Hey TR1, a while ago (page ~80) of this thread, you mentioned prices for Su-30SM and Su-35S. It was figured for ~50 jets it was 60B rubles and for Su-30SM, ~38(?) jets it was 60B rubles. Now with the supposed upgrades for Su-30SM (some coined SM1), since it replaces all foreign parts with local, would the price come down to same level as Su-35S? Or do you think it will still retain a higher price
export price of Su-35 is higher than Su-30SM. it is the local parts that are expensive as they are more advanced and designed for higher standards of Ruaf.
the point I am making is atleast on paper you can aim for newer technology for some thing that will enter service 20 years down the road. by that time it will be equipped with 40 year old technology.
http://phazotron.kret.com/media/letayushchie-radary/
The PAK FA radar system consists of a prospective AFAR X-band in the nose, two side-view radars, and a L-band AFAR along the flaps.Today CRET also works on the creation of a radio-optical radar for PAK FA. The concern intends to create a full-scale sample of the radar station of the future until 2018.
Photonic technologies will allow to expand the radar’s possibilities – to reduce the mass more than twice, and to increase the resolution tens of times. Such radars with radio-optical phased array antennas are able to make a kind of “X-ray image” of aircraft located at a distance of more than 500 kilometers and give their detailed, three-dimensional image. This technology allows you to look inside the object, find out what technique it carries, how many people are in it, and even to see their faces.
Further slides show the 15W HPA will be used in the KF-X’s AESA T/R Modules. Assuming a Single Channel design and 1000 TRMs per Radar that’s a peak power of 15kW. Not sure how that compares to other airborne AESAs.
This process is 2013 for building those GaN MMIC. It will be obsolete by the time KFX enter service with obsolete engines.
http://www.winfoundry.com/doc/Paper/WIN-P14-001.pdf
In 2013, WIN demonstrated
their first 0.25 μ m GaN technology and transistor
performance operating in X-band [6~7] and thereafter a
program to develop high volume production capability in
terms of yield is being executed at WIN Semiconductor
When Rogozin involved results are always concrete .
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2017-09/07/c_136592444.htm
Russia-China cooperation yields concrete results: Putin
It’s no just Trump. Israel already received F35 and than maybe Turkey. The rest is China.
Err.. the TLAM-D was very much in service in 1991. IOC – 1986.
The shift away from low-level tactics for the USAF came in the wake of the Vietnam war and probably more importantly – the 1973 Yom Kippur war where Egyptian AD effectively blocked IAF strikes. SA-2s & SA-3s had the upper altitudes covered but when the IAF tried to go in low (as it did in ’67) it ran into SA-7 (Strela-2) equipped infantry, with the SAMs covered by AAA, forcing the jets to climb.. right back into the SAM envelop. Fast forward 9 years to the Bekaa Valley – entirely different outcome. In the USAF’s case – you had the F-117 (coming in roughly at the same time as the Tornado) while the F-15E was selected to replace the F-111
yeah despite all that India invested one of the largest sums in Jaguar.
Sure. But that was the kind of just-in-case planning that equipped the F-22 with TVC. Also, keep in mind that the B-2 is VLO at all altitudes. Any low-level flights will taken place at night-time; minimal threat from optical systems with similar resistance to EM-guided SAMs while staying clear of low-frequency EW radar.
VLO at all altitudes? what is VLO and what is all altitude?. what is its range at tree top height?
There is a need to put up the S-300/400, Buk-M2, Pantsir-S1/2 @ DEZ airbase to secure the whole of DEZ and the vast oil fields which is being targeted by the Jihadi coalition. The biggest threat the Syrian/Russian/allied forces is going to face is not the radical Jihadis, but the International Jihadi coalition and their aircrafts. We will see soon enough if the Russians have the balls to face off that Jihadi coalition.
creating so big airdefence network in desert where heat is similar to Qatar means airconditioned base with large electric and water supply. more effective way is to increase number of Su-35 and equipped them with RVV-BD missiles.
If you see a halt in the operation limiting it to the western banks of the Euphrates, make no doubt, Russia do not have to stomach to carry on… and Syria looses its largest oil fields to the Jihadi coailation.
Even the more developed Iraki Kurdistan need upfront Russian loans. Syrian part is way underdeveloped. US has unique ability to deal with allies so Russia want to keep US in same battlespace.
