The only audio that I could find is included in the flight sim re-enactment. As you stated a lot of the original audio links are now dead. You can always try contacting the You Tube member to see if he still has the audio?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UUJB7hjlv4M
The two MiG-29s shot down on 26th March carried R-27 and R-73s. Do a google image search for ‘mig-29 bosnia’ for images of the wrecks and missiles.
TJ
Link to Typhoon image in Italy. It shows four Paveway, two ASRAAM and 1 AMRAAM carried along with external tanks and Litening pod.
http://www.abload.de/img/ellamy-906-110525-01725f2o.jpg
TJ
My main task now is to clean my sensor and can only thank Teej for pointing this out but still think and will repeat can anyone repeat the same resulting photo as I have done using a dirty sensor or catching some sun flare to repeat the image if its so easily understood how it was explained to me,it must thus be easy to repeat.:):eek::D:)
No problem. Thanks for the reply. All you need it something to fly between the camera and the subject that you are focused on in the sky. In your case you shot at 1/500th shutter speed which is more than ample to freeze the subject even though it might be out of focus. It could be anything, insect, bird, blossom, flying plant seed carried on the wind, etc. All it has to do is pass between your lens and the subject. If it reflects light then it can add to the confusion when captured in that moment of time.
It is more readily caught with video cameras. Individuals attempt to pass them off as ‘orbs’ ‘rods’ etc. Quite staggering how people can get carried away into the world of fantasy. For example this chap in Canada who films under a busy upper air route in Canada. He believes he is filming fake planes and their interaction with ‘ufo’s’. He simply can’t comprehend that his optics can be affected by atmospheric distortion, light reflection,heat haze, etc and is going to play a huge part in the resulting image. Consequently a distinctive airline livery or aircraft distorted by such factors is passed off as something out of the ordinary. Add to the fact that he interprets anything that passes through the cameras field of view as interacting with the aircraft even though it might only be a few hundred feet above him.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNQz4Rvkkx4
His You Tube account.
http://www.youtube.com/user/FakePlane
Other examples where people haven’t got a clue or attempt to decieve people on their YT Channels.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9i87qTGdOtQ
‘Rods’ and a Tupolev that he can’t identify or has any knowledge of.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GT0_woMSty0
TJ
My main task now is to clean my sensor and can only thank Teej for pointing this out but still think and will repeat can anyone repeat the same resulting photo as I have done using a dirty sensor or catching some sun flare to repeat the image if its so easily understood how it was explained to me,it must thus be easy to repeat.:):eek::D:)
No problem. Thanks for the reply. All you need it something to fly between the camera and the subject that you are focused on in the sky. In your case you shot at 1/500th shutter speed which is more than ample to freeze the subject even though it might be out of focus. It could be anything, insect, bird, blossom, flying plant seed carried on the wind, etc. All it has to do is pass between your lens and the subject. If it reflects light then it can add to the confusion when captured in that moment of time.
It is more readily caught with video cameras. Individuals attempt to pass them off as ‘orbs’ ‘rods’ etc. Quite staggering how people can get carried away into the world of fantasy. For example this chap in Canada who films under a busy upper air route in Canada. He believes he is filming fake planes and their interaction with ‘ufo’s’. He simply can’t comprehend that his optics can be affected by atmospheric distortion, light reflection,heat haze, etc and is going to play a huge part in the resulting image. Consequently a distinctive airline livery or aircraft distorted by such factors is passed off as something out of the ordinary. Add to the fact that he interprets anything that passes through the cameras field of view as interacting with the aircraft even though it might only be a few hundred feet above him.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNQz4Rvkkx4
His You Tube account.
http://www.youtube.com/user/FakePlane
Other examples where people haven’t got a clue or attempt to decieve people on their YT Channels.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9i87qTGdOtQ
‘Rods’ and a Tupolev that he can’t identify or has any knowledge of.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GT0_woMSty0
TJ
PMN, I believe, is a photographic screener on one of the aircraft image databases? In his time as a screener he must have seen all variations of photographic anomalies?
Your sensor is very dirty as you can seen from the version of your image that I have attached. All I did was add a background layer, equalise it and drop the brightness. The result is that all the dust spots, etc are highlighted. With that amount of dirt in your camera all sorts can be going on between shutter activations. Particles can be attracted to the low pass filter or be expelled. Dust on the low pass filter is normally a lot darker, but it doesn’t help presenting such an image when your camera has that level of dirt.
As already suggested it could also anything passing between your lens and the subject? All it takes is something to pass in front of your lens that is not at the focus point and subsequently reflects the light. The result is the same as the people who present the ‘orb’ images when they use flash photography at night or low light.
TJ
PMN, I believe, is a photographic screener on one of the aircraft image databases? In his time as a screener he must have seen all variations of photographic anomalies?
Your sensor is very dirty as you can seen from the version of your image that I have attached. All I did was add a background layer, equalise it and drop the brightness. The result is that all the dust spots, etc are highlighted. With that amount of dirt in your camera all sorts can be going on between shutter activations. Particles can be attracted to the low pass filter or be expelled. Dust on the low pass filter is normally a lot darker, but it doesn’t help presenting such an image when your camera has that level of dirt.
As already suggested it could also anything passing between your lens and the subject? All it takes is something to pass in front of your lens that is not at the focus point and subsequently reflects the light. The result is the same as the people who present the ‘orb’ images when they use flash photography at night or low light.
TJ
They left the runway intact. It’ll be interesting to see how long before it’s back in use.
It appears to be the policy to leave the runways intact and suppress the air units? Misrata is also joint civil so technically civilian infrastructure. No point in tearing up the runways when they will be required by the Libyans when Gaddafi is gone.
TJ
Video of Misrata airport – abandoned and destroyed aircraft.
http://english.aljazeera.net/video/middleeast/2011/05/2011527174513216563.html
TJ
RAF Typhoon takes off for Tiji with four Enhanced Paveway II 1000lb bombs
Image at following link.
http://www.raf.mod.uk/rafcms/mediafiles/BD108788_5056_A318_A85D3A95C0554B60.jpg
http://www.raf.mod.uk/news/archive/1000lb-bombs-26052011
Video
http://www.raf.mod.uk/rafcms/mediafiles/BE22E3DC_5056_A318_A8EBDB9A4417B4A7.wmv
http://www.raf.mod.uk/news/Libya-OpELLAMY.cfm
TJ
Possibly the RAF have just discovered the downsid to choosing nagging female voice for the incockpit audio feedback?
This response to the nagging female voice always makes me laugh. At 03:47 “Not now love!”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APiiKsH0dR4
TJ

