everyone twist their wings. from F22 to Cessena 172. 🙂
ideally you want to stall the inboards first like the old spitfire.
even if you stall, you want to retain the aileron effectiveness.
but, spanwise flow , and etc etc, makes the wing outer span stalls early usually .having a twisted wing means your tip aoa is at a lower angle relative to the inboard… lower aoa/lower loading/further away from stall. and if you stall ailerons (which are usually located at outer spans still have effectiveness)
having a wing leading edge twists, or actuated slats outboard is the same idea.
if one is venturing enough, you can move the ailerons to unload when aoa gets high enough. 😉
Only me can see through your misguiding to the others.
We all know what is the exact meaning of Twist here from Haavarla:cool:
You were playing him or you are not able to explain…….:D
Yes, perhaps no such long combat radius but could be superior on other items like roll rate, climb rate or turn rate?
No Stealthy Engine nozzles, No Single piece canopy. Boring.
Knowing rectangular nozzle only or focusing merely on single piece canopy are boring indeed!
I still have no idea about the initial climb rate of Tornado at sea level.
To 11000M less than 2 minutes didn’t give anything valuable.
In that computer videos the real height over ground is not shown. The “displayed” speeds showed a steep “climb” or an upward vector for that last ditch manouvers to force an overshoot or let him pass.
Are you saying that modular doesn’t match the true situation?
Single piece or not there is nothing more released.
Simply making sth large or thicker doesn’t mean anything important.
An amentia’s brain always stay in a fantasy to dream an area to be larger or sth is more thicker….
That altitude was not unusual that recovered right in time, if you watched video completely.
Hmm I have a rival now.
And could you tell me why the inlet was designed as a curved lip originally whereas Su-15 used similar extension either on lateral version?
Really? The post-stall maneuver done by Phantom II serviced in Vietnam air war for saving his life and got greater benefit of foes killing actually was performed not by refitted experimental F-4.
Yes there is.
Google “aeroelastic stability” and/or “aeroelastic divergence”.
Proof that you can deal with the afore mentioned aerelasticity issues throughout the life of the aircraft and in the event of impact damage to the leading edge.
Your so-called aerolasticity are well known, but it merely appears while entering transonic and supersonic flight, there is nothing to do with certain subsonic flight
SU-27 ferry range is about 3900km
What if there is no external DTs, how do you define so-called ferry range?
Well, why there is no others did post-stall at that era?
Umm.. well if you thought it about logically youd know why.
1) Most airliners have engines under the wings, a FSW will need to be stronger in all cases to hold the weight of engines.
There is no fundamental different structure between FSW and BSW.
2) A FSW airliner wont be able to park at ANY AIRPORT IN THE WORLD which uses an aero bridge…
I can’t see support to your oppinion
– questionable aerodynamic benefit over a well designed wing
– weight growth
– reduced wing internal volume for fuel
– certification
– uncertainties over structural life-span
No additional weight growth compare to Backward Swept Wing, if you understand their structure by sharpe.
No internal volume reduced by same reason above
What’s certification?
uncertainties? yes, but we need no supersonic flight up to now….
Weight of fuel T-50
Normal – 5000 kg
Maximum – 8700 kgPendant fuel tanks in the basic compartments of loading – 2 * 2000 kg
Pendant tanks under a wing 2 * 2000 kgRange of flight:
Normal – 1700 km
Without pendant tanks – 3000 km
1 tank – 3700 km
2 tanks – 4300 km
3 tanks – 4800 km
4 tanks – 5200 kmparalay su-27 has range exeded 3000 km,and since t-50 carries more fuel than su-27.how can t-50 hace less range than su-27?
Mikoyan@
You got it wrong.The extra 1 tank, is infact the extra internal fueltank that both Flankers and T-50 rarly use,, remember the normal takeoff fuel volume!
About 5700kg..But i think the T-50 will only be plummed for two DT not four!
so paralay was refering for 1 tank INTERNALLY.ok now i got it.great range anyway…:D
There are many paradox here:diablo:
Please notice that F-105 with centrelined weapon bay also be capable of centrelined external dropable tank, why doesn’t PAKFA?
My question actually is
Why this curved lip was abandoned?
And the first question remained