Given that the range does not “have” to be long when it comes to AShMs, especially from LO platforms, range will not be an issue and will play a backseat to avionics, ESM, and warhead size.
As far as the F-35 goes, having UAI means that anytime after Blk4, they can get it up and running on the F-35 in 30-60 days without another Block upgrade. The same holds true for other UAI platforms & weapons.
Is LRASM fully intgrated in F-35? Afaik it was mostly tested on B1B
LRASM is a UAI certified weapon and can be used on the F-35 anytime after Blk4.
Thats exactly wahy USAF is buying more F15. Large ammos areNOT a large bunch of ammos.Put 2 storms shadows under a F-35 for example to have a good laugh.
They are buying them because of “certain” members of the DoD who were NOT USAF ordered them to be purchased.
The first excuse was that it was because it was cheaper to buy and use. That turned out to be false, especially given the 3 years of dev needed to finalize the F-15EX version.
The next was that it was the only one that could carry hypersonic weapons, that was false too.
The latest and only one that will likely stick is that it will be faster & cheaper to change a unit from F-15C to F-15EX.
So, in the end, they may get them only because it was “convenient”.
Both are in Swotzerland and in Finland no?
They were bound to show sometime 😉
Besides, Belgium (with its well-published requirements book) was Rafale’s best chance to show the world that it could beat the F-35 in an apples-to-apples contest. Instead, they tried to arrange backroom deals with hidden costs and lots of “promises”. They lost due to that as all that Belgium had to do was look at India to see what Rafale’s “promises” are worth.
The Finland deal is nowhere near the level of openness or “fixed requirements” that Belgium was which is likely why they are still in it.
Same goes for Switzerland.
(unable to carry very big ammos etc.)
5k lb Is more than enough for any large munition.
Given that nobody has experience in both the GripenE (not even operational) or Rafale and the F-35, a direct comparison is not possible.
Sometimes the data comes out in competitions, but given Rafale’s proclivity to run at the first sign of an F-35, that will not likely happen either :rolleyes:
Heritage foundation is nearly (maybe even worse ) relaiable as RT… On the opposite site. bunch of old ultra liberalist so called analysts.
Thanks for confirming that you neither read the report nor watched the video.
There were lots of areas where the F-35 is struggling and JV did not hold back when reporting on them. He went into great detail on multiple occasions explaining exactly what the issue was instead of simply saying something like “They have HMDS issues but promised a quick fix”.
He also pointed out several times where pilots liked something about there their prior 4th gen jet rather than the F-35.
Things like these are exactly why Heritage is the opposite of RT, they report the good with the bad.
btw, If Heritage & JV are so Pro-F-35, why do they propose cutting the total F-35buy significantly?
Here is a followup to the Heritage.org report
John Venable writes a well done status report, from the perspective of experienced pilots and maintainers, of the F-35 and its strengths & challenges. It is long but well worth the read.
The U.S. Air Force’s first F-35A fighter wing is now fully operational. The road to this point has been filled with insights on the aircraft, simulator, maintenance and logistical support, and operations that will apply to any service or nation flying the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF). This assessment is based on interviews with 30 F-35A combat pilots as well as senior operations and maintenance leaders at Hill Air Force Base in Utah. It follows a similar assessment from 2016 of 31 other highly experienced former fourth-generation fighter pilots, who were then flying the F-35A at two other Air Force locations. The collective perspectives confirm that, while the JSF is still several years away from realizing its full potential, even now, the F-35A is the most dominant and lethal multi-role aircraft in the world.
PDF: https://www.heritage.org/sites/default/files/2019-05/BG3406.pdf
Congress wants to improve the parts issue by.. withholding half the funds :stupid:
The House panel that approves defense spending intends to withhold half of next year’s funding for F-35 spare parts until the Pentagon and Lockheed Martin Corp. agree on the sale of technical data for spare parts to improve the tracking of items and allow purchases from other suppliers.
More at the JUMP
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-05-20/f-35-spare-parts-funding-at-risk-as-pentagon-seeks-data-rights
I see the US buying a lot of cheese, chocolate, and clocks 😉
Post that in the F-35 thread as that is the place for questions & answers
The article was talking about exposed props around the cabin that soldiers can easily run into, especially in night ops or where vision could be obscured, like smoke.
Thankfully it was not a design issue…. Lord knows it’s had more than it’s fair share :dev2:
The USAF is standing up an Aggressor Unit manned with 11x F-35s. They will arrive in 2022 at Nellis AFB (Hello Red Flag).
They are going to use early Lot jets from Eglin AFB.
Air Force Secretary Heather Wilson states:
“This move will allow us to repurpose {9} early production F-35s to help train Airmen for the high end fight.”
9 jets would cover most of Lots 2 & 3 (6 & 7 F-35As respectively) plus an additional 2 from an unknown source gets to the 11.
Guess it will depend on the weighting given to offsets. Another thing I was thinking of. LM already sends a bunch of work to it’s own subs in Canada and can “guarantee some” offsets by just calling those “Offsets”. This are internal contracts that may or may not have anything to do with the JSF.
Besides, based on the Belgium contest where the F-35 won 7 out of 7 categories, even if it did not come out on top with Offsets, it should still easily win.