Flogger wrote
or in few words that cover ups are called accidents
So this is what you actually believe? Years after the event elaborate stories are concocted in order to cover up combat losses?
Is this what you also believe in relation to UK Harrier losses over Yugoslavia in 1999? I take it you still believe in those? I notice you went troll and failed to reply a few post back!
Russian sources claim western tanks destroyed by Iraqi Mi-24 see this
And of course you believe these stories? It is as bad as the fantasy tale generated to give a ficticious Yugoslav MiG-29 pilot an F-117 kill over Serbia. Read the story they even had the Iraqi Hinds up shooting down helos! The Iraqis ceased flying anything combat related on 19 March 2003, let alone engaging Coaliton forces with them.
Of course you probably believed this one as well?!
Иракское телевидение распространило кадры, снятые на месте, куда якобы рухнул сбитый утром в четверг (ФОТО. ВИДЕО) над южным районом Ирака американский истребитель F/A-18 Hornet. И выяснилось, что русскоязычному телезрителю эта съемка может сказать больше, чем иракцу или американцу.
Накануне Ирак объявил, что ему удалось сбить F/A-18, а через некоторое время, эту информацию подтвердили и в западной коалиции. По их версии, самолет сбит ракетой земля-воздух. И вот, Ирак показывает видео-подтверждение “своего успеха”.
На кадрах видно большое количество технологического хлама и обломков непонятных металлических конструкций. Вокруг – радующиеся люди с автоматами, вероятно – иракские ополченцы, сообщает телеканал ТВС. Но, при ближайшем рассмотрении, выясняется, что надпись на одном из обломков сделана на русском языке – “Резервуар для сжатого воздуха”. Также был показан другой обломок – с различимой надписью “При транспортировке за колпаки не браться”.
Всему этому, по мнению ТВС, можно найти два объяснения: либо эти кадры – не более чем агитационный клип, для съемок которого собрали множество старых разнородных обломков военной техники, либо – это обломки сделанной в России ракеты, которая собственно, и сбила американский истребитель. Последний вариант, похоже, более вероятен – эксперты говорят, что детали с русскими надписями очень похожи на элементы конструкции старой советской ракеты 3М-8, которой комплектовались зенитные комплексы “Круг”. Подобные машины стояли на вооружении иракских ПВО.
И последнее сообщение о сбитом Hornet, которое окончательно запутывает ситуацию – телеканал SkyTV сообщил со ссылкой на источники в Пентагоне, что американский истребитель был сбит ракетой, выпущенной из комплекса Patriot, стоящего на вооружении американских ПВО..
По данным британцев, крушение F-18 стало еще одним примером так называемого “дружественного огня”, от которого союзные войска понесли пятую часть потерь. Впрочем, сообщает ТВС, эту новость британский телеканал сопровождал все той же картинкой с обломками техники советского производства.
Американские военные по-прежнему отказываются сообщить подробности инцидента и уточнить место падения самолета. Неясно также, летел ли самолет на боевое задание, или возвращался после него. Сообщается, что пилот истребителя погиб.
Iraqi television has shown images at the the spot where the alleged F-18 wreckage stands. On Thursday morning (FOTO. VIDEO) over the southern region of Iraq an American fighter F/A-18 Hornet was shot down. And it turned out that the Russian-speaking viewers, can say more than the Iraqi or American public can about the subject.
Prior to this Iraq, announced that Iraq was able to shoot down F/A-18s, and after some time, confirmed this information to the media. In their version, an Iraqi surface to air missile shot down the F-18. Now, the Iraqies have shown video evidence of their success.”
At close it coud be seen many technological trash and incomprehensible fragments of metal constructions. Surrounding it by jubilant people with machine guns, probably, the Iraqi militia, it was reported by the TV channel TVS. But when making a close view of the wreckage , it appears that the inscription on one of the wreckage fragments was written in Russian – “The shell of compressed air.” Also shown was another piece of wreckage from the inscription reading in Russian “Transportation for the caps do not.”
All this, according to TVS, you can find two explanations: either those images are no more than a campaign clip, for the downing which gathered many disparate fragments of old military equipment, or the wreckage was of Russia missiles, which in fact, shot down an American F-18 fighter. The latter option seems more likely, experts say the debris with Russian inscriptions are very similar to parts of the old Soviet missiles 3 M-8, which formed the Iraqi air defense complexes. Such machines stood armed with Iraqi air defense.
