dark light

SpudmanWP

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,101 through 2,115 (of 4,849 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2213548
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    I have seen references that it may house an IFF transceiver.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2213610
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Time to put on your reading glasses :rolleyes:

    Look at the top photo (the one with two circles) and you will see that the left Levicon is burnt and is shedding it’s own fibers.

    http://i619.photobucket.com/albums/tt271/SpudmanWP/Misc/PakFa_Fire_2127065_Damage_zpsb2bbbf6e.png

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2213617
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    They don’t need to show you or anyone else anything.

    /captainobvious.

    Chill dude… Somebody is a bit touchy 🙂

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2213633
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Look closely at the underside of the two photos. There is extensive damage to the left side of the aircraft.

    Look at these closeups and at the left Levicon. I am not saying they lied about which side the fire started on, just why they didn’t show the left side.

    http://i619.photobucket.com/albums/tt271/SpudmanWP/Misc/PakFa_Fire_2127065_Damage_zpsb2bbbf6e.png

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2213648
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    One guess as to why they don’t show the other side of the plane :dev2:

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (3) #2214611
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    So because he mixed up “days” with “weeks” makes everything he said invalid?

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (3) #2214674
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    He actually said that the RCS of the “35” was smaller than the “22”.

    He said it both ways

    “The F-35 doesn’t have the altitude, doesn’t have the speed [of the F-22], but it can beat the F-22 in stealth.” But stealth — the ability to elude or greatly complicate an enemy’s ability to find and destroy an aircraft using a combination of design, tactics and technology — is not a magic pill, Hostage reminds us.

    He likely mixed up his RCS/Stealth terminology just like the Day/Week terms re:F-117.

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (3) #2214688
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    When he said “Stealth”, he was not talking JUST about RCS

    But stealth — the ability to elude or greatly complicate an enemy’s ability to find and destroy an aircraft using a combination of design, tactics and technology — is not a magic pill, Hostage reminds us.

    I am pretty sure he was adding APG-81 EW into the mix as well.

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (3) #2214725
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    I have nothing against selection of F-35, AFTER a fair competition. Remember F-35 lost competition in Korea before hugely heavy US lobbying reversed the decision…

    In South Korea, the competition was put together by the people who would PAY for it rather than by the people who would USE it.

    Not surprisingly the main driver was COST and it lost on that basis.

    However, the people who actually have to put their lives on the line were able to make a compromise with the people who PAY for it and they both got what they wanted (COST cap and CAPABILITY).

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (3) #2215157
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Dear christ, you are not comparing the “fiscal and political indecision” that surrounds the JSF program with what happened with the Eurofighter program, are you?!

    I was just pointing out to LO that the JSF was also affected by the same issues, albeit at a lesser intensity that the EF program.

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (3) #2215194
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    heavily hit by political and fiscal decisions and indecisions that have not affected JSF.

    Really?

    Last I checked it has had it’s annual buy reduced almost every year and had it’s SDD program extended instead of annual budget increased. This has caused MAJOR concerns with our Partner nations who now have to pay a lot more for LRIP aircraft which has caused them to delay IOC & increase their OP budgets for existing aircraft.

    Then there is the issue of heavy backpedaling re concurrency.

    Come again on the lack of fiscal and political indecision?

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (3) #2215432
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Boeing was over-budget and late with the Super Hornet & 787 and did not do well in the in the X-32 trials which would have required a massive redesign to even meet spec.

    They were given a chance and failed to impress the the point of purchase.

    Complex systems are just that.

    It’s not just the US either, the Rafale and Eurofighter have also taken longer than expected to get to IOC and did not have anything near the F-35 in complexity.

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (3) #2215441
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    All I saw was a politician reading APA releases and trying to get classified info out of the Defense guys into the public record.

    He continually got his “facts”, timelines, programs, features, etc wrong and mixed them up on several occasions. He was apparently upset that the first two F-35s were not coming to Australia but staying in the US as part of the training pool and could not understand why they needed the F-35s for years prior to IOC. Apparently he has never heard of training or similar cooperative programs used for the F-16/15/18 going back 30+ years.

    I think the Defense officials were quite patient with him.

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (3) #2215499
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Huh?

    Sorry, it was another instance of CBC (Commenting Before Coffee).

    I corrected it to say that the USAF and USMC version were originally supposed to have a 1k bomb, not 2k.

    what about JSOW and BRU-61?

    Don’t know on JSOW, Yes on BRU-61.

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (3) #2215647
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Yes that isn’t the biggest difference but big enough they went back to 1000lbs bombs for the F-35B

    Not to nitpick, but it’s 1500lbs.

    Also, the original JSF program only called for the Naval version to carry a 2k bomb while the USAF and USMC versions only wanted a 1k bomb.

Viewing 15 posts - 2,101 through 2,115 (of 4,849 total)