dark light

TEEJ

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 631 through 645 (of 2,134 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Serbian AF Mig 29 shootdown 1999 #2326293
    TEEJ
    Participant

    The only audio that I could find is included in the flight sim re-enactment. As you stated a lot of the original audio links are now dead. You can always try contacting the You Tube member to see if he still has the audio?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UUJB7hjlv4M

    The two MiG-29s shot down on 26th March carried R-27 and R-73s. Do a google image search for ‘mig-29 bosnia’ for images of the wrecks and missiles.

    TJ

    in reply to: Air Ops Over Libya (Part Deux) #2327245
    TEEJ
    Participant

    Link to Typhoon image in Italy. It shows four Paveway, two ASRAAM and 1 AMRAAM carried along with external tanks and Litening pod.

    http://www.abload.de/img/ellamy-906-110525-01725f2o.jpg

    TJ

    in reply to: General Discussion #322278
    TEEJ
    Participant

    My main task now is to clean my sensor and can only thank Teej for pointing this out but still think and will repeat can anyone repeat the same resulting photo as I have done using a dirty sensor or catching some sun flare to repeat the image if its so easily understood how it was explained to me,it must thus be easy to repeat.:):eek::D:)

    No problem. Thanks for the reply. All you need it something to fly between the camera and the subject that you are focused on in the sky. In your case you shot at 1/500th shutter speed which is more than ample to freeze the subject even though it might be out of focus. It could be anything, insect, bird, blossom, flying plant seed carried on the wind, etc. All it has to do is pass between your lens and the subject. If it reflects light then it can add to the confusion when captured in that moment of time.

    It is more readily caught with video cameras. Individuals attempt to pass them off as ‘orbs’ ‘rods’ etc. Quite staggering how people can get carried away into the world of fantasy. For example this chap in Canada who films under a busy upper air route in Canada. He believes he is filming fake planes and their interaction with ‘ufo’s’. He simply can’t comprehend that his optics can be affected by atmospheric distortion, light reflection,heat haze, etc and is going to play a huge part in the resulting image. Consequently a distinctive airline livery or aircraft distorted by such factors is passed off as something out of the ordinary. Add to the fact that he interprets anything that passes through the cameras field of view as interacting with the aircraft even though it might only be a few hundred feet above him.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNQz4Rvkkx4

    His You Tube account.

    http://www.youtube.com/user/FakePlane

    Other examples where people haven’t got a clue or attempt to decieve people on their YT Channels.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9i87qTGdOtQ

    ‘Rods’ and a Tupolev that he can’t identify or has any knowledge of.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GT0_woMSty0

    TJ

    in reply to: UFO or not #1861102
    TEEJ
    Participant

    My main task now is to clean my sensor and can only thank Teej for pointing this out but still think and will repeat can anyone repeat the same resulting photo as I have done using a dirty sensor or catching some sun flare to repeat the image if its so easily understood how it was explained to me,it must thus be easy to repeat.:):eek::D:)

    No problem. Thanks for the reply. All you need it something to fly between the camera and the subject that you are focused on in the sky. In your case you shot at 1/500th shutter speed which is more than ample to freeze the subject even though it might be out of focus. It could be anything, insect, bird, blossom, flying plant seed carried on the wind, etc. All it has to do is pass between your lens and the subject. If it reflects light then it can add to the confusion when captured in that moment of time.

    It is more readily caught with video cameras. Individuals attempt to pass them off as ‘orbs’ ‘rods’ etc. Quite staggering how people can get carried away into the world of fantasy. For example this chap in Canada who films under a busy upper air route in Canada. He believes he is filming fake planes and their interaction with ‘ufo’s’. He simply can’t comprehend that his optics can be affected by atmospheric distortion, light reflection,heat haze, etc and is going to play a huge part in the resulting image. Consequently a distinctive airline livery or aircraft distorted by such factors is passed off as something out of the ordinary. Add to the fact that he interprets anything that passes through the cameras field of view as interacting with the aircraft even though it might only be a few hundred feet above him.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNQz4Rvkkx4

    His You Tube account.

    http://www.youtube.com/user/FakePlane

    Other examples where people haven’t got a clue or attempt to decieve people on their YT Channels.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9i87qTGdOtQ

    ‘Rods’ and a Tupolev that he can’t identify or has any knowledge of.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GT0_woMSty0

    TJ

    in reply to: General Discussion #322366
    TEEJ
    Participant

    PMN, I believe, is a photographic screener on one of the aircraft image databases? In his time as a screener he must have seen all variations of photographic anomalies?

    Your sensor is very dirty as you can seen from the version of your image that I have attached. All I did was add a background layer, equalise it and drop the brightness. The result is that all the dust spots, etc are highlighted. With that amount of dirt in your camera all sorts can be going on between shutter activations. Particles can be attracted to the low pass filter or be expelled. Dust on the low pass filter is normally a lot darker, but it doesn’t help presenting such an image when your camera has that level of dirt.

    As already suggested it could also anything passing between your lens and the subject? All it takes is something to pass in front of your lens that is not at the focus point and subsequently reflects the light. The result is the same as the people who present the ‘orb’ images when they use flash photography at night or low light.

