dark light

Grey Area

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 12,725 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: BBC Global warming deceit #1844943
    Grey Area
    Participant

    Does any daily paper, broadsheet or otherwise, profess objectivity?

    Would anyone in their right mind believe them if they did? :diablo:

    in reply to: The mole's role is a hole #1844944
    Grey Area
    Participant

    You won’t find me arguing with the Mods, that’s for sure.

    This lot know which cupboard the skeletons are in. :diablo:

    in reply to: General Discussion #246084
    Grey Area
    Participant

    You won’t find me arguing with the Mods, that’s for sure.

    This lot know which cupboard the skeletons are in. :diablo:

    in reply to: General Discussion #246313
    Grey Area
    Participant

    I think it’s fair to say that the Daily Telegraph seldom dodges a chance to have a dig at the BBC, and there is a clear and long-standing editorial slant on issues like climate change. Nothing wrong with that in itself, of course, but let’s not kid ourselves about objectivity.

    Stuff like this only serves to polarise (no pun intended) already entrenched opinions, contributing to a smokescreen of tub-thumping and statistic mining about the causes of climate change that hides the inaction of governments in mitigating the effects.

    in reply to: BBC Global warming deceit #1845140
    Grey Area
    Participant

    I think it’s fair to say that the Daily Telegraph seldom dodges a chance to have a dig at the BBC, and there is a clear and long-standing editorial slant on issues like climate change. Nothing wrong with that in itself, of course, but let’s not kid ourselves about objectivity.

    Stuff like this only serves to polarise (no pun intended) already entrenched opinions, contributing to a smokescreen of tub-thumping and statistic mining about the causes of climate change that hides the inaction of governments in mitigating the effects.

    in reply to: The mole's role is a hole #1845367
    Grey Area
    Participant

    Re 36

    Few, understand your arguments – including you.

    Yes, John, I can see where you might have difficulty with ideas that challenge your monochrome certainties.

    My apologies, and I’ll try to keep it more simple for you in the future.

    in reply to: General Discussion #246603
    Grey Area
    Participant

    Re 36

    Few, understand your arguments – including you.

    Yes, John, I can see where you might have difficulty with ideas that challenge your monochrome certainties.

    My apologies, and I’ll try to keep it more simple for you in the future.

    in reply to: General Discussion #246753
    Grey Area
    Participant

    What a lot of fuss about nothing.

    in reply to: The mole's role is a hole #1845531
    Grey Area
    Participant

    What a lot of fuss about nothing.

    in reply to: The mole's role is a hole #1845627
    Grey Area
    Participant

    If I have understood the spat between GA and JG correctly the assertion is that many of man’s greatest achievements have come from the ideas and genius of special individuals. But that that cannot be because no individual works in isolation.

    To be honest, I don’t think you have understood my argument properly – my fault, I’m sure.

    No-one in their right mind could possibly deny the existence of individual genius and I’ve not seen anyone here do so.

    What I am saying is that the inspired ideas of these gifted individuals nevertheless relied on the mundane work of others to bring them to fruition.

    For example, it was Michelangelo’s unique genius that first visualised his statue of David, but that vision would have remained inside his head and been unknown to the world had someone not quarried the marble and someone else not made the tools that Michelangelo used to create his masterpiece. I’m sure he found the availablility of marble and suitable tools intensely relevant at that time.

    No man is an island, and all that. 🙂

    in reply to: General Discussion #246850
    Grey Area
    Participant

    If I have understood the spat between GA and JG correctly the assertion is that many of man’s greatest achievements have come from the ideas and genius of special individuals. But that that cannot be because no individual works in isolation.

    To be honest, I don’t think you have understood my argument properly – my fault, I’m sure.

    No-one in their right mind could possibly deny the existence of individual genius and I’ve not seen anyone here do so.

    What I am saying is that the inspired ideas of these gifted individuals nevertheless relied on the mundane work of others to bring them to fruition.

    For example, it was Michelangelo’s unique genius that first visualised his statue of David, but that vision would have remained inside his head and been unknown to the world had someone not quarried the marble and someone else not made the tools that Michelangelo used to create his masterpiece. I’m sure he found the availablility of marble and suitable tools intensely relevant at that time.

    No man is an island, and all that. 🙂

    in reply to: General Discussion #246853
    Grey Area
    Participant

    These things are always subjective but I found it to be rather like a slightly lighter Bishops Finger, if that helps at all.

    in reply to: Seen today, 3 Lancaster Bombers in V formation #1845632
    Grey Area
    Participant

    These things are always subjective but I found it to be rather like a slightly lighter Bishops Finger, if that helps at all.

    in reply to: The mole's role is a hole #1845851
    Grey Area
    Participant

    Fer cryin’ out loud, how infantile can you get?

    I’m confident you’ll show us before too long, John.

    in reply to: General Discussion #247033
    Grey Area
    Participant

    Fer cryin’ out loud, how infantile can you get?

    I’m confident you’ll show us before too long, John.

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 12,725 total)