dark light

TEEJ

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,831 through 1,845 (of 2,134 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Aircraft at Glastonbury ? #1262533
    TEEJ
    Participant

    Did any body else notice the fleeting glimpses of aircraft during the BBC coverage of Glastonbury. I saw an interview in the cockpit of a large airliner type. And also in the back ground was what looked to be the fuselage of an Andover in transport command livery.

    These are from 2005. Probably what you saw?

    http://www.urban75.org/photos/glasto/glasto146.html

    http://www.urban75.org/photos/glasto/glasto152.html

    in reply to: Aircraft identification help! #518685
    TEEJ
    Participant

    C-5 galaxy

    Not a C-5. The C-5 is T-tailed.

    TEEJ
    Participant

    On the strength of the info you supplied, Everett told me by email, that they still have XX842. I may be able to purchase a small part of her to present to my son as a keepsake. I will keep you informed!

    That’s great news!

    TEEJ
    Participant

    Thank you very much, what a quick response:)

    Not a problem. Glad to have helped. Corgi do a model of this Jaguar, serial XX842, when it was T.2

    http://www.tricatus.co.uk/aa35405.htm

    in reply to: How Low Can You Go?? #1267706
    TEEJ
    Participant

    three insane tornado pilots

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7IwplA7_4lU

    the third aircraft is a bit too low! was anyone at brize norton family day a couple of years back when the vc10 did a flyby with full flap, and idle engines, as soon as he got overhead, flaps up and whacked the throttle forward? gazeebo’s went everywhere :D:D:D also heard about buccaneers in the american desert taking the tops of sand dunes with their wingtips they were that low! awesome 😀

    Those are not Tornadoes in that video. Those are Alpha Jets. If you freeze around 21/22 timescale you will see the classic Alpha Jet tail. You can also make out white markings on the tails. They look like Belgian Alpha Jets.

    TEEJ
    Participant

    The serial is XX842

    http://www.raf.mod.uk/downloads/wallpapers/jag/jag_06_0800.jpg

    http://www.targetlock.org.uk/jaguar/production_uk.html

    ‘First flight 04 Jun 1975. Allocated to 226 OCU, to No 54 Sqd in Jul 1975 and No 41 Sqd in Sep 1976. It was transfered to No II(AC) Sqd following overhaul in late 1986. It returned to No 6 Sqd in Oct 1988. Spent time on loan to the ETPS and RAE Farnborough in 1989/90. Was in short-term store at Shawbury between Aug 1994 and Jul 1996. It was allocated to No 41 Sqd as ‘FV’ in Jul 1996. It was upgraded to T.4 in Oct 2000. It was then loaned to Warton as part of the Adour upgrade program. It returned to Coltishall on 31 Oct 2002, when it was allocated to No 16(R) Sqd. In Mar 2005 it was allocated to No 41 Sqd as ‘FX’. Arrived at St Athan in Feb 2006 for spares recovery. It was sold to Everett Aero on 10 Aug 2006 and trucked to Bentwaters.’

    http://www.everettaero.com/

    in reply to: Gina – The G.91 #2544229
    TEEJ
    Participant

    Portugal used to equip its G.91s with AIM-9s.

    in reply to: All roads lead to Waddington? #1268947
    TEEJ
    Participant

    http://www.waddingtonairshow.co.uk/travel.asp?cpID=15

    I presume that you are coming from the south? If you take the A607 then you could find yourself syphoned off to the White Lane/Tower Lane (see map) entrance. This route takes you over the runway. The same goes for the A15 route. It all depends on the traffic at the time as to which entrance that you are directed to. If you are not directed off to White Lane/Tower Lane from the A607 then you will enter the base from the main entrance. If you are on the A15, and don’t get directed off to Tower Lane, then you will enter the base at the crash gate up near to the Waddington Aircraft Viewing Area (WAVE).

    in reply to: Flaklands Flypast #2545066
    TEEJ
    Participant

    Fascinating – hadn’t thought it through. When you think about the Sopwith Camel etc possibly the pioneer of ‘relaxed stability’ then it is true you want your plane to be as manoeuvrable as technically possible. Life and death as they say.

    I am not comfy with the notional term ‘fighter’ when applied to the SHAR. Call me pernickty but I’d say it is more of an interceptor – given its original role of fleet defence against Sov Bears.

