dark light

Philip Morten

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 71 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Why Don't We Hear Of The Valiant? #1191639
    Philip Morten
    Participant

    so the legend goes, when the Valiant fleet were being scrapped en masse, XD818 was due to be the next in the line for the chop until someone of a substantial rank happened to recognize the serial of the aircraft as having been the first to drop a British atomic weapon and ordered the aircraft be placed aside untouched until it could be properly cleared with theyre Lordships for preservation

    XD818 was the first to drop a thermonuclear device during Op Grapple on 15 May 1957 off Malden Island – the first airdrop of a British nuclear weapon was from WZ366 during Op Buffalo at Marilinga on 11 Oct 56.

    in reply to: Question concerning phantom2 #2464821
    Philip Morten
    Participant

    It’s the EMI recon pod. Only used by RAF Phantoms, and then only by IIsqn.

    And 41 Sqn surely ?

    in reply to: Aeroplane Monthly DVD #1224796
    Philip Morten
    Participant

    I write this, not to trash Aeroplane Monthly, but to confirm if I was the only one who received a dodgy DVD? My copy only plays in Black and White. Has anyone else received a dude DVD? What do I do?

    Mine was fine, the only problem being that it did not automatically run in 4:3 aspect ratio I had to set the TV manually.

    in reply to: Canberra bombing radar/ Blue Shadow radar? #1242048
    Philip Morten
    Participant

    The radar for the B.3/45 Canberra B.1 was to be H2S Mk.9 with NBC Mk.2 but this was delayed such that the Canberra B.1 with H2S would not be ready before the H2S 9A equipped B.9/48 (Valiant) and the RAF decided that they only needed one type of high altitude blind bomber in that time scale and and that development of the radar could be concentrated on the V-bomber version.

    References
    ———-
    British Secret Projects – Jet Bombers since 1949, Tony Buttler

    English Electric Canberra, Ken Delve

    in reply to: What Happened to Snoopy? #1246770
    Philip Morten
    Participant

    There is a news item with photographs on the Airbus Military web-site at: http://airbusmilitary.com/press.html

    in reply to: Chinooks at Gosport? #2547312
    Philip Morten
    Participant

    DARA Fleetlands ( its probably called something else now) is where Chinook major survicing is done. See http://www.daranet.co.uk/default.asp?id=504

    in reply to: Spitfire tail parachute #1285080
    Philip Morten
    Participant

    Hi Qldspitty, drawing i quoted – 30027 sht 79-is for reinforcing at fr18/fr18A, i just cant see how chute was fitted or deployed. The top longeron is cut fwd of fr18 & aft of fr18A & 2 angles positioned there instead of longeron. There are doublers & other brks in there to.

    In Morgan & Shacklady p 46 there is a picture of K9787 from the left rear where you can see what appears to be a separate panel ( doors ? ) in the upper fuselage between those frames. The rudder horn balance guard also seems to be fitted. The text says:

    The Air Ministry was not completely satisfied with the spin recovery of the Spitfire, and at a meeting on 17 January 1938, chaired by Air Cdr. Verney, Supermarine persuaded those in attendance that no modifications be made to production aircraft apart from the addition of an anti-spin parachute. For the Air Ministry Verney said that based upon model tests at Farnborough production aircraft could not be passed for spinning even with a tail parachute. Supermarine then pointed out that Jeffrey Quill had made sixteen successful spins of eight turns in the prototype. After more discussion the DTD agreed to accept the Supermarine proposal and that the first 20 production models should be fitted with the tail parachute and undergo further spinning trials. He, DTD, would be satisfied with recovery at 15,000 ft. When the first production Mk 1 Spitfire, K9787, was completed at the beginning of May 1938 an anti-spin parachute was duly fitted and the aircraft made its first flight from Eastleigh, piloted by Quill, on 14th of the same month .

    There is also a picture of K9791 on p 51 which clearly shows tge rudder balance horn guards.

    in reply to: Nimrod MR.1 XV252 question #2517051
    Philip Morten
    Participant

    Hi Guys,

    Hope I’ve posted this to the right section. Does anyone know anything more about the markings on this 201 Sqn Nimrod photographed at Greenham, June 29, 1981?

    http://www.jetphotos.net/link/photo_link.php?id=176983

    Obviously the bird is the 201 squadron emblem, but did anyone out there ever photograph this aircraft and ca say what the other markings on the fin are?

