A-100 will I am sure used technologies developed for IL-478 that give enhanced range plus high production rate upto 21 a year for IL476/IL478/A100 make over all cost cheaper along with same pilot training.
The only airfields that and A-50 (or E-3) AWACS aircraft can operate from are those airfields which are equipped to handle such an aircraft. Mostly big airfields, with long smooth runways.
Big AESA radar with various pods/electronics in wing, nose and tail make aircraft even more heavier and hence airlifter is needed for shorter runway. now headphone and confortable ergonomic chair is advanced enough that no need for civil airlines . AWACS also not have windows which is more common with transport . Off course too wide transport like C17/Y20 not suitable.
A-100 also has wingtip pods and larger antenna for the platform size.


Point is though if the F-35 is not right because Belgians have no business being in the middle east etc, what is right?
I already post about Italy procurement. now even operating deployment is getting reduced which was basically a static mission. now think of unloading cost of F-35 on Belgium.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-italy-defence-niger/italy-pm-plans-to-shift-military-forces-from-iraq-to-niger-idUSKBN1EI0E2
Italy PM plans to shift military forces from Iraq to Niger
The Su-24/An-72 are basically on expired life. I have never seen any transport park near to fighters. by now we would have seen photos of it.
Yeah I doubt that to put it mildly.
it took AdA over 2 years to carry out 2,300 sorties (lets take Iraq and Syria together, because their Syria figures are….small), unless I am wildly off,
https://translate.google.com/transla…hp&prev=search
VKS carried out over 23,000 sorties in a shorter time frame…. https://function.mil.ru/news_page/co…2120736@egNews
Last edited by TR1; 3rd January 2018 at 03:23.
by late August they already approaching 30K fighter sorties. bomber and combat chopper sorties over top of it.
https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/defense/2017-09-21/extent-russian-uav-use-over-syria-revealed
the grand total of UAV flights has exceeded 14,000. But this is still only half of the total flown by manned Sukhoi combat jets, at 28,000 sorties (for 90,000 air strikes). No statistics have been made available for helicopters, but they are understood to be making as many as 100 sorties daily to fire-support the Syrian troops.
If the Belgians do go ahead and order the F-35, they’ll still only be sixth “US suburb” in Europe after UK, Italy, Norway, Netherlands & Denmark. With Spain, Finland, Germany & Poland waiting in the wings, its unsurprising that the “do what’s right for Europe” argument doesn’t generate much traction with the BAC. That Europe is running three parallel overlapping fighter programs is certainly not the fault of the Belgians.
spain, finland, Germany and Poland cannot afford current fighter upgrades let alone F-35. and that assuming the new EU rules of joint development further crimped there funding.
this is Italy procurement. almost third largest military power in EU.
https://www.defensenews.com/global/europe/2017/08/14/italy-defense-budget-drops-in-2017/
The procurement total is made up of spending of €2.14 billion by the defense ministry and top-up spending of €2.55 billion by Italy’s Ministry for Economic Development, which is exclusively spent on Italian industrial defense programs
The thing is they are not the only Gulf state doing this, the last twelve months has been a veritable buying spree amongst the Sunni ruled GCC states! They are all putting in big ticket purchases from multiple sources.
last twelve months have been good for energy and metal prices. Pallidium is the star.
In my opinion the penny is finally starting to drop that the Oil is finite and very few of them have properly prepared for life after Oil. Ironically Persian Iran having spent decades outside is sitting on huge reserves of Oil and Gas plus unlike the Arab states has the ability to feed itself due to its large tracts of farmable land.
It does not matter what reserves they are sitting on it. the price of protection and extraction of those reserves going up. the more they remove subsidies the higher the will pay salaries from Pilots to everything else in that economic system.
All those Tu-22M3M/Tu-160M/Tu-95MSM with latest missiles will create the sustainable strike capability.
(Good lord I am starting to sound like JSR!)
yup the slow turn around.
SM3 also has new datalink and twice effective in air to air.
https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/defense/2012-01-20/russian-air-force-takes-upgraded-su-27s-intended-china
The onboard communications complex is jam-proof and provides a secure datalink with ground command posts and airborne assets. According to Sukhoi the Su-27SM(3) is more than twice as effective against aerial targets and three times more effective against ground targets than the Su-27S.
Janes on Kh-50
well the missile is stealthy, low altitude cruise, self protection devices, long range and can be carried on long range fast and loitering platforms. what else needed for sustainable round the clock strikes.
What does Russia buy from Katar to have an intrest to lower its debts by military sales?! Katar is not intrested in ground forces posing a constant danger to the regime.
Russia does not need to buy anything from katar to squeeze money out of it.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-qatar-military/qatar-russia-sign-agreements-on-air-defense-supplies-idUSKBN1CV11E
Qatar, Russia sign agreements on air defense, supplies
Well if they can fund Sudan better its good for Russian exports. previously Sudan was funded well by Saudis but we have to see what role Sudan airforce play.
http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article64352
Sudan, Russia and Qatar hold military discussions in Khartoum
why make such statement unless its for entertainment and sarcasm.
https://sputniknews.com/middleeast/201712271060341967-usa-syria-base-blocked/
US Base in At Tanf Fully Blocked by Syrian Troops
in only 8 months building for missile force academy. the fastest construction. UAV pics inside.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FRz6f3Jqwgg
The one weapon the Rafale cannot offer is the US B-61 and that IMO is why the German Air Force remain keen on a US airframe.
Germany is too small and too close to France that it does not need separate weopon.
Well Chinese concluded that previous Tu-154M crashes are due to human error. they still using it for intelligence gathering.
http://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy-defence/article/2125535/how-ageing-russian-passenger-jet-became-key-part-chinas
How an ageing Russian passenger jet became a key part of China’s military intelligence gathering
Compared with the civil aviation industry, the PLA air force had a much stricter maintenance system – which it further strengthened after the two fatal crashes.
Its pilots are also better trained to cope with critical operations and are often more experienced.