Nice pics. I got lucky with the Tonka and the light!
Hi everyone,
I spoke to one of the technicians working on the Canberra. He told me they had three operational Canberra’s left. And indeed, the markings next to the cockpit are missionmarkings from Iraq. They represent the different scud-missiles/sites they discovered.
Greetz,
Dimitri
Not SCUDs, but purely the various short-range ballistics that the Iraqi’s had in their inventory. For example the Al Samoud.
Flogger,
You are again off in a fantasy land. The captured aircrew were under extreme duress to make those interviews. Have you actually seen the footage of those aircrew and the things that they said in them? They were told what to say and that includes saying that they were shot down in Iraq. The Iraq’s considered Kuwait to be their 19th Province.
Sorry Flogger, but your attempts at trying to find evidence in support of the Russian version are laughable based on which desert was stated.
The Tornado wreckage was recovered in Kuwait. That is where the intercom audio tape came from. I take it that you have heard the intercom audio?
Flogger have you attempted contact with the aircrew as of yet? Will they lie to you if they take the time to reply to you? Bellini has already stated that the target was 20km NW of Kuwait City. Explain to me how he ended up inside Iraq as per the Russian claim?
You’ll find F-16 pilots, past and present, on the following website:
We all have zillions of Scud pictures, but in all those years, never been able to catch one of a Scud launch. Not to mention a video. Has anybody been lucky ?
😎
The US have test launched a few over the years. A recent test phase had launches a few years back. From the 2002 test launch.
TEEJ
Let`s start by parts and case by case.
Fist the AH-64 shot down, the fact is the AH-64 was shot down why we know the Ah-64 was shot down? well that was release by Western news outlets such as CNN or ABC news, ABC got the report from US military sources about the SA-7 kill of an AH-64
The Funny thing about those pictures is both are of two different helicopters and both are claimed as Accidents eh?
Here we have the list of AH-64 shot down in Iraq just in the Year 2003October 30, 2003 – AH-64D Apache 86-9009 of 6-6th Cav crashed near Balad AAF, Iraq.
.
October 23, 2003 – AH-64D Apache 86-8972 crashed in Iraq while approaching to land at Kirkuk. The APU clutch failed and started a fire. Aircraft landed safely but fuselage was almost completely burnt through.August 14, 2003 – AH-64A Apache of 1-14th Avn crashed in Iraq.
June 12, 2003 – near Baghdad, AH-64D Apache of 101st Avn helicopter shot down; pilots rescued.March 31, 2003 – AH-64D Apache 84-24201 of C Company/1-3rd Avn crashes on landing in Iraq, injuring the two pilots.
March 28, 2003 – Two AH-64D Apaches, 97-5032 (A Co) and 98-5068 (B Co) of 2-101st Avn crash in Iraq; one pilot injured.
March 27, 2003 – Apache helicopter shot down in southern Iraq.March 24, 2003 – AH-64D Apache 85-25407 from C Company/1-227th Avn shot down; two pilots taken prisoner.
As you see both Pictures are supossedly accidents :rolleyes: but very well they can be shot down Helicopters too.
About the Tornado what bothers you? first an Air to Air missile can beat a Panavia Tornado as well as a SAM, the Russians sources claim something logic, The fact is the Panavia Tornado was shot down and the Pilot taken prisioner if you ask about the Gun camera showing the Panavia Torando shot down well where are the F-15`s gun camera images from GWI?
In few words the kill was made and the Russian and Iraqies claimed it was made by a MiG-23.
We know the Panavia was shot dwon and the pilot taken prisioner because that was aired by Western news outlets too.
Technically it is not impossible that could had happened sicne the Panavia Tornado can be shoot down by a AAM tooThe F-117 case is a little bit more complex for one reason. the Russian military just in 2006 made an statement claiming a F-117 was Shot down by a SAM and detected by old Radars, and at least two other F-117 were hit.
