It’s old tactic of luring your enemy forward into open spaces, creating escape routes and false deals to deceive.

more Russian weopons on the way.
http://sputniknews.com/military/20160701/1042299995/russia-weapons-iraq-mosul.html

No it isn’t
why are you always trying to spread retarded blatant lie? what the point ?

my statement is always accurate unlike yours. Flanker can take 3000L tank or Brahmos size missile on center line. This gives tremendous flexibility in mission planning and strikes.

http://www.boeing.com/defense/f-15-strike-eagle/#/technical-specifications

You still need total engine power advantage regardless of TWR for radar and electronic warfare. F15 simply not compete with Su-35 and MIG31BM2.

The light weight F-15E is 1980s airframe that lack IRST and modern Radar and will be severally G limited. new F-15K is 20tons without Aesa radar.

Tariffs will of course not affect Germany because there will be a de facto Boycott of German goods in the UK as a result and I suspect other anti-EU groups across the EU will follow-suit on an unofficial basis. Angela is real popular lately in case you haven’t noticed. Losses of jobs in addition to refugee crisis and allocation will be difficult to sell to EU nations.

Subsidise these terrorists and criminals while you lose your jobs and money.

Yours Sincerely

Angela

:eagerness:

This Angela is complete joke. when she ever stood for any other EU country beside her narrow political party.
hundreds of thousands of EU expatraites are already losing jobs across the Middleast and Asia. and this will continue as political orientation and business interests changes.

http://sputniknews.com/middleeast/20160627/1042041185/french-workers-stuck-saudi-arabia.html
Hundreds of French Workers Trapped in Saudi Arabia, Paris Remains Silent

UK can win trade war against Germany but problem is that UK currency will go down and budget deficit will explode due to slower economic growth. than you will not will be able to afford imported weopons from US/EU and ultimately Britain withdrawl from war on terror and Nato obligations. the rest I will leave to your imagination.

I’m not really against him per se, just dismissed the conjecture brought up earlier in this thread so nobody reading it thinks the nonsense has any basis. I’ve laid down easy arguments to research the basis whereas some of the other posts were pure fantasy. The basis of the OP was nonsensical, saying that the west had no Flanker sized fighters, which clearly wasn’t the case.

So where is that Flanker size or capability fighter. how big is the tail and back. show me any western fighter lifting so much on wingtips for long flights. airframe strength.

where you get this idea of cold war missiles? . there many layers of airdefence setup there.
show me any American aircraft flying around Latakia/Tartus. Russia only left Kurds alone. every one else is fair game. Just look at Arabic twitter feeds.
its very high sortie generation rate.

http://warontherocks.com/2016/06/russia-is-in-charge-in-syria-how-moscow-took-control-of-the-battlefield-and-negotiating-table/
If the Russians were to continue bombing the way they were bombing at the beginning of the year, the level of destruction for civilians and infrastructure would be unbelievable,” he said.

Its Russian fighter that bombing US supported rebels. Those Russians very clever telling the whole Arab world that US fighters are nearby and they cannot anything with Ruaf operations.