dark light

SpudmanWP

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 4,621 through 4,635 (of 4,849 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: LCS exceeds 50 mph in testing #2017984
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Sometimes you have to get into the weeds to deal with the threats.

    Info:http://peoships.crane.navy.mil/LCS/program.htm

    in reply to: LCS exceeds 50 mph in testing #2017998
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    It is a “Litoral” Combat Ship.

    The blue navy has the advantage of a lot of time and space in which to react to a situation. The brown navy does not.

    Speed is life.

    in reply to: Underwater AIM 9-X #1810370
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    There was a pdf, which I cannot find ATM, that showed a lot of work with underwater launched SAMs. It was quite old.

    in reply to: AMRAAM #1810371
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    IIRC, the miniaturization and switch from rectangular circuit cards to circular ones (C7) freed up 6 inches that is still empty.

    That and they could develop a gel based fuel (more energetic). That would help both the 9X and the 120.

    Lets get on the ball ATK.

    in reply to: AMRAAM #1810413
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Thanks..

    in reply to: AMRAAM #1810439
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Actually, dual pulse motors have all the high impulse at the start to get it up to speed and a lower, cruise impulse later.

    in reply to: AMRAAM #1810531
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    The AMRRAM datalink can be updated from much more than radar info. There is IRST, RwR, EODAS, AWACS, and off-board sensors that all can take a role.

    The AIM-120D will get a GPS upgrade to it’s INS and allow it to find the mark much easier.

    in reply to: Price Tags of the Fighters' Deals in 21th Century #2412702
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Still cheaper than the Rafale.

    in reply to: More good JSF news and program updates #2412704
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    In my setup, the missiles are staggered, just like the F-22, and will not “bump wings” as they swivel.

    The problem with a 2nd (outer door) mounted missile is that the 3rd missile hanging in the bay could not fire because it would hit this 2nd missile.

    in reply to: AMRAAM #1810651
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    JDRADM.. IOC in 2020

    in reply to: More good JSF news and program updates #2414141
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Why not.. they are all the same weapon?

    Rotary launchers have a firing sequence.

    I did say “quick and dirty” btw. 😉

    ridiculously complex

    Have you seen what the main gear on a F-18 has to go through to get back in the bay??? This is child’s play compared to that.

    Besides, I did not say this was the “Best” way, just “A” way to do it.

    in reply to: More good JSF news and program updates #2414150
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Here is a quick and dirty mock-up of how I think they could do it.

    http://i619.photobucket.com/albums/tt271/SpudmanWP/F-356x120Weapon.jpg

    Firing sequence:
    1. Doors open
    2. Missile #1 launches
    3. Missile #2 swings inboard to allow clearance for #3
    4. #3 swings to vertical and launches
    5. #2 swings outboard to vertical and launches

    in reply to: More good JSF news and program updates #2414780
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    The ejection systems on current systems are removable… so I do not see a problem. Besides, the ejection systems on the F-35 are no longer pyrotechnic, but electromechanical.

    Worst case you remove 6-8 bolts, disconnect a power-supply and control wires.. done.

    There is plenty of room considering you are replacing a 2000lb JDAM with two AIM-120s that weigh a fraction of that.

    in reply to: More good JSF news and program updates #2414895
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    I have tried never to say “Will happen” when it comes to ANY Block upgrade to ANY plane.

    I usually say “likely” or “planned upgrade”.

    My point is that there is room, it’s technically possible, they have done strudies, they have it in their Block 5 plan, and only time will tell what ends up making it into Blk5.

    in reply to: More good JSF news and program updates #2415016
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Sorry, wrong again. I never said hard-points, just missiles.

    1. Each of the wing’s A2G/A2A stations can hold 2 AAMs each (8 total) and add the 2 A2A wingtip stations and you get a total 10 external.

    2. Every presentation that shows the weapon breakdown verifies that external AIM-120s are part of SDD… that means Block 3, not Block 5

    3. LM and JPO officials have gone on record (I will have to dig up the links) that at IOC, a total of 14 AAMs can be carried (with 4 internal).

    4. The reason that it says 6 AIM-120s is that this is the only certified AAM that has a small enough wingspan to fit and that they are not going to waste space with AIM-9X or AIM-132 since clearly an Air Superiority config.

    Here is an article quoting an LM exec confirming the plan for 6 internal AAMs.
    http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/defense/index.jsp?plckController=Blog&plckScript=blogScript&plckElementId=blogDest&plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&plckPostId=Blog%3a27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post%3a4f04259d-8fca-4e42-8e17-44f5dca7edf4

    Here is an email from the JPO

    RE: A2A weapon load of the F-35

    The F-35 will be able carry 4 missiles on internal stations and up to 10 additional missiles on external stations. To look at potential future increases in internal carriage capability, studies have been done to explore the use of advances in launcher technology, however, current mission analysis does not necessitate further exploration of these capabilities at this time.

    Thanks,
    Cheryl

    Cheryl Limrick
    F-35 Lightning II Program Office
    Assistant Public Affairs Officer
    200 12th S, Suite 600
    Arlington,VA 22202
    (o) 703-601-5503
    (c) 703-608-8965
    [email]cheryl.limrick@jsf.mil[/email]

Viewing 15 posts - 4,621 through 4,635 (of 4,849 total)