Why? because they claimed they could detect the F-117, Possible? Yes it is possible
the Russian Air force commander in chief Vladimir Mikhaylov Just claimed in 2006 that with old radars the F-117 was shot down proving that the idea of Stealth just for the sake of stealth has proven wrong, in fact he claimed at least 2 more F-117 were damagedSome claimed one of those damaged was rendered useless after the landing.
It is true the Russian military now claims one F-117 was hit by a SAM and not a MiG-29, nevertheless they claimed the Russian made Radars and weaponry detected and hit more aircraft than just two F-117s.
This was a ccording a report that apeared in Russian aviation news
Here is the linkRussian general comments about the detectability of the F-117 when was shot down theories about what shot down the F-117
Theories about what shot down the F-117
Flogger wrote:
“The Funny thing about those pictures is both are of two different helicopters and both are claimed as Accidents eh?”
No the funny thing is that you did no research on the image on the Russian webpage. They were quite content to pass it off as the actual AH-64. Flogger you fell into the trap of believing word for word and picture for picture on a Russian webpage as fact. All it would have taken is a simple search on the web to find the exact same image from 2003. If you had done this simple task, instead of simply relying on Russian webpages, then you wouldn’t be making a fool of yourself. Simple isn’t it?
Flogger,
You are showing stunning naivety. The naivety of a 13 year old perhaps? Aircraft crash in warzones to many reasons. You are showing absolutely stunning naivety when you question those accidents. Not everything is a result of enemy action. In Flogger fantasy land perhaps, but not in the real world. Helos for example in desert conditions can face ‘brown out’. It is all right for yourself to put “he he he’s” and convert it into your own fantasy theories, but it is a common fact that aircraft crash due to all manner of reasons in and out of warzones. Obviously you cannot understand this simple fact!
Flogger wrote:
“In few words the kill was made and the Russian and Iraqies claimed it was made by a MiG-23.”
In a few words no. The claims were made in Russian and Ukrainians magazines long after the events. If the claim had been made by the Iraqi’s then don’t you think that this pilot would have been a national hero?
So Colonel Bellini is lying is he Flogger?
Read his 2004 account. I see that you were very selective with the information contained there!
http://www.seatejectcolor.com/seat/stories/iraq91/eject.htm
His target was approx 20km northwest of Kuwait City. The Tornado IDS, serial MM7074, was shot down in Kuwait as they ran in with their bombs to target.
In Floggerland Colonel Bellini must be lying.
Flogger do some research. You can contact Colonel Bellini through the Italian Ministry of Defence.
http://www.aeronautica.difesa.it/dfu/StatoMaggiore/Capo_SM.asp
Colonel Cocciolone was based in Afghanistan during 2005:
http://www.aeronautica.difesa.it/SitoAM/Default.asp?idnot=14037&idsez=578&idarg=&idente=1398
Use the Italian Ministry of Defence to contact the aicrew of MM7074 Flogger. You believe that they were shot down by an Iraqi MiG. Do some positive research and contact them. Flogger will the aircrew still be lying to you in 2006 because their accounts don’t match your precious Russian webpage info? Up to you Flogger. You are the one trying to prove that MM7074 was shot down in southern Iraq by a MiG!
Flogger wrote:
If i am not wrong Chaffando means use chaff flare counter measures so why you need that for AAA? of course it is for the radar but seems more for a missile”
Flogger you make being wrong into an art! Chaffando means that the Tornado was employing chaff. If MM7074 was being locked up by an ZSU-23-4 or a Roland then the aircrew would be employing chaff. Only you in Floggerland can turn it into flares against an AAM!
Very sad.
4 crew – Lynx or Puma?
Lynx 7 from 847 Naval Air Squadron.
Has anybody evidences of North-Korean Su-7s ?
Or is it just rumour ?
