S400 hasn’t demonstrated in practical form in Syria but mere presence of air dominance Flanker enabled Ruaf and Syaf to do the most intense bombardment in modern times without any interference.
Why would Western European Countries sadle themselves with a freaking massive 17+ ton airframe in the eighties when their major concern was the 4000 tatical fighter bombers of the Soviet Frontal Aviation groups that were right at their border?!
Western European Countries are tiny in terms of area by comparison with the like of the URSS and China. With the sole exception of the UK Giuk mission (arguably) there was no mission for such a big beast in the West European Orbat´s in the eighties, they didnt need the range (and the associated cost) of something so big, thats why everyone and their dog bought the Viper or Hornet and not the Eagle, or the Tomcat (or the Mirage 4000).
Long range fighter is to support naval operations and escort bombers. Remember the size of ocean is not limited to the size of coastal length of country. There plenty of examples of abandoned armoured vehicles in Syria and Ukraine as they ran out of fuel.
MIG-31BM need constant reminders in every thread about aircraft specification and specific roles they are designed from ground up otherwise it’s all his misinformation.
I think this discussion has missed a point of the post that it was us the west missing out by not having a flanker sized aircraft.
Now the west (maybe not the best term) is bigger than America. Basically in this discussion it should include European countries including turkey, NATO countries, Canada, Australia, New Zealand etc. People have said the f-15e fits the flanker profile. A few problems with this are it is and always has been really expensive to purchase and operate. This has limited most western airforces to get f-16, f-18. While some countries have developed aircraft like typhoon, rafale, mirage 2000, F-1, tornado and some countries have bought these aircraft most countries do not have large fighters. The price difference between west aircraft and flanker is a topic for discussion in its self. It’s hard to actually get an acurate price for all aircraft and to get operating costs.
All the flanker variants I think points to a good airframe. It is agile carries a good amount of fuel and weapons and I believe a good platform. Now a western equivalent would have to be roughly the same capabilities and the same price. The flanker variants offer a good range of capabilities, rough field performance, good power, agile, loiter time and range. Now a western development would obviously have western engines and systems but these would have to be able to provide the same amount of power and systems deliver the same capabilities. I’m not saying they are top of the range but the goal would be to have 50 aircraft rather than 10 aircraft with half grounded.This is all obviously guess work and a lot of what ifs. Now say Germany, UK and France had 50-100 flanker (ish) aircraft in the 80’s instead of what they got (Germany non bvr phantoms) (UK Tornado F2 then from 88 onwards F3) I think would have made a big difference in what they were able to demonstrate over Europe.
What Flanker provide is all in one solution by design. It is EA-18G and F-15C/F-15E all in one solution with much more. this increase the effectiveness of expediationary operations. Even dumb bombs are fairly accurate.
Just look at Turkey example entire airforce is built around F-16C. they could have chosen F-18E/EA-18G combo that would have been more effective. but still limited to aerodynamic deficiency of super hornet platform.
F-15 radar is extremely powerful though, it probably the fighter with the most powerful radar at the moment along with Su-35S, it can also carry ATP sniper-xr, which is a powerful IRST unit by itself
both Su-35 and MIG-31BM radar has more power as they have more engine power and goes higher altitude.
I’m more worried about undisciplined robots now. Yet you suggest its gone further and now its undisciplined robots preying on the elderly in Japan and Korea. Its horrific….all those movies where Godzilla comes and saves the day. Here’s hoping eh JSR.
…back on the ignore list you go.
robots are programmed for particular tasks and they need maintainance for working long hours. This is the most important statement and shows the depth of Nigel Farage knowledge. Turkey is code word for Germany. Turkey pretty much integrated into Germanic industrial/Tourist/Education system unofficially.
than there is Israel composed of EuroAsian-Turkic tribes from Ottomon/Russian Empire in alliance with Turkey.
NIGEL FARAGE: Why we must vote LEAVE in the EU referendum
WE cannot afford to risk staying in a political organisation that is ready to admit Turkey and planning deeper integration, says the leader of Ukip
your never going to win against them by staying inside EU.
Re 926
“…it should never be a union of equals…”
That is a key statement. After WW2 especially, it could never be a ‘union of equals’. Given the imperial history (attack dogs, attention !) of GB it could never have been a ‘union of equals’.
This was understood in the nascent EU but overlooked in this country. The British were accustomed to running not only their own affairs but also also those of many others and, old habits die hard. I believe that the knowledge of this habit underpins the elemental desire of GB to become once more responsible for their welfare, to take into their own hands, control and responsibility for their future – which despite the anarchic nonsense spouted by some on these forums, is positive and optimistic.
