dark light

GoldenDragon

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,296 through 2,310 (of 2,918 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: FC-1 thread – (Prototype 03 onward) #2684202
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    The “shelf” where the tailplanes and ventral fins are attached is similar to the one on the J-10. I notice this while currently modeling the FC-1.

    http://img61.photobucket.com/albums/v185/GoldenChineseDragon/FC1/model_cage_r.jpg

    Extending from the side of the intakes (small LeRXes on either side), the shelf forms a large lift area aside from the wings themselves.

    in reply to: FC-1 thread – (Prototype 03 onward) #2684204
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    From the Chinese language forums, prototype 01’s canopy and wing root:

    http://img61.photobucket.com/albums/v185/GoldenChineseDragon/FC1/FC-1_01_canopy_r.jpg
    http://img61.photobucket.com/albums/v185/GoldenChineseDragon/FC1/FC-1_01_wing_root_r.jpg

    in reply to: An end to third world air forces? #2684278
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    MiG-27 I do believe..

    I believe you are right.

    in reply to: An end to third world air forces? #2684287
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    I agree GD, but an air arm does offer flexibility in wartime, even against your own people. You can get to places and attack them quickly, often attack without fear of rebel counter-attack (unless they are well armed rebels). And hit places that are generally inaccessable, or inpenetrable to ground units. I won’t carry on about the benefits of air power, even for the third world, as I am sure you know. And as for cost? Well like I said a lot of these poorer nations spend heaps on their military when they arguably don’t really need to. I don’t think the cost/benefit ratio is something a lot of them consider when fighting these types of wars that often drag on for years, and flare up from time to time.

    Air power offers many advantages but air power that is effective is far more expensive than landbased military units of comparable impact.

    Also, airpower is tied to bases which are awfully vulnerable, especially in a civil war/guerilla warfare environment with no frontlines. A case in point was the attack on the Sri Lankan air force in 2001 which destroyed or damaged 26 planes.

    Pictures of the attack’s aftermath from Janes:

    A K-8
    http://images.janes.com/security/international_security/news/jir/jir010903_1_p.jpg

    A Mig-23
    http://images.janes.com/security/international_security/news/jir/jir010903_2_p.jpg

    in reply to: New Chinese AWACS pic #2684349
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    I guess we have to hurry if we would want to be first!

    Both pictures were taken today by the way.

    Take Arthur along too, he’s been through there before.

    Very nice pictures!

    in reply to: New Chinese AWACS pic #2684357
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    Aaaahhhh 🙂
    I love shopping in Nanjing!

    You and the Scramble crew should take a picture expedition.

    And look, Volkswagen everywhere. You’ll feel at home (sort of) 😀

    in reply to: An end to third world air forces? #2684372
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    All the more reason for them to have the power to supress their people too then. Yet another point adding to the reason why they will still operate an air arm. 🙂

    An air force is the least capable arm in suppressing a population.

    In fact, an air force gives an extremely low cost/benefit ratio in most conflicts involving third world nations.

    Operating an air arm for most nations is simply prestige and peacetime sovereignty enforcement. When war happens the army is king.

    This is different from developed nations, especially Anglo ones which had traditionally used a navy for projection and reach. The strike part of an air force is simply an extension of the philosophy.

    in reply to: An end to third world air forces? #2684850
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    End to third world air forces?

    Considering that China, Vietnam and Pakistan with air forces with strengths in the hundreds and thousands are Third World and will still be 3rd world in per capita income levels for years to come, there will certainly be no end to third world air forces in the forseeable future 😀

    Not only that, two of the above Third World countries are out to supply other third world countries with a fighter, the FC-1, that is affordable to them.

    And an ARH bvr missile to match too 🙂

    The FC-1 could prove to be revolutionary in that you might end up with many 3rd World nations armed with fire-and-forget beyond visual range missiles (either through the FC-1/SD-10 or through the US having to release F-16 and AMRAAMs to third worlders to keep out the FC-1.)

    in reply to: huh!? Whats up with all these Poll threads.. #2685070
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    Because some idiot thought it was “cute” to vote in old $%#ing polls :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Hiding the J-10 (Chinese translation of US report) #2685105
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    You did not see air force cadets with a J-10 model on national television 😀
    http://img61.photobucket.com/albums/v185/GoldenChineseDragon/AFM/CCTV_J-10model_r.jpg

    in reply to: China's first BVR PL-4 (and J-9) #2685112
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    Yes, of course 😀

    in reply to: Fastest fighter #2685657
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    Airframe heating becomes a huge factor at Mach 3, which is why the SR-71 is made entirely out of Titanium and the Foxbat is made entirely out of steel.

    Much of the Foxbat was made out of a special steel called nickel steel which is basically a heavy alloy.

    in reply to: SU-22 Fitter #2688202
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    yep i like the Su-22M3 myself, and propperly maintained and flown its an awesome weapon.

    That has got to be one of the coolest pictures ever posted!

    Not often do you see a jet crossing in front of bystanders at eye level!

    in reply to: Sad loss for Irish Air Corps #2688218
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    condolences to the family

    in reply to: FC-1 thread – (Prototype 03 onward) #2688224
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    I wonder if that cap is not file footage of the 01 in the “thunderbolt” paint scheme.

    Great post on the movie link, Phrozen.

Viewing 15 posts - 2,296 through 2,310 (of 2,918 total)