The last reported downing of an F-18 Hornet was a confusing situation, SkyTV-TV channel reported with reference to sources in the Pentagon that the American fighter was shot down by a Patriot surface to air missile of the American air defense units.
According to the British, the downing of the F-18 was another example of so-called “friendly fire” which accounted one fifth of the western coallition losses. However, TVS reports, this news was broadcast by the British TV channel with all the same pictures of debris of the Soviet-made equipment.
The American military continues to refuse to announce details of the incident and clarify the place of the crash. It was also unclear whether the aircraft was flying at a combat mission, or returning after it. It was reported that the fighter pilot was killed.
Friendly Fire, a cover up or a Russian missile shooting down a F-18? a Patriot surface to air missile or a Russian surface to air missile?
source
http://www.newsru.com/world/03apr2003/iraq_tv.html
http://forums.airbase.ru/2003/05/07/topic-19811–Sbityj-F18.html
At the end buddy if Russia got an F-14 from what ever the source is something i am not sure but at least the Ministry of defence of the Soviet Union wrote a book about the F-14 interesting do not you think so?
So the U.S. authorities went to all this trouble just to deny an Iraqi SAM operator a kill?
http://www.boston.com/news/world/articles/2004/12/11/human_error_cited_in_jet_hit_by_patriot/
http://www.globalsecurity.org/org/news/2004/040205-patriot-shootdown.htm
http://www.globalsecurity.org/org/news/2004/040205-patriot-accuracy.htm
http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2005/02/08/a_finding_of_deadly_errors/
http://www.aviationtoday.com/pressreleases/8587.html
http://www.meridianmagazine.com/photoessay/030425soldier1.html
Lots of Iraqi SAMs went ballistic and simply fell back to earth along with their boosters. Bear in mind that the Iraqi’s staged in Baghdad a complete propaganda farce where they pretended to search for shot down allied crew members hiding in reeds in the Tigris. It was beamed live across the world as the crowds got larger. The Iraqis claimed they had captured a pilot and were searching for another in the reeds. The crowd dispersed happily thinking that what they had been told was factual.
Nice to see a Tiffie that looks all dirty and used:D , damn good pics too, you must have been using an inter stellar telescope to get them ones:eek: .
Regards,
John.
Thanks for the comments.
John,
They were all taken with a 300mm. The display, I believe, was a bit of a taster for the 2008 season.
Thanks for the comments!
Cheers
TJ
Hmmm, bit of a discrepency here
http://www.liberty05.com/civilwar/civil87.html
‘October 16, 1986 During a raid against Palestinian positions, an Israeli F16 was shot in Saida. One of the two Israeli pilots was captured while Israel saved the second in a helicopter operation.’
http://www.acig.org/artman/publish/article_278.shtml
‘Mortally injured, Lt. Lange died in the hands of Lebanese civilians and Syrian troops. Most likely his aircraft got hit because it was the last in the Intruder-formation and the only fully-loaded with bombs, which made it less capable to manoeuver and evade enemy fire. (SIGMA via Tom Cooper)’
Flogger,
Always double check your sources!
The image shows Lt. Mark “Doppler” Lange, not an Israeli pilot

From
http://www.ejection-history.org.uk/project/YEAR_Pages/1983.htm

Flogger are you trying to link up that image to the story of the F-16 lost in Iraq?
Flogger check the tail. That is a Royal Danish Air Force F-16 that ran off the runway in Afghanistan.
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=42368
Surprisingly, not that often.. In DS1, seveal allied aircraft were downed by SAM or AAA, how many wreckage photos have you seen?
Speicher’s F/A-18 went down in A-A combat, I have never seen any pics from the crash site yet.
