JSR. I am saying that Russia’s economy is in far better shape than Canada’s despite Russia having a business cycle recession. There is nothing good about the Canadian economy.
Canada does not have economy so there is nothing to compare. Canadian have practically lost all skills to built stuff except for assembly line work. They are now closer to hand out distribution economics of Saudi Arabia. Plus Canadian political system is always under pressure from different minority groups like Ukranians and Chinese that led to even further stupid decisions.
things going to heat up.
We will judge by deeds and not by statements in order to figure out if our Israeli counterparts abide by these agreements,” the Russian top diplomat said.
Egypt is now better position to squeeze others due to Russian military cooperation.
http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/business/saudi-aramco-resumes-egypt-oil-deliveries/3609018.html
Saudi Aramco resumes Egypt oil deliveries
Canada is uncompetitive medium skilled economy . it has to wait for thirld world malaysia to build export energy terminal. also practically 100% depended on selling houses to foreigners. Canada is totally out from Arctic. you willl never hear mass layoffs at Sukhoi or UAC while 90% import depended Bombardier shedding skilled workforce every where. the comparision is a joke.
It’s already obvious that you don’t see anything. Neither recession in the previous two years, nor stagnation now. I remember such people as you, right before USSR died – they too didn’t see what’s coming…poor idiots.
USSR has 50% dysfunctional population . It’s obvious you don’t understand modern concept of GDP and difference between input and output. when input is more than output. It’s negative GDP. There are new drivers you simply not in that field.
http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1038876.shtml
The length, height and empty weight of both aircraft is the same.. the wingspan is 5% longer.. So, again, where is the “MiG-35 is 20% larger than the MiG-29”?
No, I have not seen any huge cockpit.. just a normal cockpit, not larger than one of the MiG-29UB.
It’s the volume of the plane. Just AESA alone add one to the weight. You can see the weight increase in JSF compared to F16E. MIG35 has big back and is longer
The MiG-35 is 20% larger than the MiG-29? where do you get that from?
MIG35 MTOW is about 50% greater than MIG29. It produces 50% more range on internal fuel. I am sure you have seen it’s huge cockpit.
Because it was stated by the former VVS chief it will be doing Mach 2.0 tops, because composites on it are not able to handle F-22 like speeds/temperatures (“It will do 1600mph”) and because Flateric has said so many times. Even if T-50 is magically able to match Su-27 speed, that still puts it below F-22. And T-50 with izd.117’s is certainly slower at supercruise than F-22 with its Mach 1.7-1.78 SC. With izd.30, we shall see.
Lastly T-50 just doesnt need to have higher speed than F-22, SC or top speed. It does need to have larger range though, both at sc and subsonic. And we know for a fact it does have larger range than F-22.
In what year mach 2 statement was made?. what is the top speed of 20% larger MIG35 compare to MIG29. It means you don’t know for the fact.
No one, and macroeconomics especially, doesn’t care – what you pay attention to. We’re stagnating and have no drivers, anymore, for economic growth – that’s a fact.
I don’t see any stagnation. Stagnation means when debt creation and resource depletion are faster than GDP. Japan /Korea/India are the example.
I don’t pay attention to economic forecast as they don’t take into account military power.
http://m.gulfnews.com/business/sectors/energy/lukoil-of-russia-plans-middle-east-expansion-1.1987918
I say it like it was different FCS. And again – we don’t have money on another one fullscale program.
In post 2020 period with current procurement Russia will be controlling world airtraffic, waterways and the most efficient pipeline and cargo rail system . I don’t see any problem with financing . Military buildup automatically attract investment.
Sorry but I don’t understand what you have written.
I think that Belgium will not seriously consider Gripen E or Rafale or anything else apart from F-35. I think any RFP will be used simply to try to contain the cost of an F-35 deal. Because Netherlands have chosen F-35, that is what Belgium will choose as well. IMO the deal is LM’s to lose if they try to squeeze too much from Belgium.
the upcoming economic pressures that are coming EU way it be willl be very hard justify imported systems.
Google translated from https://www.svd.se/belgien-spanar-pa-gripen–vill-ha-offert-pa-storaffar/om/naringsliv
Belgium no doubt will go for F-35; the real reason why they are asking Sweden to send an offer is of probably because they want to create some competition for the F-35; Gripen can compete with the F-35 on cost, however the others (in particular Typhoon and Rafale) cannot do so anymore.
Belgium has a close collaboration with the Netherlands on fighter aircraft I believe, so F-35 is no doubt the most likely selection.
buying rafale will be price of France in EU as airbus and business jets sales goes down French willl have to rely on military exports.
Why not mach 5..? Its just sounds so much stronker.
that willl spaced based orbital weopons. hypersonic weopons and aircraft are Russia core competency and they going to develop further. i dont see any economic problem in post 2020.
PAK-FA will supercruise over Mach 2 just like MiG-31 and can carry large long range missiles like izd 810 so it can take the MiG-31 role. PAK-DP can just use variant of PAK-FA T-50.
its MIG31 replacement 6G fighter .so it is highly mach 4 class.
Russia military is now present in all kurdish areas this despite Turkey threats. both Arabs and West no longer trust Turkey as it has made loud claims .
my forecast is Israel will be cut down to its size just like turkey. Its only escape route is China and Russia can block routes to China.