dark light

SpudmanWP

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,871 through 3,885 (of 4,849 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Someone Besides Hot Dogs's F-35 Cyber News Thread #5 #2341596
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Yup, very sloppy paperwork and doing a cut&paste job from last year’s numbers.

    Very disappointing 🙁

    in reply to: Someone Besides Hot Dogs's F-35 Cyber News Thread #5 #2344182
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    I will have to wait till tomorrow to finish my reading.. but one thing I did notice is that they cut&paste the FY2010&FY2011 detailed info (page 59) from the FY2011 docs. Too bad because I was looking forward to seeing what deal they got in the LRIP4 (FY2010) contract signing.

    I’ll chalk it up to being lazy. But I agree with you that they completely jacked up the FUC cost on page 57.

    in reply to: Pimp My Warship #2011393
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Witcha, IIRC you are supposed to start with an existing warship, not make one up from scratch.

    in reply to: Pimp My Warship #2011416
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    The bigger question is ‘How do you make it hop up and down’? 😉

    in reply to: mig-23 vs f-16 #2345468
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Remember to take it with a grain of salt.

    According to ACIG.org, in 1982 the F-16 accounted for 14 Mig-23s, mostly with Python-3 (5 kills) and AIM-9L (5 kills). The same site puts the Mig-23 vs F-16 total at 6 all with R-23R missiles.

    One thing of note, none of the Syrian claims is confirmed while all the Israeli claims are confirmed. Syria also claimed a F-15 which we know has never lost in an A2A engagement.

    in reply to: Boeing KC-X Victory (Merged) #2346783
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    What is so “Next Gen” if it went from 1200 to 900 gpm?

    in reply to: Pimp My Warship #2011689
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Start with an Iowa class

    1. Make it a nuke boat
    2. Remove structure aft of the 2nd stack and replace with VLS
    3. Upgrade all 5″ guns with 155mm AGS
    4. Upgrade rear aviation area to handle UCAVs
    5. Install AEGIS
    6. Upgrade with both CWIS and CRAM (it is going to be a big target after all)
    7. Give it plenty of MDG-351 35-mm Millennium Gun installs (10 would be fine for anti-swarm)
    8. Clean up all the antenna clutter and give it a lower RCS structure.
    9. Modify GPS fuzes for 18″ shells
    10. Upgrade to EM & laser secondary weapons when available (AGS & CWIS replacement)
    11. Install something like EODAS from the F-35 to track all close in (<20 miles) objects.

    in reply to: Rafale's RBE2 AESA pic and news! #2347796
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Yes, but then it isn’t discrete, but rather a lighthouse.
    The most basic of “LPI” principles is to have a large antenna with low output.

    You need to think about that again. If two AESA dishes of different sizes (but all other features being the same) are generating the same amount of power, then their detectability is virtually the same.

    in reply to: Aero India: Boeing's advanced Super Hornet upgrade options #2347977
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    The wing stations of the F-35 are rated for 5000 & 2500 lbs each. Besides, Boeing has already stated that the Super Hornet can handle the pod on the wing stations. If it can do then the F-35 can too.

    The weapons pod can carry a combination of AIM-120 air-to-air missiles and air-to-ground bombs, with each Super Hornet capable of carrying three pods.

    http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=5653656&c=air;%20naval&s=TOP

    in reply to: Someone Besides Hot Dogs's F-35 Cyber News Thread #5 #2347981
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    A spiral upgrade path for the F-35 would have been worse than what they have now. Just ask the F-22 how it felt. Where are the cheek arrays, HMD, FLIR, and IRST for the F-22?

    in reply to: Aero India: Boeing's advanced Super Hornet upgrade options #2348147
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    That would make a scary DEAD escort indeed.

    in reply to: Rafale's RBE2 AESA pic and news! #2348156
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    The diameter & number of T&R modules only matters if everything else is the same.

    If the T&R module can transmit more power or has a more powerful back end, then it may makeup for the size difference.

    in reply to: Aero India: Boeing's advanced Super Hornet upgrade options #2348311
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    The pod would most likely be swapped out whole, for a full one. This might be easier.

    Here’s an idea. have a F-35 carry 2-4 of these (depending on weight). Up to 20 AMRRAMS ans still maintaining a very low RCS 🙂 Hows that for fleet defense.

    in reply to: Should the UK dump the F-35? #2348706
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    That is correct, as of now there is no verified replacement for the Super Hornet.

    in reply to: Should the UK dump the F-35? #2348987
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    F/A-XX is the planned F-35C followon.

    Wrong, it’s the F/A-18E/F follow-on.

    Boeing Phantom Works has released a new concept image for a “sixth-generation” fighter to replace the F/A-18E/F fleet after 2025.

    http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2009/07/09/329472/boeing-displays-manned-fa-xx-concept-jet.html

Viewing 15 posts - 3,871 through 3,885 (of 4,849 total)