dark light

Deino

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,651 through 1,665 (of 3,089 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: China may have flown the J-18 "Red Eagle" #2357344
    Deino
    Participant

    :diablo: … at least some better pics of the J-15 !

    in reply to: China may have flown the J-18 "Red Eagle" #2357642
    Deino
    Participant

    China may have flown the J-18 “Red Eagle”

    First of all I thougt this type of “secret project” is better known as “Snowy Owl” !

    However – even if I’m a great enthusiast on Chinese military aviation – I think we should not overestimate it.

    A closer look to all these projects would give us a list of…

    – FC-1/JF-17 – WS-13 integration
    – JF-17 stealthy – development
    – J-10 – preparation for serial production B + WS-10A integration
    – J-11 versions … and here SAC seem to follow the original Sukhoi-way, where each and every new model would be a new type ๐Ÿ™

    – J-11BS/BSH – simple trainer version
    – J-15 – “simple” carrier version
    – J-16 – reportedly “Silent Flanker”
    – J-17 – reportedly carrier capable “Silent Flanker” or this Su-34-like thing ?

    – J-18 – reportedly this “Snowy Owl” stealthy JSF-type
    – J-19 – reportedly a SAC stealthy fighter bomber based on their failed XXJ-submission
    – J-20 – we all know it by know ๐Ÿ˜€
    – J-21 – reportedly single engined JSF-type from CAC

    … and then all the other types like helicopters, Q-6, Y-20 ….

    I think we are all impressed bei their latest archievements and surely we shouldn’t underestimate them … but they also have a limited budget and capability and IMO all these rypes are way too much even for China !

    But anyway that’t the thing that makes that topic so interesting … we surely will see …

    Deino

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 4 #2358556
    Deino
    Participant

    Huuu … can’t see the picture !

    Could You please upรถoad it here ???

    Deino

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 4 #2359572
    Deino
    Participant

    Sorry at the moment I can’t post from here but have You seen the new pictures … esp. the close ups and the one with the side weapon bay open ??

    Deino

    in reply to: PLAAF Thread 15 #2362920
    Deino
    Participant

    FC-1 + PL-12/SD-10 (via Huitong)

    Deino;)

    in reply to: PLAN News, Photos and Speculation #3 #2006592
    Deino
    Participant

    And even more close ups … esp. most interesting, the PAR holes … seems as work has started to install them !?

    http://i53.tinypic.com/29f8941.jpg

    http://i54.tinypic.com/15nosnn.jpg

    http://i55.tinypic.com/2isjolu.jpg

    http://i52.tinypic.com/2ue0mle.jpg

    http://i54.tinypic.com/349evzl.jpg

    http://i55.tinypic.com/2iie711.jpg

    Deino

    in reply to: PLAN News, Photos and Speculation #3 #2006631
    Deino
    Participant

    Reportedly more an AEW-radar ….

    Added below, the latest GE update of the Varyag test bed at Wuhan.

    Deino

    in reply to: PLAN News, Photos and Speculation #3 #2006713
    Deino
    Participant

    ๐Ÿ˜€

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2365020
    Deino
    Participant

    Yupp … really impressive !

    But this one too ๐Ÿ˜€

    Deino

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2365400
    Deino
    Participant

    Hmm … I only see a red X !! ๐Ÿ™

    in reply to: PLAN News, Photos and Speculation #3 #2007245
    Deino
    Participant
    in reply to: Photo request, Spanish desert camo hornets #2367090
    Deino
    Participant
    in reply to: Indian AF squadron emblems #2367096
    Deino
    Participant

    Nice tread !!

    I have to admit, that I really miss the badges on the new-light-grey coloured aircarft. At least the MiG-29KUB with their panther-head is a nice exception.

    Maybe they should reconsider to add them again on the Jaguar, Bison and Mirage 2000 …. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    Deino

    in reply to: Air Action Over Libya (Merged) #2367870
    Deino
    Participant

    No doubt Tom Cooper on ACIG will have it being downed by a mercenary flown Libyan MiG-25? ๐Ÿ˜‰

    TJ

    Why do You think so ??? :confused:

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2008420
    Deino
    Participant

    Sorry, but maybe these are just simply the same “problems” regarding proce, performance parameters and so on on contract India faces with the Ex-Gorshkov, which costs right now what only to rebuild ??? As such India most likely would asked themselfs “Either we receive a tech transfer for that high price, or there is no logic to procced with it” ! :D:diablo:

    Deino

Viewing 15 posts - 1,651 through 1,665 (of 3,089 total)