dark light

SpudmanWP

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,191 through 2,205 (of 4,849 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (2) #2247481
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    still genuinely asking about “pulse for pulse”, sry i’m not english born 😉

    It means that the ESM and the radar are connected via fiberoptic cables which allow them to function as a unified machine on a hardware & software level.

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (2) #2247878
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Wondering how ASQ-139 capes are exclusive? Genuinely interested.

    Without knowing the “exact” capabilities of the -239 I cannot say, only speculate based on its heritage.

    However, I think it is the first ESM to work with the radar on a “pulse-for-pulse” basis.

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (2) #2247894
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Capes = Capabilities

    The info that was “hacked” was non-classified info.

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (2) #2249534
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    It does not have 360 as the plane body block the view from below and somewhat to the front and sides.

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (2) #2250391
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Right now the new system on the Rafale is just a more capable MAWS, no new features, IIRC.

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (2) #2250800
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Being only two sensors on the tail means that the plane creates a large blind spot to the front and beneath the fighter.

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (2) #2255752
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    huge blindspots?

    Since the two cameras are located high on the tail, the plane blocks everything below the aircraft, like inbound SAMs and MANPADS.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]225165[/ATTACH]

    And Rafale isnt working on it, it is implemented on tranche 4 operational aircrafts…

    Care to show a link that says that it has any capability above a standard IR MAWS? Just because it shows a picture does not mean anything as I can show you video of the F-22 MAWS yet it does not have any other function beyond MAWS.

    Oh and mica missiles aswell as OSF IT/damocles pod/Reco ng pod data are used and fused….

    Still not as good as EODAS

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (2) #2255894
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    [I]* The F35 will have its DAS operational in 2018, Gripen E will have PAWS-2 at the same time (EF2000 will likely have that, Pak FA will just a few years later also have a similar sensor suite and possibly Rafale as well).

    PAWS-2: It is nowhere near DAS functionality. It only does missile launch and approach functions. No nav, no video, no ground fire, no arty, no BDA, no sync to SAR, no missile guidance, no wingman or other airborne tracking, etc .

    btw, PAWS-2 is already on Israili F-16I fighters.

    Rafale is working on a system that only has 2 cameras on the tail which means HUGE blind-spots beneath the airframe and will likely have less visual acuity.

    Nothing has been told of EF2000 development in this area as they are still stuck with an active radar based MAWS.

    Nothing in known about the new systems on the PakFa other than their locations.

    in reply to: will stealth become irrelevant? #2257178
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    The F-35 at Block 3 would have a field date over today’s China.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2257180
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    First, the scan rates of an IRST vs a radar, especially an AESA or PESA are not at all comparable.

    Second, saying that most shots come from 10-2 is pure supposition on your part.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2257207
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Did the MiG 1.42/44, Su47, Skat and Piotr Ufimtsev never happen?

    Operationally, no they have not happened and their VLO aspects are dubious at best.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2257213
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    I was speaking of the F-22’s use of radar without EVER letting the target know it’s coming. So many of the post-action interviews talk about the target not knowing the F-22’s is even in the area until it zooms past or the controller radios to say you are dead.

    On the IRST issue, it does not work that way. IRST would have to be looking directly towards the launch aircraft at the moment of launch in order to see it. Maybe you are thinking about an IR MAWS, which most aircraft do not have and will become less relevant as newer and longer ranged missiles come online.

    IIRC the larger exercise areas like Red Flag and Norther Edge do simulate the RWR and MAWS functionality of their respective aggressor planes.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2257220
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    I would depend on the actual intelligence gathered in the field.

    Kind of like the stuff that keeps the Raptor wiping the floor with everything that it comes up against in Red Flag/Northern Edge/etc exercises.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2257287
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Sorry sorry? Umm, try to google 101KS-O, or do you really believe that “oh it’s a backward facing IRST” nonsense

    So you are guessing that it is a DIRCM?

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2257291
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    The question remains: would you dare to turn it on?

    That depend on the treat environment, but most likely, yes.

    Funny.. they make world class SAM systems but they can’t put a decent airborne radar together.
    Overconfidence might kill you, bud.

    No, good intelligence will save your hide most of the time.

    The fact remains that while they do have a history of SAM systems, they have ZERO history of LPI/AESA systems just like they have ZERO history of VLO aircraft.

Viewing 15 posts - 2,191 through 2,205 (of 4,849 total)