I live on the development and have a good view of what is going on.
Dismantling, in this case, is a euphemism for demolition. Essentially over the past few weeks they’ve used a JCB digger to pull the building down. As far as I can see they are retaining the metal frame to the building, windows and any ornanmental stonework. I complained to English Heritage and the council but was basically told to lump it. I argued they should be trying to retain more of the fabric, but its all been collated in a big pile and they are carting it off in big skips. And yesterday they “dismantled” the chimney by knocking it down with the JCB. So we’ll end up with a “new” building on the RAF Museum site.
It’s also conceivable that the majority of the bricks are now dust. Preservation? Pah!
Well when I spoke with the English Heritage and LA people they expressed the bricks weren’t high quality.
There hasn’t been any sorting of brick, wood, tile etc. Just all in together.
Besides, the Grahame White Factory is all new brick, cut to original size so not the best precedent.
The Watchtower is no more. If you ever wondered how you “relocate” a listed building please see the attached photos.
The bricks from earlier bits demolished has been through a crusher. There is a big pile of spoil where that part of the building once once.
They have saved the following, as far as I can see:
Salvagable windows
Any oranmental stonework/balustrade
Some bricks – I assume enough for the front facade so it “appears” to be built of “old” looking brick.
The metal frames the building that was directly behind the watch tower
The rest has been reduced to rubble.
Even the “tower” part of the watchtower was pulled down with the digger – one morning last week I got up, looked out the window at breakfast at it, and then by the time I’d left for work it had been pulled down.
I was hoping they were going to save the metal frame of the watchtower as with the other parts but they way the digger pulled it apart and wrenched the steelwork from its foundations it’s probably too damaged to be reinstated.
Perhaps it means you have to be taller than 1.07 metres.
But didn’t the 2 stand for Mach 2, so Tactical Strike and Reconnaissance (Mach) 2 rather than version 2?
I live near RAF Northolt and I’ve heard of one actually civilian landing (accidental) and a near-miss. I found this online, if you read the transcript of the Daily Mail article. Both instances were 707s but not Caledonian.
I have a website I’ve put together with a virtual tour of both RAF Cosford and Hendon that has similar panoramic photos.
http://aviation.elettra.co.uk/rafmuseum/virtual.php
Not aviation related but if anyone is interested in the QE2 or HMS Belfast I have similar virtual tours of them so PM me and I can give you the links.
Great pictures.
I did much the same at Cosford a couple of years back. Of course, you can overdo that kind of thing….:diablo:
There is this at Cosford
http://www.rafmuseum.org.uk/cosford/collections/aircraft/sepecat-jaguar-act-demonstrator.cfm
You can see her on the virtual tour on my website here:
http://aviation.elettra.co.uk/rafmuseum/virtual.php?referrer=cosford&hangarC=2
I did a heritage degree at uni and do a bit of heritage work for an environmental consultancy. Listed buildings are afforded protection for their architectural or historic significcance or cultural/social associations. If a particular building in an outstanding example of its type then it will be listed; if buildings were only listed if 100% of original material remained very few would be listed. Many cathedrals will have had a lot of external stonework, glass, lead roofs replaced so should they be de-listed? (All buildings before a certain date are listed automatically but I’m making a point).
My Exclusive models BAC TSR-2 or is it my Western Models Tupolev Tu-144 with nose down and canards extended…..:confused:
I did hear rumours that Cosford might get one on a forum somewhere, would go nicely with the Comet 1XB. Now the BA Collection has gone there is certainly the space and I definitely recall a post about Cosford getting a Nimrod, VC10 and Hercules (the reason I recall is that Cosford had only recently disposed of a civilian VC10).
Actually if you inspect the ground where these aircraft stood there is some plastic matting or webbing embedded in the ground, which must be there for a reason?
I noticed the prop tips are still yellow, but maybe they haven’t done them yet….
Yes, drop me an IM with your e-mail address.
As regards the gloss – I thought RAF planes were matt paint or low gloss? If you look at the other transport planes like the Argosy or Andover then they are matt, others are very low gloss like the Varsity (I’m giving examples of aircraft at Cosford), but the Britannia is looking quite shiny.
Bristol Britannia G-AOVF’s new identity
Was at Cosford today, apologies for the picture quality but it was a typical grey day in Shropshire so it was quite overcast. But here she is in her new colours as XM497 as predicted in a previous post. Attached are a few photos.
Having a look around her, it is good to see the staff at Cosford are spending some good time on her. Her forward and main gear are starting to look immaculate. There are a lot of underside panels missing, I guess these will be reattached after she is painted.
The paint job looks good (although it is gloss). Shame to see her loose her BOAC colours but on the other hand she is getting some much needed love and attention which can’t be a bad thing.