Images do exist of Lt. Cmdr. Speicher’s F/A-18 wreckage. To date they have never been released to the public. On a side note it took five years for Capt Scott O’Grady’s F-16 wreckage to be found. It was stumbled across by a hunter on a mountainside.
http://www.pownetwork.org/saudi/sd017_4.htm
‘In December, 1993, a Qatari official and his hunting party came upon Lt. Cmdr. Speicher’s aircraft wreckage in Iraq. He immediately forwarded to U.S. military officials pictures of the plane’s canopy, a shard of metal with serial numbers, and passed on his recollection of having seen the ejection seat as well.’
http://www.nationalalliance.org/gulf/intel.htm
‘In December 1993, a US F/A-18 crash site in Southwestern Iraq was located and US authorities were notified. The wreckage was confirmed to be that of LCDR Speicher’s aircraft. The site was located on imagery in April 1994, using US U-2 imagery taken in 1991. On 14 February 1995, the ICRC, at the request of the USG, contacted Iraq about the US plan to excavate an F/A-18
crash site in Iraq. Baghdad delayed the matter until late October 1995 when Iraqi permission for the team’s entry was obtained.
The team was in Iraq from 9-16 December. The investigators passed the approximate location of the crash site to their Iraqi contacts on the night of 9 December. The ICRC team traveled to the location the next morning. The ICRC team found evidence that the site had been expertly searched within one month prior to the team’s arrival: the Iraqis excavated the cockpit area of the wreckage and removed all significant cockpit debris. A US Navy F/A-18 aircraft mishap investigator who participated in the 1995 ICRC excavation also believed the wreckage was likely examined in the month preceding the survey but that major portions of the cockpit and instrument bay section were removed years prior to the ICRC team’s arrival.
Analysis of the wreckage by US Navy experts concluded that LCDR Speicher initiated the ejection sequence, jettisoned the canopy, and likely ejected from the stricken aircraft prior to the crash. The canopy was located near the crash site; the ejection seat could not be found. Investigators were able to examine other parts of the aircraft including large portions of the wings and the fuselage behind the cockpit, the canopy frame, the engines, and wing pylons. In addition, the team recovered a data storage unit and fragments of life support equipment, as well as a flight suit handed over by the Iraqis. (see below)
US Navy analysis of the F/A-18 wreckage resulting from the 1995 crash-site excavation showed the forward part of LCDR Speicher’s aircraft suffered a catastrophic event in the early morning hours of 17 January 1991. At the time of the first impact LCDR Speicher’s F/A-18 was at 28,000 feet and traveling at .92 Mach (540 kts). The Hornet suffered a power loss, prior to the canopy being jettisoned. Evidence indicates the impact threw the aircraft laterally off its flight path at least 50 to 60 degrees, subjecting the aircraft to a minimum 6-G load’
I agree, it is merely posturing, and should not be taken seriously.
The Bear is good for little more than maritime patrol, and ASW.PLaneguy51
That would be the Tu-142 Bear F. You are aware of the Tu-95MS Bear H and what it is capable of carrying?
Outstanding work, Gary. Thanks for posting! 🙂
Outstanding work, Darren! Thanks for posting. 🙂
The Russians would have to declare this nuclear capable cruise missile under treaty conditions. Treaty inspectors from both sides respectively still visit and inspect each others long-range nuclear assets.
They display munitions for initial technical exhibitions. The same would happen if say the US or Russia put a new heavy strategic bomber into service.
Photographs from the technical exhibition of AS-15s


If the missile has technically entered service then the Russians have to declare it and show it for an inspection.
Of course it’s a cover up !
They built new ones. The jigs are still intact, they just have been moved to that secret facility.
And Tomcats are still flying off the USS America, too.Ok, I’ll get my coat … 😀
Shhhh, don’t give Flogger ideas! It was bad enough trying to convince him that RAF Harrier losses over Yugoslavia in 1999 weren’t being covered up and didn’t actually take place! Of course the cover up is still very active today. RAF Cottesmore and Wittering are at breaking point trying to keep aircraft spotters and photographers from discovering those Harrier losses. The cost is immense, but still those pesky aircraft enthusiasts have not worked out how they do it? And of course Flogger hasn’t quite worked out how combat losses could remain hidden under a Blair government and still remain after he left power?
http://www.harrierlist.co.uk/List.html
http://www.thunder-and-lightnings.co.uk/spotting/cottesmore.html
http://www.thunder-and-lightnings.co.uk/spotting/wittering.html
No doubt Flogger will have all the answers?
See Flogger,
Always check your sources. The Russian news agency tried to pass off the image taken during 1999 for a claim in 2006.
Those images are widely available on the web.
The image is from one of the Apache crashes in Albania.

From the following website
One of the worst fakes on the web and still Dr Carlo Kopp falls for it! Enough said.