    That said I wonder about the Hawk then. There were 9 +of those chaps up there.

    The Sea Harrier F/A2 had its pop-up ram-air turbine emergency power generator deleted due to its lack of glide capability. The FRS.1 had the ram-air turbine fitted. The Hawk obviously has a better glide capability and has an Auxiliary Power Unit and Ram Air Turbine.

    in reply to: Flaklands Flypast #2545317
    TEEJ
    Participant

    Sorry at least one example of the SHAR should have been made avilable for the flypast yesterday.
    Its not like this date was not going to happen!!!
    Its been a long time coming.

    Current Government should be ashamed.

    Paul

    Even if a Sea Harrier was made available for the flypast it wouldn’t have been allowed to fly over London.

    http://www.gnn.gov.uk/environment/fullDetail.asp?ReleaseID=292040&NewsAreaID=2&NavigatedFromDepartment=True

    ‘Harriers will not take part in the flypast over London because single engine aircraft without the capability to glide in the event of an engine failure are not permitted to fly low over central London. Were they to take part, they would have to fly too high to be part of the display. Harriers will, however, take part in a flypast at Pangbourne College on 14 Jun 07 in the presence of Her Majesty The Queen. ‘

    in reply to: Flaklands Flypast #2545548
    TEEJ
    Participant

    Just caught the Beeb’s coverage of the Flaklands War parade down the Mall. Very mixed feelings about it. We all salute our brave troops but this makes me so cross – having Thatcher there was bad enough but it was what wasn’t there that will cause us plane fans gnash our teeth the most. That and that p*llock Snow doing the Janet & John commentary.

    He told us some pish about why the SHARs were absent. Single engine planes not safe over London – durh. It closed with the Reds in their Hawks… and what about the BBMF?

    OK the Victors are long gone (without them it would have been a non-event) but to ground the SHARs and not permit even a trio is shameful. We had a quartet of Typhoons and various other planes with vague relevance (Dominies…?) nice to see but dubious when there’s no SHARs and even ADVs (for their RAF Stanley duties).

    Some explanations as to types of aircraft that you saw

    http://www.mod.uk/DefenceInternet/DefenceNews/HistoryAndHonour/FlypastBringsCurtainDownOnFalklandsCommemorativeEventsvideo.htm

    http://www.royal-navy.mod.uk/server/show/ConWebDoc.9435

    The Dominies were from 55 Squadron. 55 Squadron flew Victors during Operation Corporate. The Typhoon, although not from 29 Squadron in the end, was to represent the Phantoms air defence coverage of Ascension Island during Op Corporate. The Apache was to represent the AAC Squadrons involved etc. The Hawks were representing the Vulcan (Vulcan formation) and the Harriers (FRS.1 & GR.3s). It is suggested that it was the poor glide ratio on engine failure that would have prohibited a Sea Harrier overflight if they had still been available or even in service.

    in reply to: Flaklands Flypast #2545564
    TEEJ
    Participant

    RAF Stanley ceased to exist on 30 April 1986. The Phantoms moved to RAF Mount Pleasant and were replaced by the Tornado in 1992.

    in reply to: Brize Norton Typhoon flypast #2545791
    TEEJ
    Participant
    in reply to: BBMF flyover at Donnington Park (sort of). #2507186
    TEEJ
    Participant

    Was at a rock festival at Donnington Park at the weekend, was quite suprised to see the Spitfire and Hurrican from the BBMF come flying over to land at neighbouring East Midlands Airport.

    Was there an airshow at the weekend?

    RAF Cosford was the main airshow, but there was other BBMF displays.

    http://www.bbmf.co.uk/june07.html

    in reply to: Indian SHAR Fa.2's #2508423
    TEEJ
    Participant

    Hats of to India, for having the intelligence to know that the FRS.2 Sea Harrier still has combat potential in today’s environment.
    It is a quantum leap over the FRS.1 Sea Harrier, regardless!
    Its beyond visual range engagement capability will be most welcomed, although I do not know how India would go acquiring Aim-120 AMRAAM`s!
    I say India should go for its push to get FSR.2`s, till it gets its new carriers, equipped with MiG-29K into service!

    Regards
    Pioneer

    An Indian delegation came to the UK and inspected the F/A.2 airframes. They decided not to go ahead with the purchase.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,831 through 1,845 (of 2,134 total)