dark light

GoldenDragon

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,726 through 1,740 (of 2,918 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Identity and purpose of this please ? #2643871
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    Load testing on the wings. Being set on raised platforms simply allows people to walk underneath the plane and look for signs of stress.

    in reply to: The Chao Phraya in action (Thai navy) #2071615
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    New Thai FFG!

    This is supposed to be a new FFG being built for the Thai navy in Shanghai.

    It looks like the third FT25 “Naresuan” class. 511 seems to be a little off though. The lead ship and the Taksin were numbered 421 and 422 respectively.

    in reply to: China emerges as a maritime power #2071639
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    China could be using vacumn tube technology. How do you know it’s not active but passive?

    We’ll call it a PAR for now 😀

    in reply to: Pictures, news and speculation thread #2644027
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    WZ-10 confirmed by Western company

    Interesting tidbit from the Sept. issue of AFM:

    Lord Corporation, which supplies noise and vibration dampening equipment said its products is used in the Z-10 (as well as the Z-11.)

    This info was given at the Farnborough show.

    AFM went on to say that although there is no official word on the Z10 (ala J10), a second prototype is already in flight test.

    in reply to: China emerges as a maritime power #2071655
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    HHQ-9 is active radar homing, of course.

    Looks like active radar homing for the terminal phase with initial directional guidance from the APAR. Without a need for illuminators, it would allow more simultaneous interceptions (targets being limited by the number processed by the APAR instead of the number of illuminators.)

    A large seekerhead is one advantage you get from such a big SAM missile.

    The disadvantage is you only have 48 missiles.

    in reply to: Pakistan asks to buy 70 F-16 #2646053
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    when we get Thunder and a new high tech fighter I suppose we can dedicate all our F-16s to strike/attack, they are equipped with the Atlis 2/Paveway combo…

    Very doubtful that the F-16 would be dedicated to just strike. This a premier multi-role aircraft (second to only the F/A-18 in its weapons suite.) If PAF is aiming for 70 of them – and that is a large amount – then an AA role is there too.

    The BVR question will be handled in form or another and as stated earlier, the FD-60 BVR was EXPLICITLY targeted for F-16s.

    From Jane’s Defense Weekly – April 14, 2004:

    Chinese missile may be for Pakistan’s F-16s
    ROBERT HEWSON Editor Jane’s Air-Launched Weapons
    Bangkok

    China is about to bring a second beyond-visual-range (BVR) air-to-air missile (AAM) to the export market. The new weapon, to be known as the FD-60, is already in service with the People’s Liberation Army Air Force as the PL-11.

    In China it equips the Shenyang J-8II ‘Finback’ interceptor but,according to the manufacturer, the export version is intended for the F-16 – a clear signal that Pakistan could be the lead customer.

    in reply to: AFM October #2646591
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    I haven’t seem it yet in the States. I want to read about the Saeghe.

    in reply to: China emerges as a maritime power #2072248
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    Though CDF is more authoritative, there are pubs that look for info at CMF.

    Here’s a classic screen capture that where the Naval Institute (who published Naval Proceedings) asked CMF for pictures. Also another funny one that has our good friend Rick Kamer interacting with the natives over “classified” naval information.

    BTW, many CMFers are outrageously nationalistic (“ethnicalistic” since most are english-speaking Overseas Chinese) because it is fun and they aren’t particularly serious about the forum like CDF is.

    CMF is just a fun site where people are somewhat expected to be pro-Chinese and crazy. There are no pretensions of being anything else today (though in the past when the old CDF members were there it was different.)

    in reply to: China emerges as a maritime power #2072259
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    Richard is one but many CDF members who publish regularly on PLA related affairs.

    Yes, photos are mostly from ML, but you are only seeing the surface.

    You guys should publish more! 🙂

    in reply to: China emerges as a maritime power #2072260
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    Why China despite all the development in other areas of naval assests, did not develop a missile like Sunburn/Brahmos.

    You mean supersonic AShMs? China had developed supersonic anti-ship missiles way back in the 1970s. The C-101 Sawhorse family. Not entirely successful, there were land, sea and air launched versions.

    The current known version is the HY-3 offered for export. Specs are max speed Mach 2.5 and over 100 km range.

    in reply to: China emerges as a maritime power #2072284
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    I was not refer to reference. Let’s just say, I have no issues for posting the article “China emerges as a maritime power” here.

    Can’t go into detail but CDF actually serves two communities.

    It’s something that people always assumed, Xinhui 🙂

    You have a caucasian economic official from Hong Kong and a Canadian Army general as well as access to Richard Fisher there. Lots of white guys and westerners 😀

    So we could guess that other community besides the Chinese 😉 The interaction, of course, is what makes your forum the best military one on the web.

    That said, Xinhui, there are lots of photos and info combed from the Chinese language forums (again, your original work, notwithstanding.)

    The diffence is that CDF analyzes and discusses new findings while CMFers tend to post for fun.

    in reply to: Greece vs Turkey #2646642
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    Superior no’s do not always count. Look how many times Israel with it’s small population was outnumbered and outgunned by its Arab enemies. Is Israel still around? You bet.

    Greeks=Israelis, Turks=Arabs?

    Different peoples, different places.

    A Greece-Turkey fight wouldn’t be anything like an Arab-Israeli one. Turkey uses many of the same western weapons and tactics that Israel use as does Greece. A fight between westernized militaries.

    It’ll come down to who is attacking whom and the geography of the locales of contention. So it’ll depend on the scenario.

    in reply to: China emerges as a maritime power #2072299
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    I can tell you that for a fact, writers from janes, goblesecurity, RAND, etc, (including Pinkov) did not get their photos from CMF, they got them from the “other” English based Chinese Defense fourm. :-).

    But of course 🙂

    People go to CDF for confirmation. Your great original work aside, Xinhui, we both know that the majority of pictures are mirrored at both places.

    CMF doesn’t keep an archives or any organization to its stuff like CDF so pictures and postings pass through that place through like alcohol through a frat boy 😀

    And just because you would never print anything a drunken fratboy says at a keg party doesn’t mean that real intelligence doesn’t exist there.

    in reply to: China emerges as a maritime power #2072310
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    CMF is an english forum and therefore mainly overseas Chinese, not mainland Chinese. It is more “ethnic chestbeating” 🙂

    In reality, it has no special access to pictures or articles than AFM or any other english-based forum. All english-language forums depend on the Chinese ones for pictures and intelligence.

    The pictures and stories you see on CMF are the mere tip of a massive iceberg of material that spills over from the Chinese-language world. CMF is nowhere near the definitive Chinese military forum.

    But CMF IS one of the funnest sites on the web. I visit it very often because it really doesn’t take itself all that seriously. It’s simply fun to look at pictures of guns and girls (even more fun to look at girls with guns.)

    But as silly as CMF is, it does pull in and translate large amounts of pictures and stories from the Chinese forums that we could see Jane’s attempting write about.

    in reply to: IDEAS 2004 Thread #2648237
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    70 ancient F-16s which US wont let them upgrade to MLU nor will they give them AIM-120. What’s the point of having AIM-9 armed F-16s which would be never able to even survive Mig-21-93s in any sort of fight. It’s just better to invest in FC-1 or something like J-10.

    CPMIEC is eyeing EXACTLY those F-16s as a market with the FD-60 😉

Viewing 15 posts - 1,726 through 1,740 (of 2,918 total)