dark light

Red Hunter

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 2,513 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: UK Defence Review Part I #2392857
    Red Hunter
    Participant

    True, although you have the thought that there is rather more communication and even cooperation between the Treasury and the spending departments than previously.

    in reply to: UK Defence Review Part I #2392873
    Red Hunter
    Participant

    I think you are right. The GP was published by the last government and my point was what I felt should be the case rather than what might be the case. We need a review of foreign policy and then a new GP to reflect that policy’s asprations.

    in reply to: General Discussion #346262
    Red Hunter
    Participant

    😀 Spontaneous chuckle from this poster.:D

    in reply to: What Made You Smile Today? (Part 2) #1916149
    Red Hunter
    Participant

    😀 Spontaneous chuckle from this poster.:D

    in reply to: UK Defence Review Part I #2393010
    Red Hunter
    Participant

    Unitl the Government clearly defines its foreign policy objectives over the next decade or two it cannot produce a new defence Green Paper. The two are inextricably linked – a fact which has escaped previous administrations.

    in reply to: General Discussion #346301
    Red Hunter
    Participant

    Well that’s just bl**dy marvellous, Blue. I am delighted for you – I’m sure you’ll drink his health tonight.;):D

    in reply to: What Made You Smile Today? (Part 2) #1916195
    Red Hunter
    Participant

    Well that’s just bl**dy marvellous, Blue. I am delighted for you – I’m sure you’ll drink his health tonight.;):D

    in reply to: How low can you go? #548629
    Red Hunter
    Participant

    Robmac – take it easy with the exclamation marks.;) I didn’t say it was dangerous – I have expressed no opinion on the matter at all. I did say that other posters have implied that it was dangerous.

    in reply to: How low can you go? #548653
    Red Hunter
    Participant

    Very much so but I don’t think it’s an ‘elf’n’safety problem here – it is the implication of bad or dangerous flying. Much more serious.

    in reply to: Duxford = about People & Planes… #548658
    Red Hunter
    Participant

    Unusual selection – very nice indeed. Thanks.

    in reply to: How low can you go? #548853
    Red Hunter
    Participant

    Is anyone here really qualified to make these sorts of judgements on the basis of a photograph alone and other, possibly, unreliable observations? There is no ulterior motive behind the question – I am merely seeking an objective answer.

    in reply to: General Discussion #346305
    Red Hunter
    Participant

    I can’t believe that no one has “smiled” on here for over 12 hours nor “sworn” for even longer……..:confused:

    in reply to: What Made You Smile Today? (Part 2) #1916201
    Red Hunter
    Participant

    I can’t believe that no one has “smiled” on here for over 12 hours nor “sworn” for even longer……..:confused:

    in reply to: Problems at Duxford. #548859
    Red Hunter
    Participant

    :D:D:D

    in reply to: General Discussion #346452
    Red Hunter
    Participant

    Aren’t Ninja’s turtles??:diablo:

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 2,513 total)