The runway at the US military refuelling and tactical base on the UK Indian Ocean island of Diego Garcia is expected to be returned to operational status this weekend after the Rockwell B-1B strategic bomber that made a wheels-up landing on Monday has been cleared by the island’s port heavy lift crane.
I think they are planning on using the SDB 2 fitted with a tri-mode seeker and set to air burst for the anti-swarming small craft role but I think I would rather have a naval aviation and ship based solution to this problem rather than rely on B-1B’s 😉
Hornet’s, Harrier’s and Seahawk’s armed with JCM missiles and APKWS rockets and ships with boxes of Netfires missiles on deck seem like a better idea for defence to me.
I think something based on the Flying Flapjack’s aerodynamics would make an excellent support aircraft doing the AEW, ASW/ASuW and COD roles on small V/STOL carriers.
I guess you could build something to match the Harrier’s performance, but I’m not sure if you could combine the aerodynamics of a supersonic fighter with the very low stall speed of the Flying Flapjack.
I would like to see a tanker/bomber enter service.
The V-bombers were almost tanker/bombers anyway and a new design could use off the shelf systems and equipment from a current airliner and the offensive and defensive systems from a current fighter/bomber in a new design airframe.
Let’s say you take the engines, electrics, hydraulics and undercarriage from a Airbus A320 and the radar, targeting pod, communications/navigation gear and the defensive aids sub system from a Eurofighter Typhoon and fit them in a Boeing Sonic Cruiser type airframe with a two-four man cockpit (with a toilet 😀 ) and a weapons bay for 12x Storm Shadow cruise missiles or the equivalent load of bombs or a fuel tank and probe and drogue refuelling system. AMRAAM, ASRAAM and ALARM missiles could be carried for self-defence too.
Basically this aircraft would do the same missions as a B-1B (high threat stand-off attack, low threat close air support) and buddy refuel it’s escorts 🙂
Here are some inspirational pics 😉
My next question then is, how does the aircraft fare on a stand alone basis, i.e. the user doesn’t have all the additional assets?
I think the F-35 would still do pretty well on it’s own, the pilot should have very good situational awareness from all the onboard defensive and offensive systems and I’m sure the latest auto-pilot and auto-throttle will put the aircraft in the right place at the right time.
F-35 technology http://www.jsf.mil/f35/f35_technology.htm
The latest model fighters have similar systems but the F-35 has the advantage of stealth so it can probably operate in higher threat environments more effectively than non-stealth fighters.
Who can tell me how many pylons under Rafale’s wing with picture proving?
😉
I think you might misunderstand me.
What I want to wxpress is the pylon between engine necelle like this picture in which I circled using red.
sferrin is right, those are the inboard cruise missile pylons and are just there for the photo.
Skydiver in record Channel flight http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3112095.stm
I hear that someone with one of these wing kits is planning to land without a parachute soon 😮
This bloke couldn’t find any pics of a F-100 with Shrikes either but it didn’t stop him making this model 😉 http://www.aircraftresourcecenter.com/Fea1/901-1000/Fea979_F-100_Bahr/fea979.htm
I’ve heared that Tomcat-21 project plan Super Tomcat would carry over 12 long-range A-A missile, I faintlly remember there is some pix showed mockup carry such many missiles. Who can show me those pix?
These test shapes for a new missile could be what you mean, they have appeared in a previous thread too http://parisairshow.free.fr/walkaround/f-14/page_01.htm
Super Tomcat 21 pics and info here http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/planes/q0132.shtml
Pics and info on the B-52 between engines Litening II targeting pod installation http://www.edwards.af.mil/archive/2003/2003-archive-b52_pod.html
Pic from http://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/b52/index.html#b527
The B-52 chaff rocket pod was AN/ALE-25 which was part of the Phase IV ECM modifications done to the G/H models in 1964/66. The pod was phased out in 1970. The Chaff rocket designation was ADR-8A, The chaff rocket fit is shown in the Aerofax Datafile on the BUFF (not the Detail and Scale one) which also showed the proposed self defence penetration fit with AMRAAM and Tacit Rainbow (offensive weapons fit being in the front half of the bomb bay).
Info and pics here http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/r-8.html
Well, thanks for your reply PhantomII and Would u tell me Have ever seen there are pylons being between B-52’s engine bay each side. I mean not between engine and airframe.
You can just make out the designator pod on the hardpoint between the engine pylons in this pic.
Jaguars strafing http://www.raf.mod.uk/news/ranges14.html
This kind of answered my own question of how a CH-47 fits into a C-17.
http://www.defenselink.mil/transformation/images/photos/2006-03/Hi-Res/060312-F-3488S-074.jpg
This is how the RAF does it 🙂 http://www.operations.mod.uk/veritas/img/veritas/45cdogp/c17load.jpg