One point that always seems to raise its head when the North Korean Air Order of Battle is discussed is the status of Su-7 Fitter A. North Korea was supplied with and still had the Su-7 Fitter A operational (as of 2001) at Koksan (operated alongside MiG-21s). US aircrew stationed in S. Korea were still briefed on the North Korean’s use of the Su-7 Fitter. Nearly ten years ago documentation was declassified resulting in a website being dedicated to the work of USAF Security Service Korean Linguists and aircrew. These were the guys and girls who monitored and intercepted the North Korean military on a daily basis and Su-7 were noted on the website. The website link is now dead. Photographs of North Korean Su-7s are rarer than hen’s teeth!
Flogger wrote:
“claims that the MiG-23 shot down an Italian Panavia Tornado the first night of the war in the region near Bagdad and that according to Iraqi reports also they claimed a USAF F-16 shot down by a MiG-23 even despite six MiG-23 were destroyed by USAF F-15s, this is a better combat record than that of the Mirage F1 in GWI which achieved no kill”
And how did those claims originate? A combination from Ukrainian and Russian magazine articles. Basically stories and claims evolved from those sources. Not exactly reliable information. Created by individuals like yourself who dream of air-to-air kills from their beloved MiG-23 and the like. A bit of rumour, a bit of spin and we have a AAA/SAM kill turned into a MiG kill.
This was the story put out at the time in relation to Yugoslav pilots:
“Lt.Col. Gvozden Djukic: “Suddenly I saw a dot of light in the sky, and I headed by aircraft towards it. I realized that I was doing a head-on attack. The first missile I fired against it struck it in that head-on course.”
Few hours later Gvozden Djukic (and the whole world) knew due to the TV coverage that his victim had been one of the -until that time- considered invincible stealth fighters F-117A Nighthawks. After that it was clear that the stealth fighter was neither invisible nor immune to the helmet-mounted gunsight of the MiG-29 and their missiles R-73 Archer .”
Remember that one Flogger? You yourself actually believed that Gvozden Djukic was a 204 Fighter Regiment pilot who shot down an F-117 and was awarded a medal by Milosevic.
The same goes for those Russian and Ukrainian claims. Where exactly did they originate from. How much spin was put on them? They even claim a Tornado shot down near Baghdad that wasn’t even operating near there!
The same happened with Istoriya Aviatsii magazine after Allied Force in 1999.
They presented gun-camera footage claiming to show a Yugoslav MiG-29 shooting down an F-15 Eagle and a nice little story to go with it.
The image was simply lifted from a Salamader Books Ltd producton by Mike Spick. The image depicts gun-camera footage
from a USAF F-5E vs USAF F-15A DACT sortie. The book dates from 1983.
Flogger, do some research. How many of those Russian publications are still peddling stories of Yugoslav pilot tales as released to the Yugoslav public back in the early days of Allied Force?
Istoriya Aviatsii ripped off image attached. I wonder how many of the magazines readers still believe this to be genuine Yugoslav MiG-29 footage?
Flogger wrote:
“Hehehehe
TEEJ
Yes very reliable excuses for what Freytag said, So NATO did send a complete idiot for a press release? hehehehehe you are excusing an unexcusable mistake you are denying a simple fact there was no mistake they did know they lost the F-16 to Serbian fire but simply they waited to say the best account fitting the circumstances, yes that mistake was intentional”
So I return after a week and you are still peddling your conspiracy and cover up theory. Still not good enough Flogger. How do you think the 555th were going to cover up the loss of the CO’ bird. You do realise that this F-16 was the specially marked CG?
Flogger wrote:
“Same is the Harrier, who will prove it was an accident or not? if the wreckage did not fall in Serbian territory, yes TEEJ those mistakes were simply deliberated attempts to gain time for the best official version.”
Still peddling the conspiracy theory. So where is the announcement of the accident to cover up the loss of an airframe in combat? Simple stuff that only in your world makes sense. Sorry Flogger, but your “everything can be covered up” disclaimer doesn’t wash. Please provide me with a list of Harrier GR.7s lost post Allied Force. Over to you. No more Hehehe’s. It’s up to you to start providing some info. So are you saying that a Harrier GR.7 crash was invented in the UK to cover up a loss of a GR.7 in the Balkans. You really have to make yourself understandble. It is hard enough trying to decipher your mindset as it is.