FIFY
http://www.stopfake.org/en/ukraine-d…ssile-engines/
http://www.newsweek.com/trump-north-…entists-649702They tried it before
http://www.businessinsider.com/video…secrets-2017-8
“The early bird gets the worm but the second mouse gets the
They already one time admitted illegal export of missiles from year 2000 to 2005. these are full missiles not just paper technology transfer. They had that joint development of An-140 with Iran also. who want to give leadership to Ukraine to built a plane.
https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2005_05/Ukraine
Ukraine Admits Missile Transfers
Ukrainian officials have acknowledged that a total of 12 Kh-55 medium-range, air-launched cruise missiles capable of carrying nuclear warheads were transferred from Ukraine to Iran and China in the last five years
now they are building similar project with Saudis. military doctorine around Antonov with technology transfer when basically every subsystem to make the plane fly is imported from west.
http://english.alarabiya.net/en/business/aviation-and-transport/2016/12/26/Saudi-general-lauds-tie-up-with-Ukraine-for-jet-manufacture.html
“A Saudi plane with Ukrainian partnership would contribute to the development of the military doctrine of the armed forces of Saudi Arabia,” according to Retd. Major General Mohammed Alqbeban.
Nevertheless, Ukraine has a desire for partnership and to open up to the Middle East, and most of all, the desire for transfer of technology. It was something of a challenge when dealing with Western countries.”
Thanks to Ukraine, North Korea have working ICBM with thermonuclear warhead. If mad Trump attack North Korea, than Kim will do his best to sink California to the Pacific ocean. Thermonuclear ICBMs are the best guaranties, that US will not attack North Korea and to secure peace there.
I doubt california has any worth. it is built on unstable desert geography with complete import based economics. i am very generous to use the word economic to include everything.
Su-34 is 20% heavier (MTOW 45.4tons)than Su-30MK and has 33% more range. It also have much larger front with wide raised cockpit. I presume it should have 50% more fuel. plus that 1000kg pods on the wingtip.
those helicopter crew and support staff will be dealing with 50 centigrade heat in Syrian desert. they fly low.
Originally Posted by Vnomad
Russia would engage in full scale war against the US, dogfights and all… to defend Kim Jong Un and Juche socialism?
you should check the definition of word “full scale”. what about half scale and one fourth scale?
I wouldn’t be surprise Trump is doing this as favor to Russia by escalating in Korea. Already tourist and factories are fleeing Korea. hot war will make North Korea victory assured as people in South simply cant live in that standard of living. they don’t have oil like Iraq.
After the war only Russia can rebuild that new Korea with Turkish contractors help. Germany knows that result.
https://www.thelocal.de/20170811/merkel-condemns-verbal-escalation-with-north-korea-after-trump-tweets
Chancellor Angela Merkel said on Friday that she opposed any use of force to resolve the conflict with North Korea, after President Donald Trump said the US military was “locked and loaded”
With hardly 30 fixed winged aircrafts at the disposal to service the entire Syrian theatre and 8 x dumb bombs on a normal basis is not going to cut it. Theoretically, even if 30 aircraft are airborne at a time, it brings to the table ordnance only enough for 240 targets over the entire Syria theatre. Then for the next 2-3 hours its going to be without any air support.
you are forgetting Syrian airforce. there effectiveness increased in Ruaf presence. so the total bombs drop per day is a lot higher.
Those sensors help in ground support like artillery/MLRS units.
https://sputniknews.com/military/201609151045349379-armored-su34-analysis/
Among the other benefits of an armored Su-34 is its capability to climb and cruise at heights between 8,000 and 12,000 m, allowing the pilot to familiarize himself with the tactical situation on the ground with the help of onboard sensors before swooping down for attack
Rostec and China.
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2017-08/31/c_136569288.htm
The portfolio of contracts that have been signed by Rostec’s military export subsidiary and have entered into force exceeds 45 billion U.S. dollars. More than 15 percent of this amount comes from cooperation with China,” Chemezov said in a recent interview with Xinhua.Rostec not only supplies China with military hardware but also transfers technology and conducts joint research with China on tanks, warplanes and guns, he said.
‘Bankrupt Eastern EU’ ??
I wonder how they got that way ?Did it have anything to do with Russia’s raping and pillaging for over 40 yrs ?
yup Karl Marx was Russian and all that practical commie leadership that was born in Ukraine was also Russian. and all those steel mills and heavy armour factories that were built in Ukraine based on russian technical knowledge was also Russian decision.
Doesn’t it look strange that country with no nuclear technology produce 50% of electric from nuclear power. and they were building more chernobyly stop it.
http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/country-profiles/countries-t-z/ukraine.aspx
Ukraine is heavily dependent on nuclear energy – it has 15 reactors generating about half of its electricity
In the hypothesis of a war between Russia and NATO, given the bases and weapons the USA has on the japanese islands, given the role as SSBN’s bastion played by Okhotsk Sea and the likes, how many hours long would Japan stand still and neutral?
Better to say: How long couldJapan be able to mantain his neutrality, provided but not granted it would have any will at all to stay neutral?
Japan and Korea will stay neutral or start leaning towards Russia. its the economic. scientific, resource exploitation, climatic and demographic changes.
https://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/tech/2017/08/419_235581.html
http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/tech/2017/08/693_234983.html