We functioned very well outside the EU for the majority of our existence, we will do so again.
yes imperial history plus this EU construct is anti-British from the start. once you look at the market principal of labor.
read page 90-92 of this book. the book is written in 1953.
http://spitfirelist.com/books/tetens_pt1.pdf
Russia: development (based on Il-96-400 and Mi-26, I guess), some manufacturing, some assembly
China: money, some electronics, a good deal of manufacturing, some assemblyAll in all not a bad move and sadly no other possibility.
China can’t built Mi-38 equal all of sudden it can help in newest Mi-26 version. The ARJ21 they put in service has half the range of wider SSJ-LR. Wider aircraft are draggier. MS21 is presumably wider than c919. Aviation electronics are different. They are too behind in aviation tech. It seems more exchange of technologies in different areas.
http://www.ship-technology.com/news/newsrosneft-and-csic-to-build-floating-transfer-dock-for-zvezda-shipyard-4933719
http://www.railjournal.com/index.php/asia/russian-and-chinese-railways-agree-joint-strategy.html
Didnt you tell us a few days ago though JSR that manpower was unimportant and that robots were the new enabler for the labour force to be downgraded in significance?. Was that a ‘mistake’ perhaps….or is there concern about indisciplined robots now?.
Robots is to increase productivity to make more with less work force so that countries with aging population like Japan/Korea can still make products in sufficient quantities. You did not paid attention to the other part that I mentioned that UK is second largest market after Germany in EU. that itself is advantage for any manufacturer and that’s the reason why they are there at first place. try to comprehend the full sentences that I write.
You told us software….by that I assumed you to mean Intellectual Property….was global and transferrable. Now you are saying that the quality of the labour force actually DOES matter. You seem to be able to reverse your position with the speed of a UKIP leader JSR….shame you are a foreigner you’d fit right in!
did I ever say they quality not matter?. I said other countries are rising in there labor skills. these factories can easily be shifted to produce the same thing. but UK itself a rich market so there is no need for them to move out.software does not just limited to intellectual property but high end software products for industries like in Oil and Gas, cyber security, operating systems, platforms for e-commerce and global payment systems. Is Master Card/Visa british tech?. Chinese and Russians have developed there own card payment system.
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/06/27/nevermind-the-brexit-uk-will-emerge-with-a-good-trade-deal.html
The U.K. is by far Germany’s most profitable export market. Last year, Germany’s trade surplus with the U.K. came in at 51 billion euros ($56 billion), accounting for 34 percent of the German surplus with the EU. That surplus was also 42 percent higher than the German trade surplus with France, Berlin’s largest European trade partner.
With its 89.3 billion euro worth of exports to the U.K. last year, Britain is Germany’s third-largest export market, after the U.S. and France.
Will Germany give this up by shutting the U.K. out of a free-trade agreement with the EU? Of course it won’t.
And here is another interesting story. You probably heard the Germans boasting about their booming China trade. Here is how booming that is: Last year, German exports to the U.K. were 25 percent higher than its sales to China. The big difference being that Germans made a huge surplus with the U.K., but their China trade recorded a 20 billion euro deficit – a fourfold increase from the deficit in 2014.
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/06/27/nevermind-the-brexit-uk-will-emerge-with-a-good-trade-deal.html
Russia’s contribution is definitely engines and its domestic market and traditional foreign partners
for the widebody, China should lead in the airframe design. Russia hasn’t produced any new widebody design in over 3 decades. its all just ilyushin variants that reflect design philosophies from the 70s. the y-20 is a modern design.
for the heavy helicopter transport, russia has some good ideas, but they never get produced.
in both cases, project management should definitely be under China, other wise it’ll never be finished on time.
actual aircraft manufacturing should be done in China where its cheaper, but Russia should be allowed to license produce their share of the aircraft for domestic use.
That IL-96/Tu-204SM are very modern design. Just there engines are from late 80s tech. once reengined with PD14 they are competitive.
Plus Russians have worked with Boeing on large airframe projects for nearly 3 decades. Even the narrow body MS21 has 6500km range in basic form. The Chinese 919 with outdated materials have 5500km range at best. I don’t think Chinese bring anything to the table. There is not even cost advantage as if Production is in Shanghai.
http://www.seattletimes.com/business/russian-engineers-once-turned-back-now-flowing-to-boeing-again/
Russian engineers, once turned back, now flowing to Boeing againSPEEA has long been unhappy about the Moscow center, where some 1,500 mostly contract employees have designed many pieces of Boeing airplanes, including on the 787 Dreamliner, for pay that’s approximately one-third to one-fifth of U.S. rates.
