dark light

Grey Area

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 10,156 through 10,170 (of 12,725 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: A380 : first flight (Merged) #718734
    Grey Area
    Participant

    I’ll bet it was taken with a big lens – 400-500mm.

    The “foreshortening” effect of large lenses would make the helicopter appear to be much closer to the tail of the A380 than it actually was.

    in reply to: This afternoon at Manchester #675109
    Grey Area
    Participant

    I know the feeling, T5.

    In between taking these pictures, I was chatting away to another spotter.

    I was still chatting away while the CRJ G-ELNX taxied slowly past, still wearing the full Ansett livery! :(:(:(

    in reply to: This afternoon at Manchester #718742
    Grey Area
    Participant

    I know the feeling, T5.

    In between taking these pictures, I was chatting away to another spotter.

    I was still chatting away while the CRJ G-ELNX taxied slowly past, still wearing the full Ansett livery! :(:(:(

    in reply to: A380 : first flight (Merged) #675146
    Grey Area
    Participant

    I heard the landing gear struts were designed and built in Canada by BFGoodrich.

    Hmmm….

    This is from the BF Goodrich website: “The landing gear for the A380 will be designed and manufactured at the company’s facilities in Cleveland, Ohio, and Oakville, Ontario. Final assembly will be in Goodrich’s facilities next to the A380 assembly line in Toulouse, France.

    in reply to: A380 : first flight (Merged) #718767
    Grey Area
    Participant

    I heard the landing gear struts were designed and built in Canada by BFGoodrich.

    Hmmm….

    This is from the BF Goodrich website: “The landing gear for the A380 will be designed and manufactured at the company’s facilities in Cleveland, Ohio, and Oakville, Ontario. Final assembly will be in Goodrich’s facilities next to the A380 assembly line in Toulouse, France.

    in reply to: This afternoon at Manchester #675320
    Grey Area
    Participant

    Thanks, EK. 🙂

    in reply to: This afternoon at Manchester #718999
    Grey Area
    Participant

    Thanks, EK. 🙂

    in reply to: This afternoon at Manchester #675353
    Grey Area
    Participant

    What are them building works behind the Air France? Is it anything to do with the airport?

    Some say it’s a hotel, others say it’s more stands for aircraft. There isn’t any sign of structural work, so I’m leaning more towards the “new stands” theory. 🙂

    Not as good as mine!

    But much, much wetter…… 😀

    in reply to: This afternoon at Manchester #719023
    Grey Area
    Participant

    What are them building works behind the Air France? Is it anything to do with the airport?

    Some say it’s a hotel, others say it’s more stands for aircraft. There isn’t any sign of structural work, so I’m leaning more towards the “new stands” theory. 🙂

    Not as good as mine!

    But much, much wetter…… 😀

    in reply to: A380 : first flight (Merged) #675356
    Grey Area
    Participant

    Sorry, mate – my edit to include the TOW for today’s flight crossed with your last posting. 🙂

    in reply to: A380 : first flight (Merged) #719027
    Grey Area
    Participant

    Sorry, mate – my edit to include the TOW for today’s flight crossed with your last posting. 🙂

    in reply to: A380 : first flight (Merged) #675361
    Grey Area
    Participant

    According to some people – who shall remain nameless – it was supposed to be grossly overweight to the tune of many tonnes.

    In any case 6 hours fuel, a shedload of telemetry equipment and water ballast is nothing to be sneezed at weight-wise. The Trent 900s are de-rated at the moment, too.

    The TOW was 421T, apparently. How heavy is B747-400?

    Or is it different when it’s a Boeing? :rolleyes:

    in reply to: A380 : first flight (Merged) #719043
    Grey Area
    Participant

    According to some people – who shall remain nameless – it was supposed to be grossly overweight to the tune of many tonnes.

    In any case 6 hours fuel, a shedload of telemetry equipment and water ballast is nothing to be sneezed at weight-wise. The Trent 900s are de-rated at the moment, too.

    The TOW was 421T, apparently. How heavy is B747-400?

    Or is it different when it’s a Boeing? :rolleyes:

    in reply to: This afternoon at Manchester #675362
    Grey Area
    Participant

    I knew what he meant……… 😀

    in reply to: This afternoon at Manchester #719046
    Grey Area
    Participant

    I knew what he meant……… 😀

Viewing 15 posts - 10,156 through 10,170 (of 12,725 total)