UAVs also require a constant comms link. Jam that and it ceases to function effectively other than being a pre-programmed cruise missile.

Even that was not a complete loss and was on the ground.

Any attempt to compare evaluations of a Fighter vs a Car (and who to trust) are irrelevant since while a reputable magazine/website can gain 1st hand access to a car in order to do their own test-drive, that will never happen in a fighter, especially a single-seat fighter.

It has nothing to do with experience and everything to do with the fact that only one of those (ie people tied to the project like the test pilot, Op pilot, Ground Crew, programmers, builders, members of Congress & their aides, etc) are going to have access to any real, unfiltered data.

the F-35 has not yet proven anything

Red Flag, Nothern Lightning, etc all disagree with you.

Answer me this, has the F-22 proven itself & how?

I think that those are “dummy” missiles (not the lack of a motor nozzle).

Anything that you can do with the Eurofighter or F-35, you can do with the F-16.

In the end, the F-16 is substantially cheaper to operate, in an apples-to-apples comparison, than the Eurofighter.

I guess it all depends on what you consider “Typhoon’s per-hour operating cost”.

Nope, I would say the same if they tried to compare ii to any other single engined fighter will thousands in service.

Jordanian Air Force Blackhawk with emblem but so far I can not find the right one

“Prince Hashim Royal Aviation Brigade”

https://www.facebook.com/PHRB5/

“Prince Hashim Bin Abdullah II, 5th Aviation Brigade”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_Special_Operations_Command_(Jordan)

[ATTACH=CONFIG]254778[/ATTACH]