again. Prep H! Yes! Prep H
is thing that’ll do the trick and not that mouth piece!!!
Source of above pic:
http://bbs13.xilubbs.com/cgi-bin/bbs/view?forum=zgyb&message=45104
(Beware! Notorious popups.)
Originally posted by Srbin
lol no, I think the only reason PAF went for FC-1 is because they couldn’t get more F-16s/upgrade existing ones. All the support and infrastructure for F-16s is already there.Pakistan didn’t just go with the FC-1 for a reason, they didn’t do it just cause they felt like it.
Well, it goes without saying: Yes, indeed such logic would apply to
any/all nations. I mean what other recourses are there for you except to shop
elsewhere if your normal supply line has all of a suddently been cut ???Example: If the Russians didn’t quit on the Chinese as they did
in the 50’s and 60’s and the experience of buying airplanes was like the ordering
of a happy meal from McDonald’s, in my view, the Chinese probably wouldn’t have
had the need or the incentive to develop their own Big Macs.Regardless, I’m sure the Pakistans wouldn’t want to give up their JF-17 now
that it’s proven a success. It’s a plane they had played a huge part in developing and
a plane which, in all truth, will help Pakistan jump start its aviation industry.From here, many great things will happen to both the Pakistani and the Chinese
aviation industry. The aviation industry of both nations are now standing firmly on their
own two feets. They now don’t need to beg others to keep their AF shipshape!!!
Originally posted by Srbin
I bet if Pakistan could get brand new
more advanced F-16s and upgrade existing they would
really probably ditch half of their FC-1s .My take:
I gather the reason for that is because you do not have much
confidence in things Chinese or things Pakistani. You may even lack confidence in
yourself cos of the competitive nature these projects are proving.Now, the “Made in China” syndrome:
If “Made in China” is so inferior to you, then,
why all of this “OUT SOURCING” outrage or this “China phobia”??? Why all
the fear-mongering about Chinese techs being at par with or maybe even
competitive to some from out of the west???“Remember: China did not express
those competitive fears and concerns — prominent and authoritative
sources from out of the west did!!!”More Examples:
Why do you, or some of you anyway, buy that rich and elegant-looking
dinning room suite which have this despised “Made in China” tag attached when you can
stick to something which says made in the UK or in Made in The US of A???Why do you buy the Made in China
tools that you do when you can stick to those of your own mfg if
Chinese handi-works are so inferior???Why do you wear the garment which says
“Made in China” when you can buy Martha Steward’s Made in the
good old US of As??? Why shop WalMarts???Sentimental feelings…
Yes, sentimental feelings — it’s a funny thing!!!!
It’s human nature I guess.
Originally posted by troung
“The FC-1 market is not those with access to American technology or those (like possibly in Egypt’s case) allied with the US to the point where American tech transfer is a possibility.”True. I don’t see the FC-1 being able to market in nations, which are closer US allies. Its not as much about the just the plane but about influence and such.
“If Pakistan has a F-16 assembly line, they would be building F-16s instead of JF-17s in a few years.”
No doubt.
“I say everything is pointing to a FC-1 prospect that is about as “grim” as the K-8’s which had a similiar degree of disadvantage to a F-16-like world beater/standard bearer in its class, the Hawk.”
Well a lot of the K-8s success in Egypt can also be pointed to the fact the UK can’t “sell” the Hawk like the Americans “sell” the F-16. In other words all but giving them away. The K-8 has had respectable success on the export market with sales to various nations around the world. Granted Burma, Sri Lanka and Pakistan getting it are not surprises, the Egyptian sale was a case of good marketing.
“First by Pakistan and then from all the other countries that for whatever reasons are using Chinese equipment today.”
True. Some of the less aligned nations could take a very serious look at the plane. Generally the Chinese market to nations which either are trying for a cheap arms build up (Iraq, Sri Lanka, Pakistan) or don’t have many friends (Burma). I would not be shocked in the least at the Bangladeshi buy of the FC-1 and/or K-8.
“why shouldnt PAF lobby USa if it could possibly get few F-16s for free out of aid.”
Once again did I say anything was wrong with the PAF still wanting the F-16A/B? In fact it makes a lot of sense why they would still want the plane even now.
“SD-10 and troung, your two way nationalist bickering is giving me a headache”
Who is a nationalist? Not me.
Outsourcing is the most mystical of all beasts evil…
It does not recogonize international borders; it can not differentiate
friends from competitors; it does not recogonize the color of the skin; its lifeline
is not based on the concepts of political ideologies….
Its life source is based on the logics and the realities of economics!!!
This thread more than any other should be the one to go “general forum”. No???
Moved???
Re: Two Jaguar jets go missing near LoC
Originally posted by KabirT
Two Jaguar jets go missing near LoC:
This region is well known for funny UFO sightings, abductions, etc.
Sightings of weird-looking creatures had been widely reported by the locals of this area.
This fact is well known throughout the world of UfO enthusiasts.
Originally posted by phrozenflame
To Troung: why shouldnt PAF lobby USa if it could possibly get few F-16s for free out of aid..(infact we paid for it already 😉 )i mean..why not? hell even if we had Rafales (e.g.) we would want free F-16s…
Fc-1 offers to Pak what F-16 will never offer..will Americans give us the blue prints of the planes?? ToT for avionics?? SC of the softwares…NO, FC-1 could be upgraded physically and and in terms of avionics at the time of PAF’s Choosing, F-16s wont offer that…
FC-1 or Free F-16s:
Indeed, why not if it’s already been
paid for??? It’s rightly and legally yours anyhow if international rules of law apply. But it doesn’t!Anyway, on to the FC-1/JF-17:
Accordingly, to this state
run media (PD), there is a total of four
different models for the FC-1.http://www.peopledaily.com.cn/GB/junshi/1076/2422703.html
While avionics and load capabilities are
primary differences. It is said here however that the fourth
model sports a totally different configuration.
Originally posted by Pete_sj
How can you determine the FC-1’s performance when its first flight was not even a year ago?70% performance of the F-16. How was this measured? Comparing pictures?
BTW, SD-10, The last picture you show is clearly of the SAAB Gripen.
German Typhoon.
Originally posted by SD-10
Haley
The top picture looks to me JL-9 and the other one is FC-1.This is i think J-10 Chengdu.
1) Thanks for the contribution, SD.
2) I think your pic is of German EF-2000. Reason” Canards too far in forward section.Nice pic however.
I wouldn’t laugh about it. There just may be an export version:
.