    Many thanks in advance!

    There is a photograph of XV252 ( which of course at that time was an MR.1 ) at IAT ’81 at http://www.abpic.co.uk/photo/1023278/ which shows only the squadron marking, fleet number and the national markings on the fin so the other marking was presumably added during the show – maybe a zap from one of the other units there or an IAT badge of some kind ?

    in reply to: RAF C17 FLEET EXPANSION #2517069
    Philip Morten
    Participant

    Fantastic news got any links to the site for conformation?

    That announcement was about a month ago, see:

    http://www.mod.uk/DefenceInternet/DefenceNews/EquipmentAndLogistics/BrownePurchaseOfExtraC17WillsignificantlyBoostUkMilitaryOperations.htm

    in reply to: Handley Page Victor dimensions sought #2521460
    Philip Morten
    Participant

    An interesting concept, although the much smaller Skybolt was carrier externally. I wonder why internal carriage was rejected for Skybolt? Perhaps because of the B-52’s relatively small bomb bay?

    I believe that was because it had a star tracker which required a good field of view before launch.

    Philip Morten
    Participant

    After repairs were made it was given to 91 Squadron for Air Service Training. On the 14th February 1941 118 Squadron took the plane over with the serial number NK – T .

    On the 4th of August 1941 P7505 was again used for Air Service Training, until the 2nd of September 1941 when the plane was converted to a Mk VB and fitted with a Merlin 45 engine. It was then delivered back to 54 Squadron until 5th January 1942?

    I think you are misinterpreting ‘Air Service Training’ here. Air Service Training (AST) at Hamble and other locations were a company that formed part of the Civilian Repair Organisation, what this is actually saying is that the aircraft went to AST for the repairs to the Cat 2 damage and later for conversion to Mk.Vb.

    in reply to: Larkhill & Upavon #1300827
    Philip Morten
    Participant

    I’ve uploaded a few photos of Upavon airfield taken last year, quality not too good through the canopy. You can see aircraft of both the Wyvern club ( right side of the launch point ) and 622 VGS.

    http://picasaweb.google.co.uk/philip.morten/Upavon

    in reply to: Latest Withams sale – Comet Fuse ID? #1307265
    Philip Morten
    Participant

    My brother in law has a photograph of a Spitfire with the letters RA in front of the roundel and GJ after it. I told him it was evidently a senior officer as they were allowed to use their initials as codes. Has anyone any idea how I can trace who it was?

    Ken

    Not quite sure what this is doing in this thread, but four character squadron codes were used postwar by Royal Auxiliary Air Force units when they were part of Reserve Command, RAG was used by 600 (City of London) Sqn R.Aux.A.F at Biggin Hill on its Spitfires between 1946 and 1949. See http://www.rafweb.org/Sqn600-604.htm

    in reply to: Duxford tomorrow…pricing #1318108
    Philip Morten
    Participant

    It’s on the Duxford web site at: http://duxford.iwm.org.uk/server/show/nav.00d002

    Battle of Britain Memorial Flight Welcome Day Admission Prices

    Advance Purchase tickets for this event are available for sale up to the dates shown below (which vary for UK and International delivery). Any ticket bought in advance through the Ticket Office will be at the advance purchase price.

    For further information on advance tickets please call the Ticket Office on 01223 499 353 or email at [email]advancetickets@iwm.org.uk[/email] Proof of status may be requested on the day.
    On The Gate
    Child Free
    Adult £19.95

    in reply to: Fancy a Curtiss Sparrowhawk? #1255377
    Philip Morten
    Participant

    Great Pics,

    Thanks a lot.

    They will help answer some of my detailing questions. It is those pesky shots from above that are the hard to get ones!

    I was not sure if the A/C was still there. I had heard rumor that it had been lent to the Naval Air Museum in Pensacola (only a 9 hour drive from me!) I’ve got to get up to DC sometime and see the NASM Collection. There, and the collection at Dayton.

    Those pictures were taken on 23 Dec 06 so it was definately still there then

    Being that it is the only existing model of that make, I believe it was built from spares. Most of them were lost when the Akron and Macon went down.

    Well, built from the best parts of several surviving aircraft, according to the description on the NASM web site – http://www.nasm.si.edu/research/aero/aircraft/curtiss_f9c.htm

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 71 total)