dark light

SpudmanWP

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,151 through 3,165 (of 4,849 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Military Aviation News-2012 #2361070
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    “The transaction will not include the Hawker Beechcraft Defense Co., which produces the T-6 trainer and is developing the AT-6 light attack aircraft.”

    That’s what I get for not reading the link 😉 Thanks.

    in reply to: Please ID Plane #2361355
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    3rd degree Blackbelt in Google-Fu 🙂

    in reply to: Military Aviation News-2012 #2361389
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    They can forget about the US (or any western power) buying the AT-6 now.

    in reply to: Please ID Plane #2361500
    SpudmanWP
    Participant
    in reply to: Long Shot Artillery Battery Sets Lethal Record #1792207
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    The HiMARS can fire the standard M31 Unitary MRLS rocket which has a 200lb warhead. The bigger ATACMS can have a 500lb warhead.

    btw, Excalibur can hit the backside of a mountain (vertical attack). Check the sequence from the 1:30 –> 2:00 mark in this clip.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ipq8ZAUW-k

    in reply to: F-22 deployment to the gulf being reported #2286805
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    @Golddust:

    You keep changing the goalposts. You start by talking about the F-117 and are now including everything that fly’s. Nice try, but that won’t fly (pun intended). 🙂

    btw, The Buk-M2E system uses X-band 9S36 radar for target tracking and engagement. It is this radar band that the F-22 and F-35 are designed to have the greatest RCS reduction effect on.

    Last thought: Given that the Buk-M2E is a Short/Medium ranged weapon systems designed for F-15 sized targets out to 45km, what range do you think it will pick out a F-22/35 sized target?

    in reply to: F-22 deployment to the gulf being reported #2286868
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    eh I’d like to see F-117 fly over enemy territory without EW jamming. Not a single Rafale was lost over Libya simply because of the power of Spectra.

    um, it did that all the time in Kosovo and Iraq.

    btw, the same “not a single xxx was lost in Libya” can be said for a lot of planes and they did not use jamming.

    in reply to: F-22 deployment to the gulf being reported #2286878
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Only 59 F-117As were ever built, and 6 of these already crashed prior to 1999, so how can 8 of them be deployed in 1 mission at the same time? :confused:

    Furthermore, another F-117 was damaged by gunfire though it wasn’t shot down.

    Directly from the “Horse’s Mouth”, Lt. Col Dale Zelco (the pilot of the downed F-117).

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JjbnyNGz4j8

    Starting at 06:20 (paraphrasing)

    “our one wave of 8 x F-117s”

    btw, if a second F-117 was hit by gunfire, that just reinforces my point. They had to get into gun range before being in serious trouble.

    in reply to: F-22 deployment to the gulf being reported #2286904
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    The F-117 that was shot down was at 13km distance and flying the same route it had done before.

    Nobody claims that 5th gen fighters are invisible, just that the range at which you can detect them are extremely small. The aforementioned 13km would be classified as such.

    On the night of the F-117’s loss, it was in a flight of 8 F-117s. If it were so easy to detect, why were none of the others shot down that night (or ever since)?

    in reply to: F-35 News thread. Part Deux #2287298
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    If you are going against deep bunkers, then you can hang them external if you only have the B, otherwise use the A or C.

    btw, the B is 1500lb internal (ie a fully loaded BRU-61 with 4 SDBs).

    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    IIRC, the US targeted GPS jammers in Iraq with JDAMs just to prove they did not work.

    GPS Jamming = the Y2k Scare for the military

    All hype and no substance.

    in reply to: Is there any point in VTOL Strike Aircraft today? #2289385
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Apparently the B variant was too heavy so they chose to reduce its weight by reducing the weapons bay.

    This was part of the SWAT weight reduction effort in 2003/4.

    btw, a 1k bay was the original requirement, so they have not lost anything form the original KPP. Also, the A shared the B’s original requirement for a 1k bomb and got a 2k due to commonality with the C.

    in reply to: Is there any point in VTOL Strike Aircraft today? #2289456
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    If they are smart, they will make SPEAR BRU-61 compatible and give it a SDB2 emulation mode. That way they can sell it to anyone that has SDB and mix-n-match as the mission requires.

    in reply to: Is there any point in VTOL Strike Aircraft today? #2289778
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    When it comes to LW, shaping is less effective but RAM is still relevant if it is designed with LW in mind.

    in reply to: Is there any point in VTOL Strike Aircraft today? #2289820
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    The F-22 CANNOT carry the HARM, internal or external.

    The F-35 is scheduled to get the AARGM in Blk6.

    @Amiga500:

    Why do you keep representing conflicts like there is only one way of doing things?

    1. If there is a likely threat of any serious A2A in the path of inbound F-35 strikers, then they can send along dedicated F-35 escorts with 4-6 internal AAMs up at 50k.

    2. If there are LW radars in the area, they will be the targets of multiple long ranged missile attack before the F-35s get in the area.

    3. You completely forgot about MALD and MALD-J.

    You also conveniently forgot that the Serbs shot that F-117 down at 13km. That in no way is any kind of long range shot. The F-117 also suffered from a low amount of SA, low maneuverability, and no way to defend itself. Non of that applies to the F-35.

Viewing 15 posts - 3,151 through 3,165 (of 4,849 total)