dark light

Chox

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 935 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Some More Aerial Photos From The ETO #1127673
    Chox
    Participant

    Anyone know if it’s possible to get hold of WWII aerial photos of UK airfields?

    in reply to: raf museum #1127675
    Chox
    Participant

    They could take the coffee bar out of Hendon’s display area and stop treating the place as a drop-off centre for bored mothers. Come to think of it, they could stop trying to promote the place as an entertainment/activity centre for kids and then there wouldn’t be quite so many bored children wandering around making a noise and trying to break things. Who knows, maybe they could treat the place as a museum? Just a thought…

    in reply to: Any Chance Of A Shackleton Returning To The Sky? #1127414
    Chox
    Participant

    Is it? Are you sure about that? 😉

    in reply to: What did you do on your 21st birthday #1117822
    Chox
    Participant

    Seem to recall I spent most of the day sat in the sun at the end of St.Mawgan’s runway as I was on holiday at the time. RAE Bedfrod’s red-trimmed Nimrod turned-up to add to the resident OCU/42 Sqn aircraft. In the afternoon 19 Squadron arrived on deployment with twelve Phantoms, a couple of Hercules and three Canberras from 100 Squadron (adding to the resident 7 Sqn aircraft). Canadian Argus came in too. And of course the Concorde sonic boom in the distance at about 9pm. Ahh those were the days!

    in reply to: The Suits worn by the Test Pilots of the TSR2 #1114983
    Chox
    Participant

    If you find any more info on this matter, do keep us poatsed. I’m still working on my TSR2 book for Ian Allan until the end of the month, so any snippets are always useful. See also my separate thread re-photos… still on the scrounge!:D

    in reply to: TSR2 photos #1114882
    Chox
    Participant

    Indeed I do, I have a set of those shots which Warton found for me. But thanks for the offer – most kind!

    in reply to: TSR2 photos #1114153
    Chox
    Participant

    Incidentally, if you dare to mention TSR2 on Pprune, your post will be deleted. Seems they’ve adopted some uniquely new rules on forum moderation – if they don’t happen to like the subject then you can’t talk about it. Brilliant, eh?!

    in reply to: The Suits worn by the Test Pilots of the TSR2 #1112842
    Chox
    Participant

    Rocketeer, components are certainly of interest. A decent picture is always worth a look!

    … and what’s all this about one “hitting a bridge” ? Think that story must have eluded me – do elaborate!

    in reply to: TSR2 photos #1112499
    Chox
    Participant

    Phantex, I take your point but if you have any connections with the aviation publishing industry (books and magazines) you’ll know that most of us “jobbing writers” do the work for peanuts. We certainly don’t get reproduction fee budgets with which to pay for photographs, and in effect we’re left to do everything ourselves at our own expense, being paid just once for the finished product. So generally it’s a lot of work for not very much money. Can’t speak for anyone else but if I was qualified to do some other sort of job, I think I’d be doing it by now, as then I’d probably have a bank balance that wasn’t in deficit!

    Ultimately, most projects like this rely on the goodwill of contributors to a greater or lesser degree. The best that can be done is to credit pictures to the person who took them or supplied them. Sometimes it’s possible to provide a contributor with a free copy of the finished book, but even that doesn’t happen very often as publishers generally only provide six free copies for the author, so they tend to disappear rather quickly. For example, I haven’t even got my own copy of my recently-published Lightning book as I had to give them all away!

    Of course it’s a two-way street and I always help other people whenever I can with information or photographs. I’ve lost count of the number of books and magazines which include photographs I’ve taken, but that’s fine, I’m happy to help when I can. I don’t think I could be accused of being anything less than helpful. I gave an enthusiast my last copy of a book I wrote twenty years ago a few weeks back – for free – because he wanted one.

    Anyway, sorry if it looks like I’m taking advantage but that’s really not how it is. It was a simple request and of course nobody is obliged to help! Thankfully the greater proportion of aviation enthusiasts are generally happy to help if only to ensure that books are as good as they can be – and that’s certainly a good thing.

    Pure Lightning, I’m afraid the Canberra idea seems to have been put on hold for the time being. It’s something I wanted to do (and still do) but the publishers are very reluctant to look at anything much at present (thanks to the financial climate) and Canberra was one of a few ideas which looked good but so far hasn’t got any further than a general agreement that it would be a good idea! But I guess it might go-ahead maybe later in the year when things hopefully improve.