DSC_0030-TUCANO by llihmot, on Flickr

DSC_0050-TUCANO by llihmot, on Flickr

DSC_0033-BREITLING by llihmot, on Flickr

DSC_0010-BREITLING by llihmot, on Flickr

DSC_0265-VANS-AF-FLY2HELP by llihmot, on Flickr

DSC_0165-YAK by llihmot, on Flickr

DSC_0169-YAK by llihmot, on Flickr

DSC_0386-BUCHON by llihmot, on Flickr

DSC_0195-SABRE by llihmot, on Flickr

DSC_0086-SEA-FURY by llihmot, on Flickr

DSC_0067-SEA-FURY by llihmot, on Flickr

DSC_0327-HURRICANE by llihmot, on Flickr

DSC_0344-LYNX by llihmot, on Flickr

DSC_0406-LYNX by llihmot, on Flickr
Thanks for looking.
Camera Nikon D2x. Lens Nikon Nikkor 300mm f/2.8 VR on and off with Nikon 1.7x teleconverter.
No photography comments. Thanks.
TJ
Pakistan has returned the helicopter wreckage from the Bin Laden operation.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-13531607
“The wreckage of the helicopter destroyed in the Bin Laden operation was returned over the weekend and is now back in the United States,” said Pentagon spokesman Col Dave Lapan.
TJ
No problem.
Some links to images of the vessels after the bombing.
http://www.armyrecognition.com/images/stories/news/2011/may/Destroyed_Combattante_2.jpg
http://www.armyrecognition.com/images/stories/news/2011/may/Destroyed_Combattante_2_2.jpg
TJ
Thanks very much for the comments. I took up aircraft photography as a serious hobby when I retired from the RAF.
TJ
Thanks also, TEEJ. Interesting website he has there, very nice images he’s taken. I’ll give him a buzz soon, ta very much. 😉
No problem. Kev is Mr Coningsby!
RAF Coningsby is busy at the moment with air to ground training. 29 Squadron Typhoon T.3 returning to Coningsby on Thursday 19th May after dropping one inert Paveway of four carried. The same Typhoon was noted in the afternoon taking off with the three Paveways.
TJ