dark light

JSR

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,341 through 2,355 (of 4,319 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Dassault Rafale, News & Discussion (XV) #2210052
    JSR
    Participant

    You’re missing the point of the T1 argument entirely. Its being pitched not as a substitute to the T3 but as a supplement. What is the cost of an aircraft (with residual life) that’s being retired early? Just for reference, the entire 40 strong fleet of British Harrier IIs was sold to the USMC for $50 million. That’s $50 million total, not $50 million each.

    I don’t know what the cost of used EF T1s would be, but the evidence suggests they’ll be damn cheap. Which makes it a fantastic opportunity for any customer looking for a good deal, and doubly so for an air force as desperate for MiG replacements as the IAF.

    cheap does not mean pilot training and maintainance will be cheap . There is no point is wasting skilled resources.

    You find few who concur on the last point. The Indian military’s list of stated and pending requirements comfortably outstrip its current resources.

    You were the first made $100b dollar claim.

    in reply to: Kazakhstan Air Force in 2020 #2210174
    JSR
    Participant

    its a difference of scale. a few dozen from a country of a billion vs several hundred from a country of 17 million.

    hehe so you really can count those who produce more.

    but this probably doesn’t matter to you since you are a closet ISIS supporter. But some of us see the risk to Russia and actually don’t want the problem to spread there.

    ISIS is fusion of Western EU and Middleast. It has nothing to do Kazakh or China. I don’t want give you further dose of reality.
    Russia is continuously doing exercise near Europe. so potential threat from EU. infact EU near complete dependence on Middleast make it more of a failed state.

    I also suggest you follow TR1’s suggestion to stop going off topic.

    you went offtopic first.

    Perhaps they should be spending more on helicopters and border defense, seeing how many Kazakhs are joining ISIS. Russia be warned

    The most effective weopon against ISIS is Su-30SM equipped with brahmos/Kh-31. you can practically implement embargos on ships and air in Middleast.

    in reply to: Kazakhstan Air Force in 2020 #2210394
    JSR
    Participant

    actually you don’t know much about former soviet union.
    many kazakhs are in ISIS now

    in fact a kazakh isis boy killed two supposed russian agents not too long ago. go google it for the full video

    so China also has ISIS problem. the most efficient government on this planet.

    you have to differentiate with between few deranged people and society as whole.

    http://www.foxnews.com/world/2015/03/11/chinese-authorities-say-muslim-uighurs-have-joined-isis/

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (2015) #2210395
    JSR
    Participant

    The new engine will cost more but will lead to big saving in fuel over the service life of the plane. And the range will be increased by 30-40%, which means fewer tanker sorties.

    fuel savings are irrelevant for such costly project across the industrial chain.
    the point is the new engine will not give much better speed than Mach 1.6. Post 2020 is era of hypersonic missiles. Indian integration of brahmos with Su-30MKI is first step. Airplane with larger external wings and higher altitude/speed is the advantage.

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (2015) #2210521
    JSR
    Participant

    I highly doubt new engine is coming as this engine already expensive due to lack of its use in 4 generation fighters. beside most export customers like Japan, Australia, Norway, Turkey, Netherlands, Italy, Israel, UK has currency depreciated 30 to 80%. this will be very slow ramp up.

    in reply to: Kazakhstan Air Force in 2020 #2210522
    JSR
    Participant

    can you post a pic? all the ones on google image are the dark grey ones with a white radome

    good points! but I was also thinking of the broader Flanker family including the Su-34 and 35. is the SM replacing any thing in particular?

    Perhaps they should be spending more on helicopters and border defense, seeing how many Kazakhs are joining ISIS. Russia be warned.

    They spending a lot but these jets are needed to create coalition of willing.
    your confusing the country with other less wealthy

    http://www.economist.com/news/asia/21597006-president-wants-change-what-country-called-dont-call-me-stan
    Kazakhstan’s name
    Don’t call me Stan
    The president wants to change what the country is called

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2210721
    JSR
    Participant

    Jesus.
    Get your facts straight.

    The Su-34 was a product of SU times, and the aftermath of SU.
    No funding = 12 year delay.

    Su-35S
    2008 = lots of aviable funding.
    Su-35S took over 6 years to get IOC.

    Still, not impressive though..

    Su-35 is much complex fighter with uprated engine certification, complex FBW/TVC systems, significant fuel increase without dorsal hump, advanced digital cockpit. they are outstanding they could certify such complexity in 6 years.
    Su-34 is low g simple overweight bomber project.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2210844
    JSR
    Participant

    Try 5 years.. and still counting.
    Sure the Su-35S officialy entered service in 2013/14. Don’t care, it flew much earlier.
    Even now that it is in service we see it being further developed.

    That Indian Article on PakFa might have someting to it, the Su-35S has been severly deleyed over the years. Consider its prototype flew back in February 2008.

    And now we see a similar road for the PakFa, so perhaps it was time for Mr Pogo to leave the helm..

