Maybe the wrong tread but anyway an impressive photo !

Deino
Sorry, but how can that happen ????
It’s official The undercarriage of the naval version (Naval Prototype NP-1) of India’s Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) is bulky by 400-500 kg. The Aeronautical Development Agency (ADA) and Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL), which are jointly developing NP-1, is burning the midnight oil to iron out what they call “nagging developmental issues”.
NP-1 is a trainer with tandem seating and NP-2 will be a singleseat fighter
Insiders associated with the programme attributed the delay in NP-1’s first flight to the undercarriage, built by HAL. “In September 2010, we observed that the undercarriage was over-sized. During traction-retraction and the undercarriage’s incorporation into the fuselage, there were many surprises awaiting us. 😮
This is a very critical piece with the hitting impact on the ship going to be much higher,” an official with HAL’s Aircraft Research and Design Centre (ARDC) said. The official said the issues related to the arrestor hook, landing gear and LEVCONs (control surfaces which allow better low-speed handling) were being addressed completely. With the Naval Project Team (NPT) monitoring every bit of the NP-I closely, the official told Express that all future aircraft in the naval programme would come with a new undercarriage.
In September, NP-1 had successfully completed the engine ground run (EGR) and the taxi trials are set to begin soon “We will fly the NP-I with the same undercarriage making some slight corrections.
If a smaller undercarriage has to be integrated now, it will delay the programme further. Young boys are putting their hearts out and working seven days a week
Making planes are not child’s play,” he added.Sources at ADA say efforts are in full swing to make the NP-1 fly ahead of Navy Day (December 4). Captain Maolankar of National Flight Test Centre is likely to fly the NP-1 on its maiden flight.
During the roll-out of the NP-1 on July 6, 2010, an excited Defence Minister A K Antony had announced that he was confident that the ADA-HAL-Navy team would make it fly by December end (2010). “It will be the best New Year gift to the nation,” Antony had said then. With yet another New Year throttling down for a landing, it is left to be seen whether Team NP-1 can gift Antony an X’mas gift in the form of a first flight.
Bingo … 😀
MBDA is part owned by EADS and when India select Eurofighter and are welcomed as an ‘equal’ partner, they will set about integrating the Meteor (including the development of the compressed launcher), with the FGFA- barring any technical issues with the NO36.
As Quad said, the upper-tier of the IAF will standardise on the Meteor.Happy Diwali everyone!!
Sorry in regard to Your optimism … but is that already “fact” or again only a “wishfull-thinking” if, when and so on, especially since the Indian Flankers will also be modified for their own Astra AAM (which is surely not in the class of the Meteor).
Deino
Just some tidbits:
The MKK airframe is not based on the Su-27M, it is very much based on vanilla Su-27UB (not that there is anything wrong with that). Tailtips aside, the airframes are very similar. Su-27M had some differences, anyways that project was never really finished.
Also, KnAAPO and Sukhoi are very closely aligned, Irkut is if anything a separate competing entity.
Are You sure ??? At least it has the Su-27M’s taller tails with not only the fin-tips but also with the additional fuel tank … and overall the other airframe modifications (- the canards) were included too !?!! :confused:
Exactly what he was saying … and since there were some “reservations” on behalf of the Indian side that a Chinese twin-seater would be build side by side at Irkutsk, this contract was transfereed to KNAAPO, which based theit twin-seater (the MKK) on the stronger airframe of the Su-27M/Su-37.
…
But can we go back to the topic !??? 😡
Deino
while they certainly look like LGBs, the image is kinda small and blurry. Is there a way to be absolutely certain those are guided ammunitions? Is there ANYTHING else in chinese bomb inventory that looks like that?
Plus, can one see a laser designator on the plane? Of course the target could be lased from someplace else, but it’d be nice if j10 selfdesignated it…
edit: oops, didn’t click the thumbnail. Yes, it’s evidently a LGB. Still, it’d prove more versatility if j10 selfdesignated it.
Any guesses as to what size those bombs were? Look like 1000 kg pieces to me.
These are 500kg LT-2

http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-PLA-GBU.html#mozTocId819429
Deino
J-10A dropping two LT-2 LGB’s ..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IaceiXw4eUM&feature=player_embedded
Just a short question … I know that the original quite ambitious F-15J-Kai update project has been cut considerably (no operational IRST, downdraded (?) EW(ECM-suite, …) but is there any open info avaiblable about what was left in that upgrade, how many were converted or planned to be … ??
Thanks in Advance,
Deino
Q:
How many yellow primer J-10s do you see?
A: ThreeQ:
How many of them have the round tips and how many have square tips
A: 2 & 1. 2 on the right, 1 on the left.
I hope You are correct since that would mean production of Block 07 is already far away … but I’m still not convinced (… black radome ??).
CHeers and let’s hope for better photos ASAP,
Deino
Sorry .. even I would like to agree with You, I think this is only some “blurr” around the tip and not the tip alone. Especially since the radome looks still black …. 🙁 (most of all in the yellow one far left in front of the blue door!)
… and I also can’t see the huge UAV ?!!! 🙁
Deino
A nice X-47B video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RCYrpfQ2xCg&feature=youtu.be&hd=1
I really would like to know what You are smoking !!
Besides that … always nice that You only reply to those post You just like to answer … and everything else You ignore !
Deino
Was it succesful ???
Precisely the opposite.
The ones in primer, closest on the tarmac, are Bs.
look at the fins.
Are You sure ?? IMO they are squared ! … maybe I need better glases.
Deino