dark light

JSR

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 4,319 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • JSR
    Participant

    Those Brahmos specifications are 25 years old and the only thing claimed was 9 times energy of Tomyhawk on target. I am sure ALCM version will provide even more speed since much newer.

    https://www.army-technology.com/unca…order-4971274/

    It offers nine times as much kinetic energy and flight ranges up to three times longer than existing subsonic cruise missiles.

    Yakhon was already at 500kg warhead with range more than 500km.

    https://www.rbth.com/science_and_tec…ves_28781.html
    The Russian Yakhont and the Indian BrahMos have a similar appearance to the Onyx, but with significantly reduced combat characteristics.

    The Onyx devices are capable of being fired from underwater, and they fly at a speed of 2,460 feet per second, carrying a devastating, high-explosive warhead weighing half a ton. The missiles have a range of more than 372.8 miles

    when has F-35 6 1000km missile operationally carried.?. lower altitude does not help nor slow moving profile change.

    JSR
    Participant

    Nowadays when even fighter can launch missiles from 1000 km away, these requirements become rather questionable.

    relatively small payload, slow speed and predictiable flight profile of 1000km missiles make them easy intercept or spooked and cant used against real time targets.
    only Brahmos has high speed S curve high speed dive feature so India implementing it on Su-30.

    in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2121881
    JSR
    Participant

    it does not apply in reverse. Turkey has fundamental conflict with Arab world, Greece, Israel and want to squeeze money out of Europe as they not want to let it in completely. so Turkey need another country that can continuously supply high technology and efficient resources. .. what will happen Turkey buy much more weopons after seeing S400 effectiveness. ?

    Turkey sold UAVs to Ukraine and it will implement that trade deal that will only benefit it. this dependency will increase.

    [quote]
    https://www.kyivpost.com/business/ukraine-and-uk-to-start-talks-about-new-trade-agreement.html
    [FONT=”&amp]“The Ukrainian delegation has a fundamental position that a free trade agreement must comply with its name, thus a deep liberalization of access to the markets,” says Pidlasa – “Turkey is currently not ready.”[/quote][/FONT]

    in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2121889
    JSR
    Participant

    if Turkey operate both F-35 and S-400, they could look at how the threat library of F-35 operate and thus make their own S-400 more potent, which is not necessarily what the US want

    what about Chinese supercomputers and industrial robots. are they not improving S400?. or even the whole Israel flying around Syria in small airspace. this is real life practice to airdefence systems of interception and flight profiles of the smallest bomb.

    http://tass.com/defense/1004464

    “One of the key tasks is to improve anti-precision warfare means. It is necessary to develop and build up technological groundwork in the area of air defense, to continue modernization of Pantsir systems

    VHF and OTH radar are not recent development btw, even the old Sa-75 and Sa-125 already had low frequency radar and multiple radars operate at multiple frequency

    old manufacture.

    in reply to: 2018 F-35 News and Discussion #2122655
    JSR
    Participant

    I think it is far from done. Germany will likely order a few more. Production should last till at least the late 2020s.

    Typhoon is already expensive further low rate production will make it even more expensive. the 6G Euro fighter expenses haven’t even started.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2122908
    JSR
    Participant

    It is not just developing product but creating firms like Aeroflot-Volga-Dnepr and UTair to support it. and transport helicopter share engine and components with attack helicopter.

    https://heli.utair.ru/en/informatsiya/novosti/utair-is-authorized-for-commercial-operation-of-mi-171a2/

    UTair is Authorized for Commercial Operation of Mi-171A2

    “Mi-171A2 is a fundamentally new helicopter. We saw value in the innovations implemented in it: digital complex of aircraft equipment, new more powerful engines, efficient lifting system with composite blades and X-type tail rotor. These and other technical solutions have not only influenced performance of the aircraft in the best possible way, but also reduced the load on the crew”, – stressed Dmitriy Streltsov, Vice-President – Flight Director of UTair – Helicopter Services.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2122986
    JSR
    Participant

    The cost and technical advantage of Russia aviation industry so huge that small differences in product operational efficiency not matter.

    you can add C929 and further modification of Superjets.
    Introduced EASA pilot so early in programme.

