Roll the Day on when the BEEB is Pay to View ! and I don’t have to pay my £10 a month TelevisionTax.
You are Rupert Murdoch, and I claim my £50. :diablo:
Roll the Day on when the BEEB is Pay to View ! and I don’t have to pay my £10 a month TelevisionTax.
You are Rupert Murdoch, and I claim my £50. :diablo:
To my mind, the thing that was so extraordinary about the 777 was the flawless service entry. The very high reliability out of the gate was very impressive…..remember at the time some of her competitors were still poo-pooing ETOPS to the extent that some of them were still building tri and quad engined airplanes. Those airplanes have languished in recent years compared to their twin engined brethren.
So if Boeing can introduce revolutionary structures and systems on the 787 with the same level of reliability they attained with the 777, to achieve unparalled economy, then it really will be a new day in aviation. All those building aluminum airplanes will be left trying to catch up. I hope for their sake they have used the 2+ year delay to further improve the airplane.
You’re quite right, of course, but it’s a very big “if”. The B777 is quite some act to follow and was, for all it’s many sterling qualities, a low-risk project in terms of design and technology.
I was being facetious, hence the smilies. Just making sure you’re paying attention. :diablo:
Oh, I’m always paying attention! 😎
Nice plane, but it still looks like a “sexed-up” B777 to me.
I didn’t hear any objections to the same comments made with the A380 :p :diablo:
I don’t remember anyone actually making such outlandishly hyperbolic comments about the A380.
But perhaps you will be able to refresh my memory?
The future began today……aviation has been reborn……everything is new.
Oh, that’s over the top to a silly degree.
It’s a very nice-looking aeroplane doing what it was designed to do, and apparently doing it very well. It’s not the Second Coming. :rolleyes:
Moderatorial Mutterings
Can we agree to keep it as a ‘commercial aviation’ discussion for at least a few days Lance ? I think it’ worth it… ?
So long as it remains relevant to the immediate topic.
If it broadens out into general political issues and/or descends into Gordon/Dave bashing – over to General Discussion it goes.
Fair enough?
GA
Moderator Message
Enough with the politics, already!
This is a Commercial Aviation forum. General Discussion is over here.
Thanks,
GA
Bah, Sir!
Humbug, Sir!
:diablo:
Bah, Sir!
Humbug, Sir!
:diablo:
They’ve been a fairly common sight at LTN for quite a long time now.
Agreed. Now what I would like to know is what is the probability of there being a latent error in a line of software code in one of the zillions of algorithms in an entirely computer controlled aircraft? I think this has happened before. And with 600 souls on board, a rogue comma could cause a lot of misery.
I don’t think you quite understand the concept of multiple-redundant systems, or the battery of extensive testing and simulation that has to be satisfied before code is cleared for live service. It’s not just some bloke sitting there with a PC, you know!
After all, there is also a probability of a chunk of an aircraft’s wing being torn off by a passing meteorite. Let’s ground every aircraft in the world just to be on the safe side, shall we?
…and those are his footprints, right there.
…and those are his footprints, right there.
Ah well, you can only hear that so many times…. :p