Flogger world. Harrier GR.7 combat-jettisoned fuel tank found in Serbia. Flogger world – must have been shot down.
Flogger world. Tornado GR.1 combat-jettisoned fuel tank found in Serbia. Flogger world – must have been shot down.
The above is simply a stunning example of your naivety. Please inform me and this thread again of your story of “bullet holes”.
Flogger wrote:
“according to you the F-16`s radar warning recievers did not work or do not work to alert about threats such as SAMs eh?”
What are you babbling about now? Did you actually listen to the audio? Flogger, you really need to stop persistently living in a fantasy world. Wasn’t it recently that you were pretending to be a thirteen year old. You haven’t got out of the mindset yet. Your naivety is still firmly that of a thirteen year olds.
You believe in the ’38’. You stated that “NATO has listed many of those as accidents”. Again you have still not provided me or this thread with the details of those accidents. You are informing us that ’38’ manned aircraft are missing from the inventories. Again no more hehehehe’s and cover-up disclaimers. They simply don’t wash!
Flogger wrote:
“The fact is a SA-7 shot down a AH-64D on January 16 2006”
And this is fact? Flogger the insurgents use many different MANPADs. An SA-7 to the media is a standard disclaimer the same way as they believe every Russian fighter aircraft is a MiG. Just because a Russian webpage says that an SA-7 specifically downed the AH-64 then you believe it?
So maybe according to the world of Flogger “The fact is a SA-7 shot down a AH-64D on January 16 2006”
You even have the audacity to declare
“here is a list of Helicopter shot down”
So in the world according to Flogger every single one of those helos listed has been “shot down”. Did you actually read the list? Very basic stuff mate!
What will you be providing as proof? Some hee hee hee’s and a disclaimer that “everything can be covered up?”
1 x Italian GR1 Tornado downed Capt Maurizio Cocciolone
– Capt Mario Bichirloni
– on an air interdiction mission in Southern Iraq
From you own web page, they say the shot down the aircraft in Southern Iraq
Flogger,
Yet again no research. Italy doesn’t operate any Tornado with the designation GR.1. This is very basic stuff. Catch a grip!
Flogger you posted the following:
“The question is Russian sources and the military are specially interested in the usage of any Soviet/Russian weapon, the AH-64 downed on the previous picture is thought of have been shot down by a SA-7 SAM here is the linkApache shot down by a SA-7”
You linked it to this website:
http://www.inforos.ru/?id=10601
Your specific quote:
“the AH-64 downed on the previous picture is thought of have been shot down by a SA-7 SAM”
Now where did you get the information from? Directly from the Russian website. You did no research on the image and were quite content to pass it off as the actual image from 2006.
Of course the images are of two different crashes. The point is that you were quite content to pass off the image as coming from 2006.
Sorry Flogger your ‘so what dance’ doesn’t wash with me and probably many others following the thread.
That is a different AH-64 look at this picture from http://www.afa.org
Air force Magazine AH-64 crash 2003
Duh Flogger. Please switch on. Most of AFM can recognise this image that you are promoting from 2006. This is very simple stuff! So much for the accuracy of those Russian websites that you are constantly promoting as the truth. This is yet another stunning example of your naivety.
http://www.inforos.ru/?id=10601
The images of that Apache that crashed due to brown out were from 2003!
Do some simple research on AFM using the search engine. Caught out again Flogger! Will you be contacting the Russian website webmaster to correct his error? Ask him why he/she is using an image from 2003 to promote claims of an Apache shot down in 2006?
very embarrassing for you Flogger, but click on the following link from 2003. On page 2 you will see the image of the Apache that crashed due to brownout.
Page 1
http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=11206
Page 2
http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=11206&page=2&pp=30
You’ll have to do very much better than this Flogger!
Image insert is from the 2003 thread.