    [quote]

    http://aerocomposit.ru/ispytateli-easa-vypolnili-polety-br-na-samolete-…

    EASA testers have completed flights

    on aircraft Ms-21-300 [/quote]

    IL-96M will cost $120m even with low production rate.

    http://tass.com/economy/1036287

    [LEFT][COLOR=#000000][FONT=”Helvetica”][SIZE=16px]Prototype of Russia’s new wide-body airliner to cost over $150 mln

    [/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR][/LEFT]

    JSR
    Participant

    . remember your opinion about Chinese technology based on Chinese relative. I mentioned those helicopters . the are not sufficiently protected for armed forces nor they reliable for Ukranian budget. Ukraine situation is very similar like Japan.

    https://www.kyivpost.com/business/ryanair-seeks-hire-ukrainians-pilots-…
    Ryanair seeks to hire more Ukrainians: pilots, stewards and 250 IT specialists

    JSR
    Participant

    I don’t know the details of this deal but the Ukraine needs Helicopters and it certainly thumbs a nose at Russia so I would put this down as for the Geopolitical benefits and certainly there is no harm in keeping the factory busy.

    [/quote]
    we don’t know Ukraine need those helicopters. but one thing is clear. once Ukranain pilots and maintainance are trained on it. they will likely want to get there jobs in other countries where salaries much higher and new crew will need training constantly. its already showing up in deindustrialization on top of debt to buy foreign helicopters.

    https://en.interfax.com.ua/news/general/522232.html

    Motor Sich sees 61% fall in consolidated net profit in H1 2018

    [LEFT][COLOR=#000000][FONT=Georgia][SIZE=16px]According to a company report, its consolidated net revenue in H1 2018 fell by 14.78%, to UAH 5.811 billion.

    [/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR][/LEFT]

    in reply to: Su-57 News and Discussion -version_we_lost_count!- #2123221
    JSR
    Participant

    I full expect Mach 10 to Mach 20 missile inside the weopon bay of Su-57. Look at the new Buk-M3 missile capability. It can intercept missiles with speed of 3 km/sec and altitude upto 40km. now this is tremendous acceleration from missiles that may weigh 500 to 600kg or less. for some reason Russian don’t advertise airlunched weopons the same way as SAMs.
    they do have $3.6b of revenues that is pure weopons unlike when you sell SAM that include TELs, radars and communication equipment.

    http://ktrv.ru/news/Korporatsiya_-Takticheskoe_raketnoe_vooruzhenie-_podnyalas_na_12_pozitsiy_v_reytinge_krupneyshikh_mi.html

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2123399
    JSR
    Participant

    its big T-tail design.. you cannot compare it with passenger design turbo props.

    https://www.janes.com/article/83180/new-tactical-airlifter-nears-first-flight-aad18d2

    As part of the reborn Il-112V project, Klimov was invited to provide an improved engine, the 2,800shp (with higher emergency rating) TV7-117S series 2, while radio-electronics house KRET was charged with adapting its President-S helicopter defensive suite to the Il-112V for battlefield operations.

    JSR
    Participant

    I wouldn’t be surprised that even Rafale added to this bazaar. . After all French practically stop upgrading M2K to get not fully functional Rafale.

    now they are going to built 6G fighter with a country that that has rejected digital tax, euro budget and dithering on basic funding.

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/12/02/angela-merkels-apparent-successor-questions-nato-spending-targets/

    Angela Merkel’s apparent successor questions Nato spending targets

    JSR
    Participant

    [FONT=”Open sans”,Georgia,Times,”Times New Roman”,serif]based on these numbers from the above link .there is nothing they can do about it consider the limited space/skills with inefficient spending. you cannot spend 10 years and nothing to show for unless those people are involved in other aerospace projects.

    This includes $194.6 million for research into fighter “mission system integration studies and manned-unmanned aircraft teaming technology,” and is on top of the $1.7 billion Japan has invested in fighter research since 2009. That first figure is also more than 10 times the amount spent on R&D for Japan’s Mitsubishi F-2 fighter, according to Uchimura

    [/FONT]

    Its all about consumer.

    https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Business-Trends/Major-Japanese-companies-set-for-R-D-spending-binge

    Aerospace development as complex as Steath fighter all the associated weopon systems. need huge area for development and another huge area for testing. Japan simply don’t have the land for this thing.

    Santa Susana: A Compr

    http://articles.latimes.com/1995-01-24/business/fi-23784_1_skunk-works

    Cleaning Up a Bad Mess : Lockheed and Burbank Grapple With Costly Cleanup at Skunk Works

    ehensive Cleanup

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2123615
    JSR
    Participant
    in reply to: ASELSAN CAFRAD #1783251
    JSR
    Participant

    hundreds of kms of altitudes mostly applies to ICBM. why will ICBMs fly near equator where most of the time ships are parked. new generation of smaller air launched BMs, ASM, ARMs are as fast as hypersonic projectiles that can fly high and fly low at sea surface in same flight and far manevorable for over size heavy SAMs.
    The problem for ship based air defence system is that Radar and TEL are combined into one big structure.
    you make one component bigger several other components are also need to be enlarged all the way to resupply ships and manpower.
    now this manpower constraint may not apply to China.

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 4,319 total)