    Su-34 is delayed by 10 years. that’s why this Su-30SM exist to make the numbers. Su-35 is not that delayed considering Su-34 history.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2210954
    JSR
    Participant

    IIf you like to believe the F-22’s designers were just a bunch of idiots, how do you explain the obvious incompetence of the Su-35’s designers? How could they have screwed up so badly that only 2 years after the first flight of the final version of their new fighter that the PAK FA would fly… with all the same features and more, plus a bunch of LO features and internal bays… and all while weighing less and outperforming their new fighter in every way?

    you do realize that cost and objective of Su-35 and PAK-FA are not the same. so it does not matter if they enter same time into service let alone 2 years apart.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2211033
    JSR
    Participant

    That isn’t to say the PAK FA won’t be a great plane, but this is getting to be another Mig-25 scenario where it is supposed to be the world’s greatest everything, all at once, but the world just doesn’t work that way.

    who claimed MIG-25 world greatest? if it was world greatest Flanker/Fulcrum would not have been started early 70s. Su-35 is not built by soviet system those people either went to west or left over in republics. My predictions is Su-35 will outperform its publish specifications.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2211125
    JSR
    Participant

    Su-35 with 11,300kg fuel and 4 AAM has 3600km range. PAK-FA is more aerodynamic. over 4000km range is not of out realm.
    http://www.uacrussia.ru/ru/aircraft/lineup/military/su-35/aircraft-specific/

    futuristic combats need big sensors, weopons flexbility, jammers, speed, sustain range, acceleration, high altitude only heavy twin fighter can provide.
    small jets like J-10 is relic of 1980s.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2211167
    JSR
    Participant

    its not some joke. for Tax revenue stock market need to be higher and higher stock market need profits. so LM has to produce profits by selling at higher price.
    Above all private transport of producing millions of cars mean more workers and resources consumed by it.
    Toyota is now coming to Texas.

    http://www.latimes.com/business/autos/la-fi-toyota-texas-20140428-story.html
    Toyota Motor Corp. plans to move large numbers of jobs from its sales and marketing headquarters in Torrance to suburban Dallas, according to a person familiar with the automaker’s plans..

    It happen to Southern California Aerospace in past. and if California water situation not solved. Expect a lot of shifting to Texas. LM will have to raise wages to California level.
    Sukhoi is immune from weather, resources and population shifts. even in worst time of 1990s it still produced large number of jets.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2211172
    JSR
    Participant

    It isn’t just the weight…

    Almost certainly the weight number is way low, but also in terms of the range, speed, and handling capabilities. You can’t optimize a design for everything at once.

    If you want great short-field performance and low/slow handling you are going to give up some performance at high speed, etc. The way people have been describing the PAK FA thus far it is like they took every spec and every feature anyone has discussed for any aircraft, increased them all by 20-100% and attributed them to the PAK FA.

    …and cost will be another factor. This aircraft as described pretty much pegs the scale for cost. Two huge engines, huge airframe, huge avionics fit with more sensors, etc, than any other aircraft. It will be beastly expensive.

    PAK-FA is made of composites. so it will be light. and it will be cheaper considering labor, material and energy rates.
    http://www.ruaviation.com/news/2013/11/19/2054/
    wages in west are inflated due to huge financial and media/e-commerce sector.

    in reply to: USAF not F-35 thread #2211205
    JSR
    Participant

    Well they’re fortunate that Egyptian military junta decided to splurge on arms during an economic crunch, else that ‘strategic decision’ might have landed Dassault Aviation with the first clean-sheet design to fail to get a single export order. As it is, production has been squeezed down to a trickle to make the annual intake affordable to the French state. With the basic French fighter industry wrapping up by 2020 or so (though allied segments will persevere, similar to Israel), closely followed by the remainder of the European industry by 2023 (when the Gripen E transits out of production), the question of how justified that decision to preserve ‘national capabilities’ was, may have a disheartening answer.

    Actually Egypt is not in economic crunch as far as Rafale purchase is concerned. why they only order 24 that’s more relevant. if it so advanced and without restriction they should build airforce around Rafale. You wont find biggest supporter of arabs than france.
    EF is also not doing better only 44 delivered to RSAF in 8 years.

    in reply to: USAF not F-35 thread #2212113
    JSR
    Participant

    The exact oposite…
    The major upgrades on the Tornado fmk3 we’re made in its last decade of life, and they were quite massive; by comparison with it’s 1986 deployement plan the mk3 was retired a full decade before it was suposed to, on the other hand the Jag’s, harriers, sea harriers (and Bucaners) all outlived their original planned retirement by a very handsome margin.
    The RAF has a past record of upgrading the platforms that it uses right to their retirement, it’s entirely conceivable that the Phoon will get this same treatment.

    First the upgrades were not massive. and second you cant extrapolate future from past performance considering all other limitations going on industrial and financial sector. Scale of Al Yamamah exports declining relative to past and north sea is running ouf of oil.

Viewing 15 posts - 2,341 through 2,355 (of 4,319 total)