dark light

SpudmanWP

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,556 through 3,570 (of 4,849 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The AESA radar retrofit market #2375825
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    SABR and RACR weigh LESS than the MSA in the F-16

    in reply to: The AESA radar retrofit market #2375830
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Wouldn’t cooling the array be an even bigger issue in most cases?

    NG’s SABR and Raytheon’s RACR are “drop in” replacements for F-16s and are specifically made to fit within the power and cooling requirements.

    in reply to: Hot Dog's Ketchup Filled F-35 News Thread #2376685
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Yes, BF-06 is from LRIP2.

    in reply to: Blue Angels unplanned landing #2377429
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Good thing that did not happen at sea 😉

    Where do you land when the carrier closes?

    in reply to: Hot Dog's Ketchup Filled F-35 News Thread #2378363
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    How is Japan only getting a 20% offset (spread over less than 10 years) better than partner nations getting upwards of 75% or more (spread over the life of the program)?

    in reply to: Hot Dog's Ketchup Filled F-35 News Thread #2378578
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    I think they looked at what the Typhoon offered and decided it did not outweigh the loss of American relations over the sale. I think if the roles were reversed (eg if the Eurofighter was of F-35’s caliber and all the US put forth was the F-15/18), then Japan could have easily gone the other way.

    I too would have loved to see the F-35 in a knock down, drag out competition.

    in reply to: Hot Dog's Ketchup Filled F-35 News Thread #2378586
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    How is the F-35 a bad choice for Air-defense/Air-interception? It goes above m1.6 with 4 internal AMRAAMs (the F-18 cannot do that), it has an IRST, has stealthy data links, EODAS, and its radar and RwR are linked to act as a single unit, and has a radar that even the APA says is second to only the F-22’s APG-77.

    What about the F-35C makes it a better choice than the F-35 for this mission? It only has a range benefit of less than 100nm but gives up 1.5g of maneuverability, costs about $20 million more than the F-35A, has no internal gun, and does not carry any more AAMs than the F-35A.

    —edit–

    The only way to realistically lighten the C is to change the landing gear which will not give you much of a benefit. If you try and lighten the structure you will lose more g loading ability and have to retest the airframe (basically making a F-35D).

    in reply to: Hot Dog's Ketchup Filled F-35 News Thread #2378593
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Given that the F-35 is a 9g airframe, (which the F-18 is not even close to with a 7.6g limit) and the F-35 is faster than the F-18 with weapons, I think it’s pretty accurate.

    in reply to: Hot Dog's Ketchup Filled F-35 News Thread #2378702
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    The proportion of F-35s body lift vs. total lift is more than that of most other fighters, even twin engine ones like the Eurofighter, Rafale, F-18, etc and is much greater than skinny single engine fighters like the F-16, Gripen, etc.

    Obviously large spaced twin engined fighters like the SU series and the F-15 have a great amount of body lift that was proven quite convincingly when the Israeli F-15 landed with most of it’s right wing missing (remember that this was without the benefit of fbw).

    in reply to: Hot Dog's Ketchup Filled F-35 News Thread #2378710
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    F-35
    # Wing loading: 91.4 lb/ft² (446 kg/m²)

    That does not take into account the lift generated by the lifting body design of the fuselage.

    in reply to: Hot Dog's Ketchup Filled F-35 News Thread #2378722
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    I was a little off, it’s slightly under m1.6 at a very small altitude margin.

    http://i619.photobucket.com/albums/tt271/SpudmanWP/Misc/f7db578a.jpg

    in reply to: Hot Dog's Ketchup Filled F-35 News Thread #2378879
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    @Geoff: The F-35 has been flown in testing with dummy internal weapons (there are plenty of pics of this). Even after this series of tests the KPP of M1.6 with 2 AMRAAMS and 2 2k JDAMS has held.

    @Sintra: The Nikkei weekly is not just a journal, heard of the Nikkei Index much? As to “Operability/Maneuverability”, that pretty much means flight performance (remember we are talking armed, no clean airshow performance).

    in reply to: Hot Dog's Ketchup Filled F-35 News Thread #2379074
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Claims backed up by actual test data, as in turn rate, max speed, etc. For example, the max speed of the F-35 is given at M1.6 (with weapons). If you look at the performance charts of the F-18E, it can only do ~m1.4 when loaded with 4 missiles.

    in reply to: Hot Dog's Ketchup Filled F-35 News Thread #2379128
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    That was Slowman’s translation. As he hates the F-35 and thinks that it will be the “destruction” of Japan’s parts industry, I do not think he would have erred on the side of the F-35.

    in reply to: Hot Dog's Ketchup Filled F-35 News Thread #2379191
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Here is a graphic from the above Nikkei article (thanks Slowman for providing).

    The first category is “Operability/Maneuverability”, the second category is “Industrial Participation”, the third category is “Relations with the US”.

    Biggest surprise for F-35 haters is that it placed the F-35 above the F-18 and Typhoon in “Operability/Maneuverability”

    http://i619.photobucket.com/albums/tt271/SpudmanWP/comparisonxj.jpg

Viewing 15 posts - 3,556 through 3,570 (of 4,849 total)