dark light

JSR

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 871 through 885 (of 4,319 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2202124
    JSR
    Participant

    Why would cutting 8% of the planned production number lead to a death spiral? It is also the one that has progressed the least — the other two have progressed much further and are closer to finalization. Also there are no international partners.

    8℅ reduction means there extra space for F18. Boeing need production rate of less than 50 while F35 need production rate of 150 and that 150 extensively depend on foreign orders. Trump will also found out that EU will not stand with him against China or Middleast . He has little incentive to make US weopons cheaper for EU or use EU based parts in them.

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2202126
    JSR
    Participant

    What short of anti ship missiles that Su-34 can carry 8 of them at the same time while still got a 3000 litter fuel tank in centerline?
    And how the heck can Su-34 with that sort of load out get close to an aircraft carrier without getting completely destroyed?

    Those missiles are built with advanced technology even 16 are not ruled out.

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2202303
    JSR
    Participant

    I don’t think the threat has gone away entirely. Russia still maintains a sizable force of bombers including those same cruise missile armed Tu-22Ms which were such a threat back in the day. The F-14D at least was clearly better suited for interception over the F/A-18E or F/A-18F. Yet that final variant was only built in small numbers.

    .

    Actually you don’t need tu22m for saturated attack. Su-34 can theoretically carry 3000L fuel tank on center line and 8 antiship missiles. This make carrier completely ineffective. The only advantage of tu22m upgrades is if missiles are internally carried and launched at Mach 2 dash from aircraft.

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2202367
    JSR
    Participant

    He did indeed mention F18 and F35 in the same sentence but beyond a platitude about getting a great deal he didn’t say anything else.

    He has little room to manoeuvre on this, cancelling F-35 would be highly disruptive at this point and the USN is not massively interested in more Super Hornet. He could force the USN to get more as well as the USMC to adopt the Super Hornet but there will be resistance to that.

    Lockheed Martin has spread production of the F-35 across the US ensuring it has a strong defensive base amongst Republican and Democrat politicians.

    50℅ of F35 made outside US on way or other. That’s redflag right there for him. Boeing can show him more employment with F18 programme. Plus F35 not extensively deployed on carriers that make it depended on allies far more for war on terror operation. Trump foremost priority is putting more burden on allies . I don’t think he need to worry about Congress once he in power. he will put his own people.

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2202466
    JSR
    Participant

    There is a zero percent chance this will happen.

    Trump again mentioned F18 and F35 in same sentence. There will be a lot of pressure on F35 programme to cut down costs or make it more expensive for exports. That is assuming Trump does not discover F35 compromised by Chinese or F35 programme funding his opponenets in congress or just plain recession like F22. there is a lot of headwinds for F35.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2202469
    JSR
    Participant

    Admiral Kuzentov in Libya. there was video conference. it mean high speed internet is onboard.

    http://news.trust.org/item/20170111155003-rigad
    East Libya strongman visits Russian aircraft carrier in Mediterranean – RIA

    it was also visited by Syrian. MIG29K showing.

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C1g7rrJXEAEtY_u.jpg

    in reply to: Which attack helicopter for Iraq? #2202771
    JSR
    Participant

    Irak need large AWACS that look deep inside other countries and has full real time ground survellence capabilities. AWACS will save money in protecting ground radars from insurgents. And also advanced long range MLRS system with saturated bomblets.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2203124
    JSR
    Participant

    I come here to try and get away from economics. I won’t reply to him again.

    But I will just say that, the critics of Russian aircraft or operations always dredge up the Russian economy.

    The bring economy because they are non technical people. they haven’t travelled otherwise why will they compare desert like California with Russia.
    California is comparable with Saudi Arabia in characteristics.
    California produce nothing without external resource. 80% of skilled people will be foreign born due to its bad education and they are not even involved in high tech manufacturing.

    now Alcoa aerospace joined them.

    http://www.rusaviainsider.com/russian-metallurgic-giants-announce-joint-venture/
    Alcoa and VSMPO-AVISMA launch aerospace joint venture

    Russia is going with full service semi conductors manufacturing not relying on Asian fabs. current 65NM is sufficient for aviation electronics.

    http://rateli.ru/news/item/f00/s01/n0000125/pic/000000.jpg

    http://rateli.ru/news/item/f00/s01/n0000140/
    To produce chips on 45-nm technology is still possible to walk through deep modernization of existing production facilities, but for the 28 nm is necessary to create a fundamentally new production. It is a matter of national security “- quoted by” Kommersant “a source close to the Ministry of Industry. According to the plan in the Russian Industry and Trade from 2017 to 2020 should see its own chips of 28 nm, 16 nm, 10 nm, the newspaper writes.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2203160
    JSR
    Participant

    Yes, Russia has put a lot of resources into its military. Of that there is no question.

