What? Russia got to tbilisi in a week and completed its mission as tie eater fled and Georgian army was incapable of fighting.
What Russian army learned was to have better c&c equipment and radio equipment that they have now. Russia is rearming to deal with all threats. Your type said Russia would never go into Syria, now look?
Ukraine isn’t a major threat to Russia. Russian budget is high for procurement but don’t think they will all of a sudden stop purchasing weapons after sap2020, cause there is already procurement from 2018-2025. As well, costs are significantly less for such systems for Russia.
Your attempts at calling Russia incapable to fight a large conflict is not only stupid, but also shows lack of understanding how procurement costs and selections work.
BTW, Russia mobilized for Georgian conflict in 24h. Probably a record. Was the 58th army. Not even a large fraction of its capabilities. Overextending…. not even close.
Russia high tempo operation have forced Arab world and Turkey to build there own factories for ammunition . there is complete loss of confidence in West and deep psychological commotion.
http://www.arabnews.com/saudi-arabia/news/909571
There is more to destroying a single commercial vehicle than simply the purchase price. Consider the cost of having to run that mission again if the simpler or smaller option missile misses, or the presence of multiple targets and an inability to target all of them with the simpler missile at the same time. Finally the value of the individuals in the vehicle may be worth significantly more than the vehicle. Certainly in AFG the US was happy to drop multiple munitions on a single target to guarantee a kill instead of using a lighter less costly approach.
Militaries don’t generally consider the cost of the munition against the target, it is about the effectiveness of the munition against the target. Governments consider the cost of the munition at acquisition but within a conflict munition cost pales in comparison to the overall cost of the conflict. A more pressing factor may be availability of advanced munitions but in this case ATGMs are hardly breaking the bank.
Almot all US and its allies are facing bomb shortages in All Categories even with slow tempo of war. infact Suaids are building there own factory now with South Africa.
http://www.airforcemag.com/DRArchive/Pages/2016/January%202016/January%2005%202016/Yes,-There-Is-Bomb-Shortage.aspx
Yes, There Is Bomb Shortage
The Air Force is indeed experiencing a “shortfall” in “all categories” of munitions, due to the air campaign against ISIS over the last 15 months, but so far is “managing” its global stockpiles such that there’s no impact on operations yet, an Air Force spokeswoman told Air Force Magazine Monday. However, reloading will take up to four years, she said. Expanding on comments from USAF Chief of Staff Gen. Mark Welsh in early December that USAF is expending munitions “faster than we can replenish them,” the spokeswoman said that while USAF can “sustain” anti-ISIS operations for now,
Good thing this never happened.
For the Russians.. Everyone was getting a hard on a decade ago over this mock up because it had a good angle. but now that we have more clear shots. it’s pretty ugly, and a lot of the pilot is exposed in that huge bubble. I heard this seating also had center of gravity issues
For the Turks.. had they bought the Erdogan before the coming of Erdogan, the Erdogan would’ve been jeapordized by the Erdogan administration because Erdogan destroyed his relationship with Russia. This would’ve caused Erdogan to indirectly limit off spares and support for the Erdogan.
Erdogan was mayor of Istanbul. Russians already knew there is Erdogan present in Turkey in 90s. Putin himself mentioned his visit to Turkey when he was working in mayor office st petersburg. If they had chosen this Ka-50 in 1990s Turkey would be at same stage as it is with assembling F-16.
An article on af.mil website reads in part…
To me, “tomorrow’s high end threat environment” and “deliver airstrikes on any location in the world” means B-2.1 can survive a future IADS and still hit its targets. But remember, air combat is a team sport. There are no lone eagles.
USAF stopped buying B-2 to F-22 to F-15 in less than 20 years after first flight. Those time airdefence and missile technology was not even progressing so fast .
Or they given money to buy systems for coalition of willing.
But that’s impossible, the Il-76 has a perfect cargo hold cross section and the An-70 was a stupid idea :dev2:
An-70 is shorter range and slow. Helicopter can fly by themselves with multiple stops. or by ships. Not even twin engine cargo like Kc-390 use unreliable prop. C130 fly hour cost is as much as C17.
they did the practice runs. attacking small tenches.
http://tass.ru/en/defense/868710
from the looks. Mi-28 seems to me better armoured protected. i will use it in close combat environment like in city. while Ka-50 more sutiable for desert and mountain for hitting transport or antiship/anti air against UAVs. every one has now UAV.