    TJ

    in reply to: UFO or not #1861179
    TEEJ
    Participant

    PMN, I believe, is a photographic screener on one of the aircraft image databases? In his time as a screener he must have seen all variations of photographic anomalies?

    Your sensor is very dirty as you can seen from the version of your image that I have attached. All I did was add a background layer, equalise it and drop the brightness. The result is that all the dust spots, etc are highlighted. With that amount of dirt in your camera all sorts can be going on between shutter activations. Particles can be attracted to the low pass filter or be expelled. Dust on the low pass filter is normally a lot darker, but it doesn’t help presenting such an image when your camera has that level of dirt.

    As already suggested it could also anything passing between your lens and the subject? All it takes is something to pass in front of your lens that is not at the focus point and subsequently reflects the light. The result is the same as the people who present the ‘orb’ images when they use flash photography at night or low light.

    TJ

    in reply to: Air Ops Over Libya (Part Deux) #2330877
    TEEJ
    Participant

    They left the runway intact. It’ll be interesting to see how long before it’s back in use.

    It appears to be the policy to leave the runways intact and suppress the air units? Misrata is also joint civil so technically civilian infrastructure. No point in tearing up the runways when they will be required by the Libyans when Gaddafi is gone.

    TJ

    in reply to: Air Ops Over Libya (Part Deux) #2331081
    TEEJ
    Participant

    Video of Misrata airport – abandoned and destroyed aircraft.

    http://english.aljazeera.net/video/middleeast/2011/05/2011527174513216563.html

    TJ

    in reply to: Air Ops Over Libya (Part Deux) #2332557
    TEEJ
    Participant
    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon News & Discussions Thread IV #2334164
    TEEJ
    Participant

    Possibly the RAF have just discovered the downsid to choosing nagging female voice for the incockpit audio feedback?

    This response to the nagging female voice always makes me laugh. At 03:47 “Not now love!”

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APiiKsH0dR4

    TJ

    in reply to: Duxford Spring Airshow – 22nd May 2011 #516305
    TEEJ
    Participant

    http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5062/5758512582_749f71cee4_o.jpg
    DSC_0030-TUCANO by llihmot, on Flickr

    http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5183/5758512578_c7912288b4_o.jpg
    DSC_0050-TUCANO by llihmot, on Flickr

    http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3209/5758503828_539a646d24_o.jpg
    DSC_0033-BREITLING by llihmot, on Flickr

    http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1393/5758503822_0af5213de7_o.jpg
    DSC_0010-BREITLING by llihmot, on Flickr

    http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2637/5758503814_1c657d359d_o.jpg
    DSC_0265-VANS-AF-FLY2HELP by llihmot, on Flickr

    http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3160/5758503804_014159ffda_o.jpg
    DSC_0165-YAK by llihmot, on Flickr

    http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5268/5758503790_6cc417bfec_o.jpg
    DSC_0169-YAK by llihmot, on Flickr

    http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5187/5758503784_07e60966be_o.jpg
    DSC_0386-BUCHON by llihmot, on Flickr

    http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3144/5757951513_4831a6bc93_o.jpg
    DSC_0195-SABRE by llihmot, on Flickr

    http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3335/5757951509_6740eac1ae_o.jpg
    DSC_0086-SEA-FURY by llihmot, on Flickr

    http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3057/5757951495_7aae707ef4_o.jpg
    DSC_0067-SEA-FURY by llihmot, on Flickr

    http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5103/5757951491_2d5c310def_o.jpg
    DSC_0327-HURRICANE by llihmot, on Flickr

    http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5021/5757951481_28bbe6d94c_o.jpg
    DSC_0344-LYNX by llihmot, on Flickr

    http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5187/5757951475_70939be964_o.jpg
    DSC_0406-LYNX by llihmot, on Flickr

    Thanks for looking.

    Camera Nikon D2x. Lens Nikon Nikkor 300mm f/2.8 VR on and off with Nikon 1.7x teleconverter.

    No photography comments. Thanks.

    TJ

    in reply to: Bin Laden Raid: Stealth Helicopter Mods? #2334919
    TEEJ
    Participant

    Pakistan has returned the helicopter wreckage from the Bin Laden operation.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-13531607

    “The wreckage of the helicopter destroyed in the Bin Laden operation was returned over the weekend and is now back in the United States,” said Pentagon spokesman Col Dave Lapan.

    TJ

    in reply to: Air Ops Over Libya (Part Deux) #2337212
    TEEJ
    Participant
    in reply to: RAF aircraft photos #2337504
    TEEJ
    Participant

    Thanks very much for the comments. I took up aircraft photography as a serious hobby when I retired from the RAF.

    TJ

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon News & Discussions Thread IV #2337534
    TEEJ
    Participant

    Thanks also, TEEJ. Interesting website he has there, very nice images he’s taken. I’ll give him a buzz soon, ta very much. 😉

    No problem. Kev is Mr Coningsby!

    RAF Coningsby is busy at the moment with air to ground training. 29 Squadron Typhoon T.3 returning to Coningsby on Thursday 19th May after dropping one inert Paveway of four carried. The same Typhoon was noted in the afternoon taking off with the three Paveways.

    http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2488/5740962005_5cddc67d46_o.jpg

    TJ

Viewing 15 posts - 631 through 645 (of 2,134 total)