dark light

SpudmanWP

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 4,849 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2113955
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Thoughts on the two unnamed “new” weapons?

    I am thinking larger Paveways, Brimstone/JCM, JASSM, etc….

    in reply to: What is the safest fighter today ? #2114020
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Somebody fudged a decimal point 😉 :stupid:

    As of Feb 1st, 2019 it was at 177,000 flight hours.

    https://a855196877272cb14560-2a4fa819a63ddcc0c289f9457bc3ebab.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com/13567/lockheed_martin_f-35_fast_facts_-_february_2019_.pdf

    in reply to: Rafale 2018 Thread: Europe's best Eurocanard #2114226
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    What Talios pod give (integrated with new helmet).

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-1Ju4liNmA&feature=youtu.be

    There is no imagery in that helmet.

    in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2114245
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    The F-15 Advanced Eagles are already equipped with those systems

    The only one of those F-15E+ systems that could be better than the current F-35 is the Sniper pod. Then again, the F-35 gets a new one in a couple of years.

    For the rest, you seemed to equate basic functionally in the F-15 with advanced capabilities in the F-35. Take the EODAS for example, while the AAR-57 does provide MAWS functions, it’s missing a whole host of functions that the F-35 has like “see through the plane”, track every WVR target, nigh vision aide, etc. Another is the comparison of ASQ-239 with EPAWSS/DEWS. Teh F-35 has single-ship GEO-location when the Growler does te even have that(maybe soon).

    Don’t even get me started on data fusion.

    Comparing the F-15E+’s avionics to the F-35s is like saying the iron sights on a rifle are just as good as a scope. One may get the job done but the other simply dominates.

    in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2115017
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    If it was “clear” that they needed “new” F-15s then they would have had a proper RFI/RFP process instead of a mandate from OUTSIDE of the USAF.

    Some in the USAF may be saying it now, after they were taken behind the woodshed, but that is not what they were saying 6 months ago. :stupid:

    in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2115344
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    “Why not” because it’s more expensive and you don’t buy a fighter and then come up with a mission, you define the mission and then buy the aircraft.

    The “mission” is to replace CONUS ANG F-15Cs that will never need to haul a hypersonic missile, never carry more than 4 AMRAAMs, never go above mach 1.2 in combat, etc.

    Stop trying to excuse what is so obviously a Corporate Welfare buy that the USAF has repeatedly said that they do not have a mission for and do not want.

    in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2115883
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Despite what members of the Gripen/Rafale fanboi club tell you, EW does not reduce the RCS of the fighter.

    A jammer only works in proportion to its ability to detect and mimic the adversary’s radar signal.

    For instance, the radar of an F-4 should be relatively easy to jam with an 80’s 4th gen jammer but that same jammer would have extreme difficulty even identifying a modern AESA signal let alone the LPI versions found on the F-22/35.

    in reply to: Canadian Fighter Replacement #2115916
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Each FMS deal is relatively unique and unless it’s broken down, you will not get a true picture of the costs. In the above example it is obvious that it includes a lot more than the Super Hornet itself. Some FMS deals include these costs up front and others include them in followup weapons, parts, and support deals.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2115920
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    For the love of God.. check your National Interest articles because they re-post a lot of old news as if it’s current.

    Better yet, stop post National Interest “news”.

    Just so you are aware, “lightning” issues for the F-35 were solved a LONG time ago.

    in reply to: SAAB Gripen and Gripen NG thread #4 #2115975
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    SAAB seem to have a habit of doing what they said they were going to do or better, don’t they?

    Only if you ignore them moving the goalposts :stupid:

    in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2116167
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    They were in the Dec2018 Red Flag..

    in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2116345
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    The best source of units at any Red Flag is here:
    http://www.dreamlandresort.com/info/flag_units.html

    Red Flag 19-1: 01/26/2019 – 02/15/2019
    border: 1 cellpadding: 5 cellspacing: 0
    [TR]
    [TD=”width: 160″]Role[/TD]
    [TD=”width: 140″]Aircraft[/TD]
    [TD=”width: 400″]Tail Number & Callsign[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD]Red Team Air[/TD]
    [TD]F-16C
    L-159E
    A-4N[/TD]
    [TD]64 Aggressor Squadron Nellis AFB NV
    Draken International Nellis AFB NV
    Draken International Nellis AFB NV[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD]Blue Team Air[/TD]
    [TD]F-35A
    F-22A
    F-16CM
    F/A-18E
    FGR4 Typhoon[/TD]
    [TD]388th Fighter Wing 4th FS Hill AFB Utah
    199th FS Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam HI
    20th FW 55th Fighter Squadron Shaw AFB SC
    VFA-136 NAS Lemoore CA
    6 Squadron RAF Lossiemouth UK[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD]Interdiction[/TD]
    [TD]B-52H
    F/A-18A[/TD]
    [TD]69th Bomb Squadron Minot AFB ND
    77 Squadron RAAF Base Williamtown NSW[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD]SEAD[/TD]
    [TD]F-16CM
    EA-18G
    EA-18G[/TD]
    [TD]20th FW 79th Fighter Squadron Shaw AFB SC
    VAQ-131 NAS Whidbey Island WA
    VAQ-132 NAS Whidbey Island WA[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD]Command & Control[/TD]
    [TD]E-3B AWACS
    E-3D AEW
    E-7 Wedgetail
    E-8C JSTARS
    AP-3C Orion
    RC-135
    Sentinel R1[/TD]
    [TD]552d ACW 960th AACS Tinker AFB OK
    8 Squadron RAF Waddinton Lincolnshire UK
    2 Squadron RAAF Base Williamtown NSW
    461st ACW 12th ACCS Robins AFB GA
    10 Squadron RAAF Base Edinburgh SA
    51 Squad RAF Waddinton Lincolnshire UK
    5 Squadron RAF Waddinton Lincolnshire UK[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD]Refueling[/TD]
    [TD]KC-135R
    KC-135R
    KC-135R
    KC3 Voyager[/TD]
    [TD]RFTTF 92d ARW Fairchild AFB WA
    RFTTF 22d ARW McConnell AFB KS
    6th Air Mobility Wing McDill AFB FL
    10 Squadron RAF Brize Norton UK[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD]Airlift[/TD]
    [TD]C-17A[/TD]
    [TD]36 squadron RAAF Base Amberley Australia[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD]Search & Rescue[/TD]
    [TD]HC-130J
    MH-60S[/TD]
    [TD]79th RQS Pope AFB NC
    HSC-23 NAS North Island CA[/TD]
    [/TR]

    in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2116775
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    What I was trying to say is that NGJ pods serve the same function as the ALQ-99s in that they are the transmitters (pointy end) of the jamming system on the Growler.

    You are correct that they are currently not scheduled for F-35 integration.

    in reply to: Finnish fighter replacement revisited #2116779
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    GaNs will come to the F-35 in a Tech Refresh if and when there is shown to be a substantial benefit to doing so and that the cost difference will not bee too great.

    in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2116836
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    They are AESA versions of the existing ALQ-99 pods on the Growler. They are not self-contained and need an onboard system that will manage them.

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 4,849 total)