……….. hello, danairboy. :rolleyes:
Nice to see something meeting with your approval for once.
It is you, isn’t it? 😉
……….. hello, danairboy. :rolleyes:
Nice to see something meeting with your approval for once.
It is you, isn’t it? 😉
I don’t think BA have much clout with them, to be frank.
If JFK wanted it, surely they would have made a bid for it or something?
Did they, so far as anyone is aware?
I don’t think BA have much clout with them, to be frank.
If JFK wanted it, surely they would have made a bid for it or something?
Did they, so far as anyone is aware?
Hopefully BA will be made aware of this and suitable measures will be taken?
Such as what, exactly?
“No C of A” means “ain’t gonna fly no more.”
Face it, guys. It’s gone, and it’s never coming back.
Ever.
Time to move on.
Hopefully BA will be made aware of this and suitable measures will be taken?
Such as what, exactly?
“No C of A” means “ain’t gonna fly no more.”
Face it, guys. It’s gone, and it’s never coming back.
Ever.
Time to move on.
None – G-VSSS and her “sister ship” G-VBEE both belong to Air Atlanta, even though they still wear the full Virgin scheme and operate Virgin flights from Manchester.
None – G-VSSS and her “sister ship” G-VBEE both belong to Air Atlanta, even though they still wear the full Virgin scheme and operate Virgin flights from Manchester.
I reckon it depends on whether or not they get rid of the “Buzz” 737-300s, myself.
If they keep them, I think we’ll be seeing them rather than -800s.
I reckon it depends on whether or not they get rid of the “Buzz” 737-300s, myself.
If they keep them, I think we’ll be seeing them rather than -800s.
You’re quite entitled to your opinion, Sandy……..
You’re quite entitled to your opinion, Sandy……..
True, but if the aircraft had been an attractive proposition to US airlines the ban wouldn’t have lasted even as long as it did.
The ban didn’t affect services to and from non-US destinations either, so why didn’t Asian and South American carriers order it for services to Europe, Australia and the like?
I still maintain that the aircraft was uneconomical in the 1970s and that this was what killed it.
True, but if the aircraft had been an attractive proposition to US airlines the ban wouldn’t have lasted even as long as it did.
The ban didn’t affect services to and from non-US destinations either, so why didn’t Asian and South American carriers order it for services to Europe, Australia and the like?
I still maintain that the aircraft was uneconomical in the 1970s and that this was what killed it.
The fact that you can present a Boeing press conference – the one you mentioned in your first posting on this thread – as a source of objective fact in this matter tells the rest of us all we need to know about how seriously we should take your subsequent postings on this issue. :rolleyes: