When you think he is only 23 or 24 in the second picture. 🙁
It’s also, if I remember correctly, written in present tense which makes every word just that much more tense and alive.
Quite agree just started reading Spitfire Pilot written during the war by a Pilot killed in 44. Although its a good read its written in an entirely different way glossing over the obvious strain of combat.
Geoffrey was very young, joined the RAF at 17 and a well experianced battle hardened Pilot 18 months after leaving school. I would imagine it took a much greater toll on these very young Pilots as compared to someone like Stanford Tuck who had quite a bit of life experiance before the RAF.
A Pilot who was a good Friend of mine Squadron Leader Dave Glaser also flew in the Battle with 65 Squadron at 19 years old and continued operationally until the end of the war, I just cannot imagine how he coped all the way through with a total of 3000 hours on operations.
You can get an idea of the physical effects when you compare his pictures in 1940 and 1945 he looks 20 years older!
MKI thats a really pretty aircraft, if you dont mind me asking how much would it cost to build something like this? does it have retracts and what sort of performance would you expect. I saw one flying at Upminster in the Summer until it got on the ground i thought it was full size.
Yes its definately a V8 Rover engine.
PM sent david
The engraving is wrong – it was done in the 80’s by a company who shall remain nameless.
Some original engraved legends were plastic, some were aluminium. None looked like that!
Bruce
Hello Bruce
Are the ones in Ians link repros?
I am now completely confused, you mentioned the brake lever before pursuing the identity of the part pictured. Anyway like i said if its a heavy bomber wreck there would be tons of stuff covered in constructors part numbers. Why the big secret about the enquiry? it hardly seems urgent considering you already mentioned it on another thread. I suppose i ought to be careful I might get another infraction to add to the other two you gave me and I am still confused about. :confused::confused::confused::confused:
Im agree it doesnt look like a British part at all to me, it may be its simply a coinidence that the part nos appears lanc its certainly not part of the trailing edge.
The fuel gauge 37 gallon shown is a repro ! The donors still cost around £200 even on ebay.
Im not saying its port wing.
The part number is not shown on the drawing you have to look it up. The Lancaster has a very complicated parts numbering system, there are four pages just explaining how to locate the numbers. Basically you have to locate the part on the drawing and then look up the number. To find a small piece like you have would take hours if not days. Every bolt and washer has an individual number.
Heres the drawing I am getting part nos 45/F 3943 for rib 15 attachment nothing on the trailing edge looks like this part to me.
However, there’s a bloke in Dorset who runs an aircraft spares website that advertises the illustrated spare parts catalogue for the Lanc. Perhaps he could be pursuaded to leaf through it for final confirmation (when he’s not out scaring the locals)?
Somerset actually :rolleyes:
It does not look like an English manufactured part, never seen a finish like that on any Wartime British warbid and the part numbering is not normally in that format.
If this is the biggest recognisable part the plane it must have been smashed into little pieces. From my limited knowledge of crash sites something that crashed that hard leaves thousands of splintered parts and some of these should have the manufactures codes EA.
At the risk of drifting somewhat off-topic, are there any records as to how Allied Jewish PoWs were treated by the Nazis?
I would think it highly unlikely they carried anything to ID them as Jewish if operating over Enemy Terratory so probably ended up in the standard POW camp. If they had been discovered to be Jewish I think theres little doulbt they have gone the same way as the 6 million others.