    568 Crew, the photos sound interesting – if you get a chance to do a thumbnail copy or something (?), do let me know. I have a feeling that I might have the in-flight shot but it’s very difficult to be certain without seeing it as there are quite a few similar pictures but often with slight (and interesting) variations. Same applies to the factory shot – I have some, but yours might be a different one!

    in reply to: TSR2 photos #1112244
    Chox
    Participant

    Is Chox being a little disingenuous

    No Kev, I’m not. If you think otherwise then perhaps you should contact some of the publishers and find-out for yourself how much (or how little) money is involved, before making any accusations?! As for the Gay Guide you’re completely wrong on that assumption too! Again, I can only suggest you ask Virgin Publishing if you don’t believe me.

    Anyway, back to thread – heli1 that sounds very interesting! Pictures like that would certainly be worth seeing.

    in reply to: TSR2… What name would it have been given? #1110420
    Chox
    Participant

    HS681 would probably have been called “Aldershot” it appears.

    Names for TSR2 just don’t seem to have any foundation. They all seem to have grown from rumours and home-grown theories. The only vaguely useful detail is the plan to name the F-111K “Merlin” which might suggest that had history been different, the same name might have first been applied to TSR2.

    One other interesting snippet is that “TSR2” was never a proper name for the aircraft at all, and it was simply a phrase used by the Ministry of Supply to refer to the weapons system as a whole… and subsequently became an accepted term. Technically-speaking, the aircraft remained as the “Vickers-Supermarine Type 571” throughout its short life.

    in reply to: TSR2… What name would it have been given? #1109762
    Chox
    Participant

    … or maybe we could start a “Totally Irrelevant and Pointless Comments” thread? :p

    in reply to: Dumped Jaguar? #1109511
    Chox
    Participant

    Oh dear – what were they thinking of when they made that video?! Might have been funny for about thirty seconds but that was more like fifteen minutes… and not many views of the Jaguars either!

    Oh well, if the guy on UKAR is correct (but of course he may well not be), perhaps the Jaguar isn’t “dumped” at all but merely awaiting attention? Just hope it doesn’t become abandoned like so many aircraft do!

    in reply to: Converting a Mk2 Shackleton into a Mk1… #1108406
    Chox
    Participant

    If Strathallan hadn’t allowed their Shack to deteriorate until it was only fit for scrap, we’d still have a first-generation machine to admire. I never understand the point of museums taking aircraft if they’re simply going to let them rot.

    in reply to: Converting a Mk2 Shackleton into a Mk1… #1107705
    Chox
    Participant

    This kind of thing has happened many times before – sometimes a long-term success, sometimes, regretably, not. Some in the latter category where large aircraft have flown to a Museum to be chopped later: Beverley at Hendon, Convair at Duxford, Vulcan B.1 and (more recently) various airliners at Cosford, etc.

    Indeed, and in just about every case, the aircraft could have been saved, but the people responsible chose not to save them. The Beverley was a disgrace – leave it to rot and then claim it’s unsafe… very convenient, and yet had it been a Spitfire, every effort would have been made to save it… Convair was left to rot despite Duxford being full of enthusiasts and volunteers who could presumably have prevented its destruction (and the even more significant MRF Varsity). The Vulcan B1 at Cosford was an absolute disgrace. Money can be found to build museum facilities and fancy displays to entertain children but saving a unique aircraft? Nope, it is left to fall apart. Then they dispose of the airliners for no good reason other than that they presumably didn’t like the look of ’em. What possible harm were they causing where they were? If non-aviation museums acted in this kind of manner there would be an outcry, and yet it seems that in the world of aircraft preservation the museum luminaries can simply pick and choose what they deem to be important or otherwise. It’s ridiculous.

    Okay, rant over! As for the Shackleton, I guess there may have been good reason why it was abandoned but it seems odd that it was simply let to rot – you’d have thought that someone could have tried to keep it in reasonable shape? It was certainly a very sad affair. I did see the nose section somewhere not so long ago – might have been Aeroventure? Think it was over there for a short while?

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 935 total)