dark light

Deino

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,846 through 1,860 (of 3,089 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: the MiG-15 and MiG-15UTI in China #2374211
    Deino
    Participant

    @ Pinko !

    Thanks a lot …

    esp. the first answer is interesting, even if this is the first time I’ve heard this explanation. The “version” I knew so far is that this may depend on the linguistic and phonetic similarities between the Chinese number ‘four’ (= sì) and the word for ‘dying’ (= sĭ) … similar in a way to the Western fear of the number ‘13’ !

    The next answer is the most intersting one, if it’s true that China only modified SU-delivered MiG-15 into MiG-15UTI … then there’s also no need for a new designation.

    May I ask for the source of that info ?!

    So long and best regards,
    Deino

    in reply to: the MiG-15 and MiG-15UTI in China #2374281
    Deino
    Participant

    Never heard that the MiG-15 was called J-2 and JJ-2 in the PLAAF.
    It seems that the current designation N° began with J-5 (MiG-17)

    Agreed … but take a look at several – esp. Russian – web-sites, Yefim Gordon’s books on Chinese military aviation 😮 … and not to mention wikipedia ! 😡

    My problem is, that no actual numbers are available and when the MiG-15UTI was really built in China, then most likely a JJ-designation was plausible/possible.

    As such a theory could be that following the canceled JJ-1 from Shenyang, most observers thought the “successor” (which the MiG-15UTI never was) would be most likely the JJ-2 … and as such – esp. with nearly no knowing about anything in China at that time – the fighter itself should be the J-2.

    Just an idea …

    Deino

    in reply to: Hot Dog PLAAF; News and Photos volume 14 #2377266
    Deino
    Participant

    I do’t think it doe carry extra fuel – does it in the F-16D ??? – but more likely “only” relocated avionics from the place of the second seat.

    Deino

    in reply to: Hot Dog PLAAF; News and Photos volume 14 #2377281
    Deino
    Participant

    The clear Taihang engines pic:

    http://www.top81.cn/top81bbs/uploads/2010/07/31/1280556609_11137.jpg

    J10:
    http://www.top81.cn/top81bbs/uploads/2010/07/31/1280556584_62225.jpg

    Really ??? … I hope You saved the pictures before they were deleted !

    Could You please re-post them ?!!!

    Thanks in advance, Deino

    in reply to: Hot Dog PLAAF; News and Photos volume 14 #2386952
    Deino
    Participant

    You can see two wide-angle HUDs.

    More than impressive !

    Esp. in addition to the other ones shown at CDF and since we” have never seen any BS besides the prototype I ask:

    1. WHY haven’t we seen any before ???

    2. or are they really new/built ones or could they be refurbished Su-27UBKs ??

    Regarding the airframes, I tend to say they are real J-11BS and naval BSH.

    Deino

    in reply to: Hot Dog PLAAF; News and Photos volume 14 #2393016
    Deino
    Participant

    excellent work on that Deino, as usual ! 🙂

    but what’s the story on this ?

    😮

    :diablo:

    http://club.mil.news.sina.com.cn/viewthread.php?tid=236928

    in reply to: JH-7A Flying Leopard #2394000
    Deino
    Participant
    in reply to: Hot Dog PLAAF; News and Photos volume 14 #2397528
    Deino
    Participant

    What is there , it says “this clip has been blocked in your region at my end…:confused: Thanks.

    (J-15 maby ? Btw in the latest few pics of allegedly J-15s i still cant discern a hook …hmmm)

    Hmmm … ???

    These are stills from it:

    Deino

    PS:
    Edit: as inserted it redirects You to a different link. Just copy-paste it and cut the two blanks between http:/ /….

    http:/ /v.youku.com/v_show/id_XMTg3OTYzNzU2.html

    and

    http:/ /v.youku.com/v_show/id_XMTg3OTYzMzM2.html

    in reply to: Hot Dog PLAAF; News and Photos volume 14 #2397561
    Deino
    Participant
    in reply to: J-10B ready for PLAAF? #2398823
    Deino
    Participant

    J-10B ready for PLAAF?

    I would say maybe not ready to enter operational service within a front-line unit, but – if they follow the testing of the “old” J-10 – most likely ready for the next evaluation, operational, tactical testing or so.

    Following the J-10-prototypes one test regiment was formed within the FTTC and maybe here’s the same with the new bird.

    Deino

    in reply to: Hot Dog PLAAF; News and Photos volume 14 #2399684
    Deino
    Participant

    excellent work on that Deino, as usual ! 🙂

    but what’s the story on this ?

    😮

    Thanks !

    But that’s IMO clearly a PSed one. If You look closely, You can clearly see the two regular greys … if that bird would be yellow it would most likely be only one yellow.

    Deino

    in reply to: Naval LCA unveiled #2400232
    Deino
    Participant

    Nice little bird … but the undercarriage looks way too heavy !

    Deino

    in reply to: Hot Dog PLAAF; News and Photos volume 14 #2400274
    Deino
    Participant

    Not quite right.

    Lots of PLAAF units do not carry sqd markings.

    I think he meant a ID-number, since currently NO operational PLAAF-unit carries a badge. Sadly this was only a brief period, when the 1. Division had their Tiger badge, the 2. one the one quite similar to the US ACC-badge.

    Deino

    in reply to: Hot Dog PLAAF; News and Photos volume 14 #2400404
    Deino
    Participant

    Since there are no ‘visible’ squadron markings, I am assuming that these are still test units.

    Agreed … most likely the PLAAF will form a test-regiment similar to the regular J-10-testing within the FTTC.

    Deino

    in reply to: Hot Dog PLAAF; News and Photos volume 14 #2400466
    Deino
    Participant

    Hey … these are the first “operational” J-10B ..together with IFR-probe !

    Seems as the next phase of testing has ended !

    Deino

Viewing 15 posts - 1,846 through 1,860 (of 3,089 total)