    That Russia’s economy is based on the export of oil and gas is an objective fact.

    …and yes, I get that it is a source of great pride for Russians that they still launch people into space. (should I make a list of the technologies in which Russia is not self sufficient? :rolleyes: )

    what are those technologies? . there is not a single important thing in this world where Russian money/resource/technology not involved.
    basically 50% of world automobile transport emission control depend on Russia.

    http://www.mining.com/norilsk-nickel-buys-soviet-era-copper-concentrate-1-1-billion/
    Norilsk is a top 10 mining company with its ADRs trading in New York affording the company a $25 billion market value. The company produces roughly a fifth of the world’s nickel, mainly used in steelmaking, and half the world’s palladium used in autocatalysts to reduce emissions.

    All Boeing commercial planes of past 25 years have Russian design input and 45% of advanced titanium used in Boeing products is from Russia.

    http://boeing.mediaroom.com/2013-05-31-Boeing-Commercial-Airplanes-Engineering-Realigns-for-Future-Growth-and-Competitiveness
    The company, which marks its 100-year anniversary in 2016, will establish engineering design centers in Washington state, South Carolina and Southern California. The centers will operate independently but cooperatively with one another and with the existing Commercial Airplanes engineering design center in Moscow, Russia.

    Russia is the real advanced economy that doesnot involve itself in sales/marketing/after sales support with direct consumers but only supply intermediary industrials. because a lot of non engineering services can make a lot of money than engineers and create dysfunctional over expensive cost of living for engineers.

    in reply to: India MRCA Part Deux thread. Who will win? #2203172
    JSR
    Participant

    Do India still want to buy Western systems?. As this alliance have everything from B737mesma to E3 upgrades to Israeli systems to Rafale / Eurofighters/F15SA. I doubt Israel economics can go against Saudi petro dollars system.

    http://www.dw.com/en/pakistans-ex-army-chief-general-raheel-sharif-to-lead-saudi-military-alliance/a-37056688
    Pakistan’s ex-army chief General Raheel Sharif to lead Saudi military alliance

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2203324
    JSR
    Participant

    Hopsalot, countries are not stores, simply as that:
    they have this thing called internal market that made the difference.
    So you would find that USA are one of the greatest producer of both oil and gas than manufactured goods, just their internal comsumption of such products is so high that they have to resort into importation of both.

    USA consumes Oil/Gas because it hasn’t been investing Nuclear/hydro on scale needed. Plus it need all this transport as there is little concept of trains with population density on coasts. Plus all the dollar printing based wealth end up in Middleast and China. where Russia has to develop new methods to squeeze money out of these people.

    http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/markets/2016/03/19/largest-us-refinery-now-belongs-saudi-arabia/81974062/
    Largest U.S. refinery now belongs to Saudi Arabia

    that’s why I give hint. That Russia is the only superpower that can discipline Middleast with military force.

    On the other side nations like Norway having a comparative lesser oil production is still a great exporter of it because its own internal market doesn’t need more than a little fraction of it.

