dark light

JSR

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 451 through 465 (of 4,319 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2160345
    JSR
    Participant

    This is the performance of current slot array radar. with AESA it will be some where in 400 to 500km with over 60 track.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2160388
    JSR
    Participant

    MIG-35 top speed now 2700km/hr. i will not surprized domestic verision above 3000km/hr.

    https://sputniknews.com/science/201707151055574588-maks-top-five-new-entries/
    The observer pointed out that the new plane “has a greater range, a top speed of nearly 2,700 km per hour [300 km more than the base MiG-35], and new engines with a thrust-vectoring module, allowing pilots to perform the most complicated aerobatic maneuvers, as well as modern on-board electronic equipment. The MiG-35S’s radar can track up to 30 air targets from distances 160 km away,” and ship targets up to 300 km away.

    in reply to: Korea's KF-X: News & Discussion #2161150
    JSR
    Participant

    Um, those are not sensors and they won’t help you if it’s you that is out at the pointy end of the spear.

    why they can’t help when fight is under formation of Flankers and MIG31BM2.

    A properly designed AESA system is not overweight so are you saying that is what’s keeping it out of the Mig-29?

    All western fighters have gained weight despite using composite materials and practically no engine upgrades. Ruaf is not in rush to introduce mediocre AESA as they are working on 400km+ BVR missile and I presume next generation of standoff missile will hit targets at much greater distance. so much radar advancement is needed that it can differentiate dummy and real airdefence systems and fighters right on runway. For small fighter aesa incremental upgrade in radar performance is worthless. MIG29 is small relative to Flanker.

    in reply to: Airbus: European Future Fighter Program #2161562
    JSR
    Participant

    I highly doubt anything will come out of this fighter project. EU simply can’t develop military product on 5G scale. and in less than 5 years very different kind of liabilities are coming.

    in reply to: Korea's KF-X: News & Discussion #2161565
    JSR
    Participant

    Since radar remains the primary sensor on an aircraft, it most certainly is relevant to the discussion.

    The primary sensor of fighter is communication and netcentric capability with ground command and control network. Pay attention to Middleastern wars. It’s the multibillion dollar airbases that most important . see Qatar example airbase can’t be moved despite how much Trump allies in Saudi and UAE wish.
    AESA radar can’t change the aerodynamic performance of both fighter and weopns . Overweight AESA radar may decrease fighter range and performance.

    in reply to: Korea's KF-X: News & Discussion #2162877
    JSR
    Participant

    It is not budget thing as far as Ruaf is concerned. They are getting TVC Su-30SM .try implement TVC in western fighter and see what happens to cost. plus the EW Pods that are bigger EA-18G. MIG29M2/MIG-35 designed ground up to be faster, fly higher and 50% further upto 3500km range with 3ET. this the most complex aerodynamic change. radar is very cheap part.

    in reply to: Korea's KF-X: News & Discussion #2170894
    JSR
    Participant

    yup with under power engines ,small nose and overworked airframes you are going to produce competitive fighter to MIG29 which is second to none in combat performance. Russian engines are always superior and less maintaince intensive . Look at sortie rates of Su-24/Su-25.

    in reply to: Korea's KF-X: News & Discussion #2170959
    JSR
    Participant

    Those aircrafts are not with weak engines and small nose like old F16

    in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2171012
    JSR
    Participant

    WARSAW, Poland — Polish Deputy Defence Minister Tomasz Szatkowski has announced plans by Warsaw to acquire fifth-generation fighter jets around 2025.

    i am skeptical they will have money for it considering what is in store. Poland need order F-35 now.

    in reply to: Korea's KF-X: News & Discussion #2171057
    JSR
    Participant

    If software was able to overcome the benefits of 3 generations of AESAs then they would never have invented AESA

    yup Israel is installing those AESA radars on hundreds of F-16 despite among first to put AESA on AWACS. Even French are upgrading M2K with AESA radar. India also following them with AESA upgrades to M2K. did i miss Sweden and its Meteor qualification without AESA radar on Gripen. and it is nothing compared to Ruaf MIG-29SMT with latest radar and IRST.

    http://www.migavia.ru/images/MODELS/MiG-29SMT-782cButowski.jpg

    first understand what is happening in practical world. look all those F-18/F-15/B-1/B-52/A-10 flying around in Middleastern wars.

    in reply to: Korea's KF-X: News & Discussion #2171375
    JSR
    Participant

    F-16 is consider small size like Gripen. Those MSA radars continously upgraded. or do you think they not updating software.

    in reply to: Korea's KF-X: News & Discussion #2171417
    JSR
    Participant

    smaller AESA radars not much effective untill this point whether it is in fighter or AWACS. look at the definition of next generation fighter. MIG always had the correct approach to fighters. I have more confidence in MIG29SMT than anything else in that category.

    https://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2017/06/23/business/23reuters-airshow-paris-russia-mig.html
    Tarasenko dismissed the importance of grouping jets into “generations,” and said the MiG-35 was already “stronger, smarter and more versatile” than fourth-generation jets, but not as expensive as fifth-generation aircraft that can evade radar.
    “It will be barely noticeable on the radar – due to the reduction of the reflecting surface, the special radio-absorbing coating, and electronic radio-suppressing equipment,” he said

    Tarasenko said Russia was already working on new aircraft that would be “smarter, faster” and with increased range and a higher top ceiling range.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2171442
    JSR
    Participant

    I am sure with Russian weopons and intelligence Turkey willl be more effective power. i think Turkey has some good insights into Western systems either through itself or Qatar that Russia seem so interested in cooperating with it.

    in reply to: Korea's KF-X: News & Discussion #2171736
    JSR
    Participant

    That Su-30MKM outperfirmed what ever was offered for F-18E for RMAF in 2002. I am sure the high power ZHUK outperform the single engine fighter AESA.

    in reply to: Korea's KF-X: News & Discussion #2171801
    JSR
    Participant

    I’ve see several presentations that say FA-50 can mount the AMRAAM.

    Also, I’m not sure of the AESA on the FA-50 (if it can be tailored to the bid), but RACR/SABR are certainly better than Zhuk-ME.

    How you know it’s better than Zhuk-ME2M?.

Viewing 15 posts - 451 through 465 (of 4,319 total)