The union is especially rankled by the large batches of temporary Russian engineers it says Boeing has cycled through its Puget Sound-area offices in recent years, typically around 200 at any given time, each staying two to three months.
Exports cheaper but imports more expensive JSR….not being blessed with many raw materials we haven’t already tapped we are quite dependent on imports.
These global firms don’t care about this exchange fluctuation. they buy raw materials at global level in bulk and they have hedges to deal with fluctuations. what they care is the quality of labor force (discipline), infrastructure (transport, Ports, Water resources, no financial controls) and R&D capability of university towns.
Water is the key resource not energy. once they make a product whether its Pharmaceutical or software/semiconductor it give them big leg up at global level to make big profits.
stock market is just multiplying that profits. here the connection to soverign wealth funds of Middleast and Asia come into play to boost up the market.
The problem is not brexit but how to effectively deal with Angela Merkel. Obama tapped her celluar phone and after that she never was able to stand up to him. Obama state department routinely issues terror travel warnings to EU to present EU intelligence services as weak and dependent.
Its is the job of British government to present UK the country with special privileges super imposed on EU. it should never be union of equals.
Well loads of unemployment. As we can see our banks and Airbus may well lead all the Japanese car industries elsewhere.
why will these manufacturers leave when pound values goes down against dollar and Euro. the products from these factories will become more competitive and you can export more to the world. housing prices will go down this will enable lowering of cost of living. UK can damage EU more than EU can damage UK if you play the game right. Economic downturn in EU mean more right and left wing parties gaining ground in EU that will create dissary for Germanic firms. It is better to play Japanese/Korean/Chinese/Taiwanese firms against EU firms.
Don’t try and weasel out of admitting the truth about people like Farage – the majority of votes to leave came from older voters and the permanently disenfranchised who have the mistaken belief that somehow being out of the EU is an alternative to getting off their arses and working. The EU has managed over the period of its existence to stop Europe from descending into that endless cycle of war and destruction that has been the one common feature of its sad history since the end of the Roman Empire. You little Englanders want to go back to a period when the petty rivalries and fascist leanings of the various European governments gave us such wonderful events as the Hundred Years War, the Seven Years War, the bloodshed of the Napoleonic Wars, the Franco-Prussian War, and, to top of all those bloody events, WW1 and WW2. It was the sheer horror of WW2 that led to the push for European economic union. That particularly bloody event was excessive even by the standards of Europe and now we see the same fascist rabble rousing behaviour repeated by the likes of Farage and that upper class twit Boris Johnson.
it seems you have little understanding of history. If there was no Soviet Union and the countries in Central Asia and Eastern EU under its yoke for 100 years than Turks backed by German would have spread Islamism. Armenia case is just one small example. imagine the later discovery of Oil in Middleast under such control.
I really hope you are proud of yourselves because you have managed to set in train the undoing of what years of serious effort to avoid repeats of all those endless wars had achieved. Now we have fascists on the rise in Britain, France, Holland, Germany and other parts of Europe
These people are on the rise because of failed economic and social policies.
while the Russians whose historic aim has always been a disunited and endlessly bickering collection of small countries in Europe are probably rubbing their hands in glee. Your best hope is that the leave vote was so narrow a victory that it will be overturned by your government actually showing some leadership and spine. And you haven’t even considered the long term economic effects for the Britain as suddenly tariff walls appear, the free movement of labor is curtailed and Britain becomes subject to trade and migration barriers that it hasn’t known for years. Anyway the Scots will probably now leave the union as will the Northern Irish and all that will remain is a truly Little England relying on endless royal pageantry to attract enough tourists to support your collapsing economy.
Russia want united EU under Germanic control. It means ownership of firms will be under Germany and rest of EU will provide labor. Germany will be the central point for energy distribution. There will be no more middlemen for gas transit. It will be Germany responsibility to control and discipline all EU countries.
http://www.naturalgaseurope.com/nord-stream-2-moving-ahead-with-procurement-30243
Nord Stream 2 Moving Ahead with Procurement
Okay, what’s that got to do with it?
since UK will not afford military adventures with lowering of pound and higher energy costs. it will be out of EU conflicts. that’s the benefit.