Experience in recent wars has shown that bombers have the endurance to provide coverage even when operating from a thousand miles away.
which experiance you are reffering to?. even in non existing SAM situation most of combatants have fled to fight another day. operating from thousands of miles limit weopon load and create pilot fatigue that decrease sorties number with high acccuracy.
Yes but the true long-range sea-based analogue to the S-400 will only be fielded by a couple of navies (US, Japan, Australia) with the SPY-1D(V) [GaN based AMDR in the AB Flight III ships] and SM-3+SM-6 combination.
Where you get idea there is naval equal to S400 by these navies?
Dude
I thank God that IRIS-T (which equip among the other a/c the Italian Typhoons) are not used in combat and I blame EF consortium for not having integrated yet the Meteor on the subject of this topic.
Italy and Turkey are different countries – AW just sold the Mangusta project to TAI – whatever TAI wants to put on the copter is their exclusive business.As for “guided bombs in huge quantities”, Rwm Italia Spa, an Italian firm controlled by German Rheinmetall, produces in Sardinia the bombs the Saudis are using in Yemen and the French are using in MO (not that I am particullarry fond of it).
http://www.sardiniapost.it/cronaca/lisola-delle-bombe-nuovi-ordini-per-225-milioni-alla-rwm-di-domusnovas/
But I don’t expect that you can discern where is Sardinia.
those are not guided bombs.
http://www.rheinmetall-defence.com/en/rheinmetall_defence/company/divisions_and_subsidiaries/rwm_italia/
It costs $386m to buy 3000 guided bombs from US. US has economies of scale. Same amount of guided bombs from EU may cost over $1b.
http://www.defenseworld.net/news/15770/Australia_Orders_Boeing_GBU_39_Bombs_Worth__386_Million#.Vwcpt6QrKhc
new internet testing.
http://tass.ru/en/defense/867990
Russian servicemen test high-speed military Internet in Syria operation
This Syria operation gave confidence about tempo and reliability of systems.
http://www.newsweek.com/russian-parliament-speaker-compares-baltics-trained-dogs-444683
Top U.S. official: U.S. would block sale of Russian Su-30 aircraft to Iran
i doubt it has impact unless the bank does not fillup.
http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/first-islamic-bank-to-open-in-russia–.aspx?PageID=238&NID=96810&NewsCatID=346
:sleeping:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meteor_%28missile%29
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IRIS-TJust to name a few “weopons” for which Italian firms are partners.
I am not referring to the weopons that are rarely used. Italy still simply cant produce competitive missiles and guided bombs in huge quantities that are required for round the clock operations in Middleast.
how many Italian weopons are in that T129?
http://www.defensenews.com/story/defense/policy-budget/policy/2015/11/08/turkish-officials-wonder-if-and-when-us-ok-weapons-exports/75112260/
The most recent example of how politics can interfere with Turkey’s weapons procurements was a $70 million sale of Joint Direct Attack Munitions (JDAM) kits to Turkey, cleared by the State Department on Oct. 29. That clearance, which was on hold for more than 570 days, paves the way for Turkey to replenish its weapon stocks in its ongoing strikes against the PKK.
A Turkish defense official admitted that Turkey’s stocks of US-made smart ammunition has visibly diminished after serial airstrikes against Kurdish militant strongholds in northern Iraq since July 20, when the Kurds ended a 2013 cease-fire
What are you actually referring to here, the concurrency cost to bring LRIP jets up to standard or per hour flight cost and depot level maintenance?
I haven’t seen anything indicating that depot level maintenance on the F-35 is going to be more expensive than a Eurocanard. Looking forward in 7 years there will be more F-35s than total Eurocanard production put together, which should drive both per hour and overhaul costs down.
producing more does not make aircraft cheaper. try to buy updated version of F-16E/F-15SA in 2016 prices. it will be atleast three times the prices of F-18E that Australia purchased in 2007. the more you produce it mean you have to maintain bigger industrial chain for maintainance.