1. UAVs, including converted J-7 and J-5.
2. Q5Ds
2. J8A
4. J8IIs on a Chinese aviation mag
Nice JH-7A pic!
The F-100 was involved in an infamous friendly fire incident where two Huns napalmed the 7th Cav at Ia Drang, the first major battle between US forces and NVA.
Came very close to wiping out the commanding US officer’s command. Killed and wounded many of CO’s staff.
Two reasons: -It will be too much of an already overwelming power shift, where Egypt would have to get the same platform… and more important: We aren’t interested in seeing yet more tech bled to China.
I think Taiwan bleeds as much to China as Israel. But Israel’s action is more irritating for since Taiwan actually pays for its weapons while the Israelies were passing along top rate stuff that the US taxpayers footed for.
Quick! Who would win if the Arabs had American support (and money) and the Israelies had Russian support (and monkey versions)?
The J-6 in action! 😀
The J-6 probably had the best kill ratio against Western planes among MiG variants.
This includes F-4s, A-6s, F-105s and at least one F-104 killed by the PLAAF and PLANAF during the Vietnam War. Rarely publicized during the war years because US administrations didn’t want to expand hostility, these were USAAF/USN aircraft that crossed over into Chinese territory. Navy aircraft on Yankee station were particularly vulnerable because they often flew near Hainan island which was patrolled by several very aggressive units of the PLA Navy’s air arm.
On September 19, 1965, F-104C pilot Major Philip E. Smith of 436th TFS was shot down near Hainan island by the PLANAF. Smith was captured and then released after Nixon went to China in 1972.
They didn’t have it when the F-22 was designed. IIRC they didn’t fly it on the F-16 until well after the F-22’s design was frozen.
Changing the design midpoint, like in the F-22, would have resulted in rebuilding the test sequence of CAD, computer sim, wind-tunnel, flying prototype, etc., all the way to operational induction.
The rapid changes for the FC-1 were almost certainly built into the tolerances of the aircraft design. The Chinese articles on the FC-1 is of a design that is so modularized that almost everything — engine, avionics, even the FCS — is decoupled from each other. Why not if some of the aerodynamic characteristics (as physically represented by different intakes, lift or control surfaces) are also modularized into different packages.
It took the J-8II program some seven years to be developed from the J-8I. The intake and aerodynamic changes were far greater than that between FC-1 03 and 04 but still an indication of the time it would take for radical intake modification.
All indications are that the LERX and DSI were in the plans even at the earliest stages. At least they were explored very early on.
The IDF will get what it wants. It always does. The US will pay for what the IDF wants too.
Seriously, why is Israel complaining about getting 5th gen aircraft that the US taxpayers will foot for anyways?
The L-15 was designed with EXPORT in mind as a followon of the K-8.
Whatever consultation Yak gave, it would have been paid for that alone. Let’s not exaggerate Yak’s role.
L-15 started before Yak was ever brought in and it makes no sense for Hongdu which already exporting the K-8 to build a plane to follow the K-8 which it can’t export.
There are absolutely no stories in the Chinese press on the L-15 to India.
Here comes the large versions of pictures posted earlier on the official flight.
No cutaway as of yet.
Horrible situation under any circumstances. RIP
Posted by SandyJ at CDF:
At the Commission of Science Technology and the Industry for National Defense conference yesterday in Beijing, it was announced that China’s aerospace industry has supplied more than 16,000 combat aircraft, 60,000 engines and 20,000 missiles to the Chinese armed forces.
Awww, so cute! Just to get 04 done on time.
Nice strapless number on the bride.
Originally Posted by Golden Dragon
But without the carriers, the Japanese would never have bombed Pearl Harbor and the Germans would have taken care of the USSR and we would never have had the Cold War or godless commies.Your historical knowledge needs refreshing…the Communists were in charge in Russia in 1917!
Huh?
There would have been no USSR for the Germans to take care if 1917 hadn’t happened.
The premise is no carriers = no Pearl Harbor = no US intervention = no second front = the Germans overunning Moscow = no godless commies = no Cold War.
Which part did you miss?
They are simply buying everything that is available.. Not that the equipment was bad or what. Makes a very interesting inventory consisting of French, US and Chinese fighters, Swedish AWACS and US and Russian helicopters.. You won’t see anything like that elsewhere..
Egypt.
In that vein, the K-8 has become practically a Chinese-Pakistani-Egyptian project.