    Norway is not example of advanced nation. infact Norway is always in saving mode. always live in fear of running out of oil/gas reserves. small fleet of F-16 fighters. trying to go into electric car. putting its money in foreign markets with a lot of them in low yield safe bonds.
    Russia invests in big fighters, big bombers, big transport, big AWACS, big airfuellers, big UAVs, multiple space ports, with training spans across thousands of kms and bases well spread around all the way to Arctic. because it has confidence on its labor force and foreign Oil/Gas investors will likely to be in Russia than anyplace else in the world. as only Russia give that reserves, technologies and building pipeline system to the markets.
    On top of that Russia invests huge in intelligence on all levels. that give it insights to new business in West and highly accurate decisions.

    https://techcrunch.com/2009/05/26/facebook-takes-that-200-million-investment-from-the-russians-at-a-10-billion-valuation/
    Facebook Takes That $200 Million Investment From The Russians At A $10 Billion Valuation

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2203405
    JSR
    Participant

    The point isn’t that it is somehow bad that Russia has lots of oil. The issue is that it doesn’t really have much of anything else.

    yup they don’t have much else beside Oil. That’s why they already knew that fracking in coming to US so they built pipelines for US fracking industry and they already knew that once Americans see low oil prices they will be buying SUVs that’s why they invested in steel plants in US.
    The sign of advanced country is that already know and understand every thing about every one else ahead of time.

    http://www.forbes.com/sites/joannmuller/2012/06/06/betting-on-america/#5b7b313a4697
    Russia’s Steel King Is Betting Billions on Detroit
    His company has invested a total of $3 billion in North America over the past few years, including a new steel plant in Mississippi.

    http://www.oilandgas360.com/russian-pipeline-business-swings-away-from-the-u-s-toward-opportunity-in-iran/
    The company believes about 20% of global oil brought to the surface at one point or another flows through a TMK tube, reports The Wall Street Journal.
    Following the shale boom in the United States, TMK began to expand its presence in North America, starting 12 production plants and employing 2,700 people.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2203448
    JSR
    Participant

    Why look up some data if you two can bicker, instead?

    Russia produce third largest number of software developers behind China and India and highest in skill set. your statistics is not capturing the labor productivity .
    Plus the capital budgets of Gazprom and few other energy companies easily exceed $150b a year. construction alone will be worth $1Triliion per year. when world cup standard 11 cities are added for hotels and transports. . I don’t think even China can manage pollution in 11 cities at same time for conducting world cup.

    This is sign of highly efficient low unemployment country

    http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/russian-theme-park-battle-intensifies-as-dreamworks-signs-local-partner-955621
    Three seperate film-themed parks — from DreamWorks, NBC Universal and Viacom/Sony — are set to open in Russia by 2018

    http://www.worldpropertyjournal.com/real-estate-news/russia/moscow-real-estate-news/european-shopping-centre-development-report-2015-cushman-wakefield-russia-retail-market-report-maxim-karbasnikoff-justin-taylor-moscow-retail-market-data-2015-9024.php
    Russia Overtakes France as Europe’s Largest Shopping Mall Market

    biggest reason for Erdogan apology was Turkish constructin firms ban. Turkey never had chance to get annual contracts on this scale from any other country.

    https://www.emis.com/blog/russia-will-not-sign-new-deals-turkish-builders-%E2%80%93-putin
    Some 300 Turkish construction companies are working in Russia under $50bn deals and these contracts will not be affected by the Russian sanctions on Turkey, Bloomberg reported

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2203463
    JSR
    Participant

    Please… the Cold War was between the USSR and the West. Russia is barely a shadow of the power the USSR once was. (and lets not forget the USSR went bankrupt trying to keep up with the West)

    There is no possibility of a new Cold War between the Russia and the West.

    USSR went bankrupt? Did USSR borrowed money from Chinese or sale real estate to them.
    Cold war was between few elites in Communist party of USSR and West.
    USSR was never designed for cold war. The emphasis on cold not hot. Russia is designed for both cold and hot.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2203504
    JSR
    Participant

    latin America is not an effective place to use resources. yy own estimation is that within 2 years Russia will get diversified transport access infrastructure independent of EU and add that procurement of new systems. than EU will start thinking about disarming itself.

    countering space systems.

    http://rbth.com/defence/2016/12/28/russian-armed-forces-14-stronger-in-2016-defense-minister-shoigu_670263
    According to First Deputy Commander of the Russian Aerospace Forces Lieutenant General Pavel Kurachenko, by 2018 the aerospace forces intend “to create a closed radar field for the ground Missile Attack Warning System and begin deploying elements of the system for countering space systems, which is equipped with weapons based on new physical principles.”

Viewing 15 posts - 871 through 885 (of 4,319 total)